[Free Vulcan]

You have been proven wrong so many times you aren't even worth the trouble. Bottom line is, Bill Clinton, rather than going after terrorists like he should have been, focused on his political enemies, or in many cases the political enemies of his cocaine laden paranoid mind. As far as I am concerned he compromised national security with his deliberate negligence, aiding and abetting terrorism in the process. Anyone who supports all these bogus versions of events does the same.

[duk]

If you think that was bad, wait untill the full force of the Patriot/Homeland laws are wielded against other local terrorists. The Patriot Act II will gurantee Government success.

[_Jim]

You have been proven wrong so many times you aren't even worth the trouble.

The trouble is - the so-called science your guys practice isn't science; it's put out by hucksters intent *only* on espousing their limited, pre-conceived point of view to a crowd that is very naive in matters technical.

You'll *also* notice I rarely, if ever, get 'called' on any technical point.

Can't really say that about anybody else - now can you?

The points contained in the *full* report Sen. Dansforth issued have yet to be refuted technically. Sure, a few 'stabs' have been taken - usually by isolated individuals *outside* their specialty BUT they have failed to address the bulk of the OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE supporting a Davidian source for the fire or anything else.

You may attempt to keep this 'conspriacy' alive - but you're failing on the technological front to refute the *real* science that was put into verifying the FBI's statements and their account of what happened.

The evidence has NEVER been on your 'side'.