Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, liberals fear broader anti-terror powers - sides unite to protest Justice's push
The Dallas Morning News ^ | April 13, 2003 | By MICHELLE MITTELSTADT / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 04/13/2003 6:32:28 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

Conservatives, liberals fear broader anti-terror powers

Sides unite to protest Justice's push to widen Patriot Act's reach

04/13/2003

By MICHELLE MITTELSTADT / The Dallas Morning News

WASHINGTON – Fearful that the Bush administration is poised to ask Congress for greater anti-terrorism powers, including the right to strip Americans of their citizenship, liberals and conservatives are joining forces to block what they view as dangerous encroachments on civil liberties.

The loose-knit coalition was on display last week when conservative activists who otherwise are close administration allies joined the American Civil Liberties Union to decry the Justice Department's impending push for powers that could reach well beyond the USA Patriot Act that Congress raced to adopt in the dark, chaotic weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The possible outlines of what the Justice Department is seeking in a bill dubbed "Son of Patriot" or "Patriot 2" has had privacy and civil libertarian groups across the political spectrum in an uproar since a draft was leaked in February.

Although Justice Department officials insist the 86-page bill is a preliminary draft that bears little resemblance to what ultimately will be requested, some fear it's a clear sign of things to come.

"Based on past history of various administrations, when draft legislation such as the 'Son of Patriot' that we've been now seeing are first denied and then they surface, where there's smoke there's fire," said former Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia, a conservative Republican who is now an ACLU consultant. "We are very worried that it will surface in some way relatively quickly."

Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats have argued that the Justice Department should work with Congress to draft new anti-terrorism legislation rather than write it in secret.

The leaked draft, stamped "Confidential – Not for Distribution," would grant federal law enforcement sweeping new power to wiretap, detain and punish suspected terrorists while limiting court review and cloaking certain information from the public. Among the most criticized proposals: the right to strip the citizenship of Americans who provide "material" support to organizations designated terrorist groups.

"Everyone is concerned with protecting our people and our society and our homeland," said American Conservative Union Chairman David Keene. "But everyone should be equally concerned at the potential costs to our society and its very nature if we adopt measures that in retrospect would be viewed as unwise."

Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to discuss which parts of the leaked draft have been discarded and which remain viable.

"We're not going to discuss things that are being deliberated right now," he said. He dismissed criticism that lawmakers are being cut out of the loop, saying Congress ultimately will decide whether to accept, reject or amend the package that will be sent to Capitol Hill later this year.

The Patriot Act has been "an invaluable tool" for terrorism prevention, Mr. Corallo said, adding that he thinks critics have misunderstood the law, which expanded wiretapping and spying authority; lowered prohibitions on the sharing of intelligence with criminal investigators; and imposed restraints on the public release of information.

"The Patriot Act actually strengthened constitutional protections," he said.

That view is far from universally shared.

Librarians in some cities are hastening their routine shredding of patrons' records because of Patriot Act provisions that allow the FBI to review records at libraries, bookstores and other businesses. A California dive shop owner objected when the FBI sought lists of clients at his and other dive shops around the country, citing the possibility that a terrorist diver could launch an attack by slipping unseen into a U.S. port.

And now, groups such as the Eagle Forum and American Conservative Union are setting aside historic policy differences with liberal-leaning organizations such as the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation to tackle a range of post-Sept. 11 actions they view as threats to freedoms.

"We've given up some civil liberties since 9-11, there is no doubt about it," said Lori Waters, the Eagle Forum's executive director.

Conservative groups historically have left the defense of civil liberties to the ACLU, conservative activist Grover Norquist said. But, he added, "I'm not sure given the Republican control of the House and the Senate and the government that we can count on our left-of-center friends to look out for some of these issues."

The Patriot Act and its possible successor aren't the liberal and conservative groups' only concerns. They fret about a data-mining program known as Total Information Awareness being developed within the Pentagon; an airline passenger profiling system that could roll out later this year; and other proposals.

Ms. Waters and others are voicing particular dismay at reports that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, with administration backing, wants to make permanent Patriot Act provisions that expire in 2005.

"I am very concerned at the idea of getting rid of the sunsets," Mr. Norquist said.

Mr. Barr, the former congressman, said he viewed the Hatch bid, which apparently has been shelved for now, as an "end-run."

"This is particularly troubling because we have not yet had nearly the full opportunity that we ought to have to see how the Patriot Act is working," Mr. Barr said. "This is a very, very complex piece of legislation."

E-mail mmittelstadt@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/latestnews/stories/041303dnnatpatriot.41aa0.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: billofrights; patriotact; rights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 last
To: LibertarianInExile
"or public danger" ........
141 posted on 04/13/2003 9:55:33 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Here's a question; what would you be saying right now if Hillary or Al Gor were the ones signing this thing into law? I got $20 that says you would be one of those "Chicken Littles".
142 posted on 04/13/2003 9:57:47 PM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Tell you what; I'll "wake you up" when you finally answer the question of who you are and who knows you personally here on FR. It's the same deal with you and Roscoe and that whole American hating disruptive cabal that runs drooling into these threads.

I find it highly unusual that you've been here as long as you have and nobody knows you. No activism, no fellowship, no pic ...nothing but an oddball aganda on an internet forum. Wake me up when you do something besides just giving everyone your stupid opinions on everything.

Every time I confront you on this you run to the mods and have my post pulled. I don't trust oddball strangers so everything you say is irrelavent.... to me anyway.

It's not just you.

143 posted on 04/13/2003 10:12:18 PM PDT by thepitts ("A libertarian is a republican who smokes pot.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #144 Removed by Moderator

To: cinFLA
I have a hard time coming to rational discourse with those that want to have heroin, crack, ectasy sold at the corner grocery store. A few, including the Libertarian party, even want the drugs to be available to minors.

You confuse ending ineffective enforcement with "availability." All of those drugs are already available to their target markets. Ecstacy, for example, is a popular club drug because it is easier to get, and conceal the use of, than alcohol. Better to lower the drinking age.

You also make the mistake of thinking that legalizing drugs would lead to an expansion of the market for hard drugs. Heroin and other more dangerous drugs have a self-limiting market. Heroin was not widely used before the Drug War, and it has not become less widely used. Similarly LSD is easy to make, easy to hide, almost impossible to interdict, and yet, ourside of the Phish tour, not widely used. Crank is a biker/redneck drug, impossible to stop, but it doesn't find much use outside that culture.

In general, you are confusing stated intentions with actual effects. Tell me which government program actually does what it says:

EPA?

The Civil Rights Commission?

OSHA?

Dept. of Ed.?

Etc. About the only competent function of the FedGov is the military, and even there you would have to make an exception for domestic projects of the Corps of Engineers, which is one of the biggest blobs of pork fat in the budget.

So when I say end the EPA, I don't mean pollute everything. Who would even accuse me of being anti-education for wanting to end the Dept. of Ed.? However, you find it very easy to call me "pro drug" when I want to get rid of $70B in spending that doesn't do what it says it should do.

The Drug War is just like every other failed government program. And Patriot II will become a dangerous tool in the hands of a less good man than Dubya.

145 posted on 04/14/2003 4:42:23 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
a Justice Department proposal that would permit state and local law enforcement agencies to track down illegal immigrants as a way to fight terrorism.

It SOUNDS good, but look under the covers. If a local cop arrested someone for any other federal violation, the feds would be there in minutes. Except for immigration.

The problem is not local enforcement, it is that INS blows off local enforcement that has illegals in custody.

I am all for stronger border security. If we had good border security we would have much less reason for the governent to ask for generalized warrant-free domestic surveillance.

146 posted on 04/14/2003 4:46:39 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile; cinFLA
So let me ask you again: what exactly would be going too far for you, in terms of the 1st, 2nd, and 5th amendments to the U.S. Constitution?

So let me ask you again.

Forget cinFLA---he doesn't have the backbone to answer a straightforward question.

147 posted on 04/14/2003 6:19:06 AM PDT by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
Here's a question; what would you be saying right now if Hillary or Al Gor were the ones signing this thing into law? I got $20 that says you would be one of those "Chicken Littles".

I don't know. Of course, anything coming from either of those 2 should be held suspect (guilty until proven innocent! lol!)

I think my most honest reply would be to repost my #24 from this thread.

To: AAABEST

That MeeknMing must be a terrorist, huh? He should be scared ! . . .Just kidding.

Hey, I'm not an expert on all this stuff, seriously. And I'm not as guarded as I probably should be on stuff I post on the Internet, either. I mean, I post my name sometimes and folks are SHOCKED that I would do that. Anyway . . .

24 posted on 04/13/2003 11:34 AM CDT by MeeknMing (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)


148 posted on 04/14/2003 6:22:45 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I see that the "mystery meat" tag team

It seems that one of them stumbles on a thread of serious political discussion and then lights up the Bat-Signal to bring in the rest of the gang.

149 posted on 04/14/2003 6:40:56 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
I know, I thought I'd give it one last shot before I started resorting to abuse button tactics. I'm sick of seeing people come on here and completely attack, without even discussion about where it is they disagree and why. One of the things I do for a living is show people how to pick out points of contention between debaters. Here, there isn't even that opportunity. It's completely debased into immediate non sequitur.

Witness: YOU people think. From a post that asks a QUESTION. How the HELL do you know what I think if you haven't even read a post on the subject from me--just a question? I don't ascribe personal points of view the way I used to on here, because after experience with this crowd, I can't say that labels are precise enough here in this specific place on the web. There are so many unique conservative views here to classify these folks as one crowd is to completely ignore some major differences. I might disagree but I'd like to know where, exactly, and most important, WHY?

I am so disappointed in today's political culture. There is no logic, there is no debate, it's 100% Carville-ized, even the right now. And once logic is gone, once it's 100% grade-A emotion in politics, it's the end of any possibility of a government of laws, since mob rule is all about who shouts loudest, longest.

The worst part about the whole thing, the thing I most hate, is that I rarely see a rational discussion on this CONSERVATIVE forum of any sort regarding any constitutional issues--it's 'Jackbooted Nazi Statist!' vs. 'Commie Liberal Anarchist!' from the getgo, if it's THAT nice. And I will certainly confess that I've been part of those arguments, to my shame.

I have held opinions from Republican party line to libertarian because I have an open mind, and I'm willing to listen and discuss. If you call me a baby killer or tell me I'm an ally of George Soros or some other lame attack, I'll never come around to your opinion. If you have a different opinion and tell me why, maybe I'll come around to agree with you. At the least I might consider your viewpoint well reasoned, even if I disagree with it.

I don't want to turn us all into Rodney Kings--we don't need to all get along--then we might as well be playing on DU. But to just see attack after attack is so tiresome and unproductive.
150 posted on 04/14/2003 7:17:42 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (Didn't FDR start the NRA? http://www.ggriffith.com/nra.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Anyone feeling safer?

From CNET News.com, 3/31/2003:

A U.S. Attorney's office has alleged that PayPal violated laws regarding the processing of online gambling payments, and is asking parent company eBay to hand over nine months of PayPal earnings in settlement.

The U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri told eBay that its online payment service violated provisions in the USA Patriot Act between October 2001 and July 2002, according to eBay's annual report, filed Monday with securities regulators. Under the act, it is prohibited to transmit funds known to have come from a criminal offense, or that are intended to promote or support unlawful activities.

The agency is seeking to collect any earnings that PayPal received from online gambling merchants during the nine-month period, as well as interest. Last year, PayPal received 6 percent of its revenue from online gambling, according to its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
eBay, however, takes issue with the U.S. Attorney's allegations.
151 posted on 04/14/2003 7:40:10 AM PDT by JohnGalt (Class of '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

Comment #152 Removed by Moderator

To: Cultural Jihad
traffic tickets equate to a 'constitutional crisis.'

LOL!

153 posted on 04/18/2003 10:59:23 AM PDT by gonewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gonewt
It does seem ludicrous, but there are a few nuts around who try to advocate that very idea.
154 posted on 04/18/2003 11:35:41 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson