Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executions threaten moderate exile viewpoints
The Miami Herald ^ | Sat, Apr. 12, 2003 | OSCAR CORRAL AND ELAINE DE VALLE

Posted on 04/12/2003 7:09:42 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez

The summary trials and executions of three accused Cuban hijackers Friday by the Cuban government were predictably condemned across the board by Miami's Cuban exile community.

But there may be a local casualty that's less obvious: moderate viewpoints among many exiles, who until Friday had been leaning closer to dialogue with Cuba.

''We didn't shut the door, Castro did,'' said Carlos Saladrigas, chairman of the Cuba Study Group, a moderate exile group that encourages increased communication between Cubans on the island and in Miami.

``All I'm saying is that we are not going to shut the door. Let the Cuban government shut the door. And they have.''

The executed men were arrested last week aboard a ferry that they tried to hijack in Havana and sail to Florida.

SWIFT TRIALS

In swift trials that took place behind closed doors, three of the eight hijackers were convicted of terrorist acts and were killed Friday morning by a firing squad.

Another four hijackers received life sentences and a fifth was sentenced to 30 years in prison.

Many exiles believe the hijackers were simply seeking freedom.

''It is a total violation of international law and one that should not go unpunished,'' said Andy Gomez, senior fellow at the Institute of Cuban and Cuban American Studies at the University of Miami.

``With an issue like this, I think the Cuban community will unify, whether they have become more tolerant, whether their positions have changed politically.''

Miami Commissioner Tomás Regalado, an anti-Castro hard-liner, said the Cuban government has sent out a clear message that there is nothing to talk about.

''Any form of dialogue with the Cuban government is dead because the Cuban government killed it,'' Regalado said. ``It's going to recharge the Cuban exiles. Those who were indifferent are going to be incensed, and the passion is going to come back.''

STANCE NOT CHANGED

But not everyone was ready to dismiss the concept of dialogue. Silvia Wilhelm, founder of Puentes Cubanos (Cuban Bridges), an anti-embargo group that works to form people-to-people contacts on the island, said she condemns the executions, but they do not affect her stance that economic sanctions against the island must end and travel restrictions must be lifted.

''Absolutely, there has to be an opening,'' she said. ``This policy of isolating Cuba has not helped in 43 years.''

Miami Mayor Manny Diaz said he wants to focus on raising awareness of Cuba's human rights abuses around the country and internationally. He said many people outside Miami have forgotten how brutal the Cuban government is.

''People need to open their eyes to the kind of system in Cuba,'' Diaz said. ``Right now, we're thousands of miles away toppling a dictator, but yet there is a dictator 90 miles away who has done the same things.''

The Cuban American National Foundation (CANF) called a press conference to get the word out. CANF Chairman Jorge Mas Santos said Castro government officials have made it clear that they are not interested in any kind of change.

''He has done this at a time when world attention is on Iraq,'' Mas Santos said. ``He did this as a way to literally get away with murder. . . . We call on the world to condemn and criminalize them and hold them responsible for what happens on the island.''

Cuban radio stations were abuzz with news of the executions, with listeners calling in to blast the Cuban government. Some callers were furious, others nearly in tears. They called the executions inhumane, uncivilized and a travesty of justice.

''I would expect these people to be punished or to be jailed, but to kill them without any kind of justice?'' asked Rick Sanchez, a national television anchor who hosts a daily show on the Spanish-language station WQBA-AM (1140). ``That's not something you do in a civilized country.''

CONDEMNATION

U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Miami, also condemned the executions, saying while she does not condone hijacking as a method of fleeing Cuba, the country should not have retaliated so harshly.

''These people were killed simply because they were trying to leave the country,'' she said. ``That's an injustice.''


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: castro; cuba; execution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
"...with Liberty, and Justice for all."
1 posted on 04/12/2003 7:09:43 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: William Wallace; Prodigal Daughter; afraidfortherepublic; JohnHuang2; Budge; A Citizen Reporter; ...
"These people were killed simply because they were trying to leave the country," she said. "That's an injustice."
2 posted on 04/12/2003 7:10:59 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

Thanks Registered

3 posted on 04/12/2003 7:11:02 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Castro came into power as a murderer.
Castro has stayed in power being a murderer.
The left's capacity for ideological self-deception is bottomless.
4 posted on 04/12/2003 7:13:55 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
I don't know what graphic you are using today, but it doesn't load and has been bogging down every thread I've seen it on this morning.

Regards
5 posted on 04/12/2003 7:18:10 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Regime Change BUMP!
6 posted on 04/12/2003 7:18:45 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Talk about an understatement! To be shot for trying to leave a country. Sickening.

Communists: "If I can't have them, nobody will!"

7 posted on 04/12/2003 7:26:43 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
This policy of isolating Cuba has not helped in 43 years.''

It's our fault

8 posted on 04/12/2003 7:36:04 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
So what is the Bush plan to liberate Cuba?
9 posted on 04/12/2003 7:37:07 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
No one could reason with dictators like Hitler or Stalin, and no one can do it with Fidel either.

You simply cannot talk with a dictator. Violence is the only language they understand. Moderation is not an option with thugs.
10 posted on 04/12/2003 8:25:40 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
In other words, they were executed for behaving in a perfectly rational manner.
11 posted on 04/12/2003 11:12:16 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell ( The roots of liberty are fertilized by the stinking rotting corpse of tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Yes, basically.
12 posted on 04/12/2003 11:36:08 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
President Bush yesterday responded to the overtures his predecessor Jimmy Carter made to Cuba last week by denouncing Fidel Castro as a tyrant, and making it clear that the American trade embargo would remain in place.

In a White House speech to mark the centenary of Cuba's independence,

the president announced some minor concessions, including the resumption of a direct postal service between the two countries.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/cuba/story/0,11983,719247,00.html

But he said normal relations would be impossible until Havana introduced proper democratic reforms.
13 posted on 04/12/2003 11:53:36 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW; Luis Gonzalez
THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release July 16, 1997

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT

Today I am notifying the Congress of my decision to suspend for 6 more months the right of U.S. citizens to file suit against foreign firms trafficking in confiscated properties in Cuba. This decision is consistent with my strong commitment to implement the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act (LIBERTAD Act) in a way that best serves our national interest and hastens a peaceful transition to democracy in Cuba.

I have invoked this waiver for the past year in order to continue strengthening cooperation with our friends and allies toward our shared goal of ending Cuba's 38 years of oppression. Thanks to the efforts of Stuart Eizenstat -- my Special Representative for the Promotion of Democracy in Cuba and now Under Secretary of State -- we have made significant progress. We are forging an international consensus on concrete steps to clear the way for a new era of democracy and prosperity for the people of Cuba(Clinton admin lies, how we don't miss them).

The bill is an Act of Congress introduced by Sen. Jesse Helms (R, NC) and Rep. Dan Burton (D, IN) that formalizes US sanctions against Cuba.

A provision of the act that would allow American companies and individuals to sue in US courts foreign companies benefiting from confiscated American property in Cuba has been prevented from being implemented since the acts adoption into law in 1996.

Six month "exemptions" of the above provison have been allowed by Presidential order all through the Klintoon administration and unfortunately up until now, the Bush administration.

In light of recent events, it is clear that the upcoming deadline in July for implementation of the law of the land be allowed to proceed unhindered.

Castro wants to piss on the USA and freedom, and if W grants another exemption, Castro will be literally getting away with murder once again.

This must not stand.

The exemption expires in July.

This needs publicity.

14 posted on 04/12/2003 8:26:20 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000; Luis Gonzalez
if W

grants another exemption,

Castro will be literally getting away with murder
once again.

This must not stand.

The exemption expires in July.

This needs publicity.

BUMP

and I know of a radio host and writer that could help get this out...

15 posted on 04/12/2003 8:32:36 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
No way this is geting swept under the rug this time around.
16 posted on 04/12/2003 8:44:13 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Thanks for the heads up!
17 posted on 04/12/2003 10:46:31 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000; TLBSHOW
Todd, I will answer this question, because it is a legitimate one.

I have been basically against this provision on Helms-Burton since the inception of the Bill, which is why I haven't spoken out against it in the past.

And my doubts on this provision remain.

Who, outside of trial lawyers, would it benefit?

The properties in question were confiscated by the Castro regime, who in turn, and acting as the recognized government of Cuba, entered into agreements with these foreign firms.

The firms in question will argue that they have a legitimate business arrangement with the government of Cuba, leaving only one entity to bring suit against...Fidel and the government of Cuba.

Even if someone wins the lawsuit...Fidel will not pay.

Then, once Fidel falls, these people who won the suits will try to recoup money and properties from whatever government follows him that recognizes the validity of the award.

At that point, the situation changes, and exiles will be fighting newly-freed Cubans for what little resources the Island has.

It will foster much resentment between exiles and natives.
18 posted on 04/13/2003 7:47:27 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
thanks Luis
19 posted on 04/13/2003 8:28:53 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000; TLBSHOW
"...which is why I haven't spoken out against it in the past."

That of course should have read "which is why I haven't spoken out against the extension in the past."

20 posted on 04/13/2003 9:08:24 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson