Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Water Demands Draining U.S. Rivers: Many Rivers Suffering from Severe Water Shortages
Environmental News Service ^ | 04/10/2003 | J.R. Pegg

Posted on 04/11/2003 10:15:15 AM PDT by cogitator

Water Demands Draining U.S. Rivers

WASHINGTON, DC, April 10, 2003 (ENS) - Many of America's rivers are suffering from severe water shortages, with drought and human water consumption placing some of these waterways in acute peril, warns a new report released today by American Rivers.

The conservation organization's report, "America's Most Endangered Rivers of 2003," details 10 rivers that face immediate and severe danger, but paints a larger picture of a nation tumbling towards a possible water crisis.

"America's seemingly insatiable demand for fresh water is nearing nature's limits," American Rivers President Rebecca Wodder told reporters at today's press conference. "And we have designed much of the human landscape to make the problem worse, not better."

At the center of the concern is a simple fact - the United States uses more water per person than any other country with little regard for waste or cost. The U.S. average of 1,300 gallons per day is some 60 times the average for many developing countries, according to the World Water Council, with some 85 percent used to for irrigation.

CAPTION The Ipswich River is being starved of water by excessive groundwater pumping and human consumption. (Photo courtesy American Rivers) You gotta see this picture!

U.S. irrigation habits, urban sprawl, increased groundwater pumping and loss of wetlands are endangering the nation's rivers and draining its fresh water supply, Wodder explained, and more often than not government policies are making things worse.

Two federal government projects, one to drain 300 square miles of wetlands and another to scour more than 100 miles of river bottom, put Mississippi's Big Sunflower River at the top of this year's list. These U.S. Army Corps of Engineer flood control projects are poised to go forward this year, unless reviews by state officials or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) judge otherwise.

"Unless the EPA stands up to political armtwisting," Wodder said, "the Corps of Engineers will drain and scrape the life out of the Big Sunflower River to help a small number of farms collect bigger subsidy checks from American taxpayers."

CAPTION Americans love pristine rivers for relaxation and recreation, but the nation's water use choices are putting many rivers in danger. (Photo by Mark Lance courtesy American Rivers)

The effects of federal agricultural policy and subsidies have had a severe impact on the Klamath River, which is the second cited by American Rivers.

The Bush administration's decision to increase irrigation flows to farmers in the upper region of the river contributed to the deaths of some 33,000 salmon last September. This was the worst recorded fish kill in U.S. history.

Balancing the water needs of competing interests in the Klamath River Basin is not easy, said Representative Mike Thompson, a California Democrat. But the Bush administration's policy, by pitting upstream farmers against conservationists and fishers, is an attempt "to shoehorn a political solution to a scientific problem," Thompson said at today's press conference.

"The problem with the Klamath River is a uniquely local problem that is unfortunately exacerbated by this administration's policies," he said.

CAPTION Low water levels contributed to a massive fish kill in the Klamath River last September. (Photo by Northcoast Environmental Center courtesy American Rivers)

Thompson introduced legislation in the House today that would allocate $200 million to landowners and tribes throughout the Klamath Basin who participate in water conservation projects. It is designed to bring together stakeholders from the upper and lower basin, Thompson explained, to "eliminate competing interests and find feasible solutions."

"The communities within the Klamath Basin cannot afford to wait any longer," he said.

Severe water shortages earned the Ipswich River the number three slot on the list, but it is not agricultural policy that is causing the crisis in the Massachusetts river. It is excessive groundwater pumping and municipal water consumption that leave portions of the river dry each summer.

The river often looks more like a dirt road, said Kerry Mackin, executive director of the Ipswich River Watershed Association.

"We count more dead fish than living fish," Mackin said.

The combination of excessive municipal water consumption and groundwater pumping are directly related and threaten water supplies across the nation, warned Robert Glennon, a law professor at the University of Arizona and author of the book "Water Follies: Groundwater Pumping and the Fate of America's Fresh Waters."

CAPTION Low water levels at the Platte River could have a negative impact on migrating waterfowl, including the sandhill crane. (Photo courtesy U.S. National Park Service)

The United States now pumps some 28 trillion gallons of groundwater every year, Glennon explained, with little regard for how this affects the hydrological cycle.

"We are allowing limitless access to a finite resource," he said. "There is a disconnect between the law and science."

Pumping groundwater, Glennon explained, reduces the natural flow of water into the nation's rivers and depletes a resource that took thousands of years to accumulate. But as demand for water increases, local and state entities are increasingly looking below ground for additional supply.

This has created a direct threat to the Platte River, which is on the endangered list, and threatens to undermine an agreement to secure adequate flows in the Platte River and to protect its adjacent wetlands.

The Platte River, which runs through Wyoming, Colorado and Nebraska, is considered by conservationists to be the most important stopover for migratory birds in the nation's heartland.

Excessive diversion and consumption are also responsible for putting the Rio Grande on this year's list, Wodder explained, and water flow issues also led the organization to put Colorado's Gunnison River on its list.

In part because of population growth, the nation's municipal water consumption is the fastest growing sector of U.S. water use, in particular from low density sprawl development.

This is a serious concern for the Mattaponi River, which makes the endangered list because it is threatened by a planned reservoir that would provide water for the sprawling cities of Virginia's Tidewater region.

CAPTION Virginia's Mattaponi River is considered one of the most pristine coastal river systems on the eastern seaboard. (Photo by G. Warren Mountacastle, Jr. courtesy American Rivers)

"Healthy watersheds capture and store water for human and natural needs, but sprawl development creates landscapes that shed water like a raincoat," Wodder said. "Water rushing down storm drains when it rains is water that will not come up from your well when it is sunny."

Wodder also warned that the Bush administration's decision to revise the scope of the Clean Water Act's protection for wetlands could add to the long list of threats to the nation's rivers. Conservationists believe the reinterpretation of the law by the administration effectively removed protection for as much as 20 percent of the wetlands in the lower 48 states.

"Draining, filling or paving over wetlands and small streams sets off a chain reaction that eventually reduces the water available in river for people and wildlife," Wodder explained. "As wetlands are lost, flash floods increase but less rainfall soaks into the ground. As groundwater levels fall, springs dry up and stream flows drop."

U.S. Representative James Oberstar, a Minnesota Democrat, told reporters at the press conference that he supports a legislative effort to reverse the Supreme Court decision that the Bush administration has used to justify its narrow reinterpretation of what constitutes a protected wetland under the Clean Water Act.

"The Supreme Court decision is undermining a 30 year effort to improve America's waterways," Oberstar said. "We have to get back on track to what the Clean Water Act intended."

The other rivers on the list are Colorado's Gunnison River, which is burdened by unnatural water flows, along with the Snake River and Georgia's Tallapoosa River, which are both threatened by impacts from dams, and the Trinity River in Texas, which could be severely affected by planned flood control and floodplain projects.

The water issues that are affecting America's rivers will only get more serious, said Glennon, and will require strong leadership at the local, state and federal levels of government.

"This is a tragedy of the commons," he said. "We need to start to recognize the economic value of water."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conservation; enviralists; resources; rivers; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: Alberta's Child
There are rivers east of the Appalachian Mountains any one of which could probably satusfy the entire nation's demand. But many of them are too polluted for human consumptions

Only a risk-taker would drink directly from a river -- strain, boil and filter it first and it's pure again.

61 posted on 04/11/2003 12:10:08 PM PDT by Old Professer (Every generation's war is a revelation to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
CAPTION The Ipswich River is being starved of water by excessive groundwater pumping and human consumption. (Photo courtesy American Rivers) You gotta see this picture!

The people in this region must have incredibly large bladders!

62 posted on 04/11/2003 12:20:10 PM PDT by meyer (how do I turn this thing off?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
The Ipswich "River" is at best a creek less than twenty miles from the ocean and New England has been in a 4/5 year drought that just might have been broken by this winter's snow pack.

Give me a ping in August and we'll see how the Ipswich is doing.

While water shortages may be a local issue, I seem to remember from my high school freshman science course (45 years is a long time ago) that there is no less or more water than there has ever been, that the form it's in may change (liquid, solid, etc.), and the place it's in may change, but it's all still here.

I think this is alarmism in the Malthusian tradition.

63 posted on 04/11/2003 12:25:14 PM PDT by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
The usualy environmental sky-is-falling nonsense, in other words.

That is the problem - the BS and lies that the environazis have been using to further the cause has destroyed their own credibility. Now, even if they told the truth (and there's no evidence that this article is the truth), people will doubt them. The left has probably done more to harm the environment than they have to help it simply due to their lies and their use of the environment as a tool to expand socialism.

64 posted on 04/11/2003 12:28:22 PM PDT by meyer (how do I turn this thing off?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
No, eventually it is going to rain! News Break, we are getting the biggest rain storms we have had in 3 years!
65 posted on 04/11/2003 12:31:36 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Maybe that's what that "Big Dig" is in Massachusettes they've been working on for so long?
66 posted on 04/11/2003 12:56:19 PM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
west of colorado state,most states have water problems,including california,and is going to get worse with the drought.

Drought does occur in the West, and we are just finishing a warming solar cycle, (cooler years are coming). But the ultimate way to handle water shortages is to let the market price determine the allocation. The west has many agriculture users paying a lower price for water than residents. Until this changes, they have no reason to use more efficient irragation. And, if the price goes up enough, we will develop desalinization and more north to south transfer. solve it with capitalism, and leave the environmentalists out of it. (Oh, and I realize this means we will pay more for our veggies too.)

67 posted on 04/11/2003 12:56:54 PM PDT by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: shotgun
Honey, I know all about Klamath Falls! I wrote Byrd at the time he was head of the Appropriations and told him he had better send the $20 million.....and he did, but not just cause I said what I said, .......

This whole artilce is ambiguous! You can't have your cake and eat it too.....which, I might say you are not trying too, nor farmfriend, but a Delphi technique!

Create a problem to get a fix....a fix of copasetic(sp) folks! Just say NO! Don't fall for this! Tell them to get the hell off our your land, out of your county and out of your state!













68 posted on 04/11/2003 1:03:21 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
I love that comedy bit by Stephen Wright where he puts a humidifier and a dehumidifier in the middle of the room and lets them fight it out.

Only todays screwed up world would be so bold as to imply that people and golf courses can live in suburban lawn covered housing tracts in areas of the world with no water supply.

What's next? A solar shortage in the northern latitudes creating cold temperatures? Oh the inhumanity!

If an Aboriginal Bushman knows that you must live within those circumstances nature has handed you, how smart can we be to build towns in places like Las Vegas?

69 posted on 04/11/2003 1:05:51 PM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
it is easy to distribute it unwisely.

Yeah like saving it for sucker fish, instead of farmers.

Like flushing salmon down to the ocean , using so much water that you kill all of the native fish spilling all the water, and all of the fish over the dam. That flush of water killed much of the salmon.Leaving the lake so low that a major part of a counties economy is hurt.

By the way, the last 2,or3 years we have had record amounts of Salmon, and Steelhead, and we still have the dams.

So much for their propaganda, and junk science.
70 posted on 04/11/2003 1:12:59 PM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
I agree with using free market forces to distribute water, but only if tax dollars are left out of the equation. We've got about 100 "endangered fish" out here on the lower Gunnison that are worth about 100 million a piece- that's the amount of tax payers money that's been spent on lawsuits against every other river user to ensure a perfect (end of ice age) habitat for them. I don't mind competing for my irrigation water on the open market, but no one can compete against the unlimited amount of money these environmentalists seem to have. Their policies have caused a lot of depopulation out here, and I fear that they won't stop until they've cleared out all the people.
71 posted on 04/11/2003 1:13:12 PM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
LOL!

Maybe it's been pulling water out of the Ipswich River.

72 posted on 04/11/2003 1:16:40 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Red Boots
Their policies have caused a lot of depopulation out here, and I fear that they won't stop until they've cleared out all the people.

Same here I believe that is the goal, and I fear because so many of the rest of the people, so-called conservatives included don't get it.
73 posted on 04/11/2003 1:19:51 PM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Why doesn't the U.S. have some of our water from up here in Canada? Why could just share our's with you, problem solved.
74 posted on 04/11/2003 1:22:43 PM PDT by IvanT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
I drain my grey water into my yard garden. That's illegal, but my tomatoes are criminally tasty. I've never once had to water my garden. I have an outhouse which I use from March thru November when I'm outside doing chores.

If you want to hear something funny, read this. Our county has a law that makes you pump out your septic tank sludge every two years. The driver then drives out onto a farmers field and pays him to spread the sludge. Now can you explain to me why my county made me rip up a perfectly fine system which did not need to be pumped out ever, and make me spend $20,000 for a new "system" which gets spread on the fields across the street not more than 50 yards from my drain field mound?

My outhouse is technically illegal. It wastes no water and without a mirror and lights, I have become much more handsome.

When I'm in need of a good shower in the summer time, I use the livestock shower in the barn because it sprays water like it means business and it drains into our pasture where the grass grows best.

Claiming that we are technically advanced and civilized is quite a stretch IMHO. Every technical leap forward seems to be counterbalanced by real idiocy.

Think about it. We have posters here terrified over river and groundwater levels because they have paved over most the urban free space which replentishes the aquifers. They are terrified that three years from now they might not have a green golf course or will be told they have to use plastic utensils at Shoney's.

75 posted on 04/11/2003 1:23:40 PM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Additionally, I would be more terrified about eating at Shoney's.
76 posted on 04/11/2003 1:27:52 PM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
You ought to see the lawn irrigation out here on the front range of Colorado. These guys grow Kentucky Bluegrass on their lawns and water the crap out of it. If you don't keep your lawn up the Neighborhood Association will sue you or the city will fine you. I moved here from Tennessee where I wished my lawn would STOP growing.
77 posted on 04/11/2003 1:36:05 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Is that near the Joyce Kilmer wilderness Area?
78 posted on 04/11/2003 1:36:49 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
I grow bluegrass on my runway. If I cut it @4 inches, I've never needed to water it. It makes takeoffs a hundred feet longer but sure makes the landings soft. Nice on the bare toes too!
79 posted on 04/11/2003 1:40:33 PM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
the dead fish are likely the result of oxygen depletion fro a dry spell and reduced water flow.

No, it was from meth lab waste being dumped into the stream.

80 posted on 04/11/2003 1:42:18 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson