Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada would not hand Iraqi leader to U.S. Orders from Ottawa in case of capture
nationalpost ^ | Robert Fife, Ottawa Bureau Chief

Posted on 04/10/2003 10:32:42 AM PDT by Noddegamra

Canada would not hand Iraqi leader to U.S. Orders from Ottawa in case of capture

Robert Fife, Ottawa Bureau Chief National Post

Wednesday, April 09, 2003

OTTAWA - The Canadian in command of a multinational naval task force in the Persian Gulf said yesterday that the federal government has ordered him not to hand over any Iraqis he captures to the United States, including even Saddam Hussein and his two sons.

Commodore Roger Girouard, the head of the nine-nation Task Force 151, said Ottawa has said he is allowed to turn over any al-Qaeda and Taliban terrorists to U.S. forces.

His task force's mission is to hunt al-Qaeda terrorists and escort U.S. supply ships en route to the war in Iraq.

But the Liberal government has expressly forbidden him to hand over suspected Iraqi terrorists, war criminals or members of Saddam's inner circle.

"There's no mandate at all and, in fact, I am told specifically not to turn Iraqi sailors or citizens back to the U.S. forces at this point in time," he told reporters during a conference call from aboard HMCS Iroquois, his flagship.

"If I knew I had a known member of the regime, I wouldn't knowingly let them go, I would ask for government guidance on that particular one. The key to me right now, I would also not automatically turn them over to the United States or any other country for that matter."

Commodore Girouard said the orders mean that if Saddam or his sons were found to be aboard a ship, he could not hand them over to the Americans unless Ottawa approved.

He said he believes the policy would allow him to arrest Saddam or members of the regime.

"There is no doubt in my mind that if Saddam Hussein himself or one of his doubles were found in a vessel that we stumbled upon for some reason, we would not knowingly let a member at that level go," he said.

"But what we have been told if there are risks associated with a vessel or risks associated with an individual that we would relate that back to National Defence headquarters for guidance and it would depend on the specifics on the situation."

John McCallum, the Defence Minister, later told reporters it may be a "moot point" since the Iraqi President may have been killed in an American bombing attack on Monday.

However, he said Canada will stick to its policy of not handing over Iraqi war criminals or members of Saddam's regime to U.S. forces until Ottawa makes a final determination.

"We have a policy that we turn over the al-Qaeda suspected terrorists but should it be a suspected member of the Iraq regime then they will contact us back here, but I think that the odds are extraordinarily low given where our ships are," he said.

John Reynolds, the Canadian Alliance House leader, said the Commodore's orders were an outrage, saying the Americans would board the Canadian ship and arrest Saddam if he was captured by the task force.

"It's just an absolute joke. Those are ships and our troops are there with our allies and I don't think there would be one Canadian who would accept the fact that if they happen to bump into Saddam Hussein that they shouldn't arrest him and turn him over to the Americans," he said.

"I'll tell you the Americans would get him off the boat if we didn't turn him over."

Although Task Force 151 reports to the U.S. Navy's 5th fleet at Central Command in Qatar -- coalition headquarters for the war in Iraq -- Commodore Girouard said his ships' role is to protect allied supply ships, search for fleeing al-Qaeda or Taliban fighters and enforce the UN embargo against Iraq.

"I have a very clear separation in terms of staying away from Iraqi flag vessels -- military vessels. There is also, of course, a certain concern about the issue of detainees so a vessel full of Iraqis needs to be considered in a very careful fashion," he said.

Commodore Girouard acknowledged that on at least one occasion he has refused a U.S. request for help that would have violated Canada's neutrality in the Iraqi conflict.

"On one occasion ... I was asked to do something and I discussed what the situation was and I told [the Americans] I could not do that; that I felt it fell in to Operation Iraqi Freedom," he said. "They agreed and, at that point, an American asset [ship] took on that particular job."

Some opposition critics have said Canada is participating in the war through the back door by escorting American and British ships into the region.

Fresh concerns surfaced last week when a U.S. military official said Canadian sailors are actively pursuing Iraqi military and government officials on behalf of American forces.

But Commodore Girouard disputed that, saying he is more interested in a suspect ship's history to determine if it has been implicated in previous smuggling operations.

The Canadian ships were deployed as part of Operation Enduring Freedom, the U.S.-led war on terrorism. Three Canadian frigates -- HMCS Iroquois, HMCS Regina and HMCS Fredericton -- are part of the 20-vessel task force.

The task force includes U.S., French, Italian, New Zealand, Dutch and Greek vessels. It has been sweeping across the Straits of Hormuz, the southern Persian Gulf and portions of the central Gulf.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; canada; decapitation; hmcsfredericton; hmcsiroquois; hmcsregina; oef; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2003 10:32:42 AM PDT by Noddegamra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
If we have to send troops into Canada to take Saddam, so be it.
2 posted on 04/10/2003 10:34:48 AM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
""I'll tell you the Americans would get him off the boat if we didn't turn him over."

D@mn straight we would - at gunpoint if necessary.
As our President put it: "If you're not with us, you're against us."
Or words to that effect.

3 posted on 04/10/2003 10:35:40 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
With friends like the Canadians, who needs the French?
4 posted on 04/10/2003 10:38:15 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
To Freep or not to Freep


Click The Logo to Donate
Click The Logo To Donate

5 posted on 04/10/2003 10:38:55 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
"Canada would not hand Iraqi leader to U.S. Orders from Ottawa in case of capture"

Okay... Canada!!! We can do this the easy way, or we can do this the REALLY Easy Way!!!

6 posted on 04/10/2003 10:39:17 AM PDT by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: per loin
I was thinking of something more along the line of a MOAB into parliament in Ottawa

< /disgust>

7 posted on 04/10/2003 10:39:22 AM PDT by CedarDave (Why is "Karbala Katie" so anti-American?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
Ya know, I'm not angry at the Canadian govt. because they've chosen not to join us -- but I'm bloody livid that they're bragging to the media about not helping us.
8 posted on 04/10/2003 10:41:07 AM PDT by ellery (GOD BLESS FREE IRAQ!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
In case you missed it last night:

NY ISLANDERS 3; OTTAWA SENATORS 0

9 posted on 04/10/2003 10:42:02 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
I hope the Commode man can tread water, because Canadians are insane if they think we would let Saddam and company make it to Kanucistan to ask for Asylum, which they would doubtless grant.

So9

10 posted on 04/10/2003 10:44:49 AM PDT by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
Can't have these people step foot on American soil and go through the justice system.

Our country needs to be spared the indignity of watching our American-hating Leftists protest that the Ba'ath Party should get a fair trial and not a military tribunal.

11 posted on 04/10/2003 10:46:04 AM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Yeah...all that I was asking for was an official endorsement without any material support whatsoever (though I silently would've expected some naval and special ops support so far as they are capable of providing it).

They have gone past the point of simply refusing such support and moved all the way to obstructionism. Canada needs to pay a price, or else the real Canadians need to make all the displaced Frenchmen who are ruining that country pay a price.

12 posted on 04/10/2003 10:46:33 AM PDT by American Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
What part of "harboring terrorists" does Cretin not understand?
13 posted on 04/10/2003 10:47:08 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Rumble Thee Forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
If they catch Iraqis -"at that point, an American asset [ship] will take on that particular job."

The End.
14 posted on 04/10/2003 10:47:58 AM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Liberate Iraq! Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
Just more proof that the current Canadian political leadership is so out of touch with reality. It's disgusting that such a story is even possible, but with the current leadership in "Au Canada", it's all in a day's work.
15 posted on 04/10/2003 10:50:00 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
The potential Canadian tourist trade from America just dropped some more...if our moronic neighbors to the north keep this up they may have to actually go out and build an army, navy and air force to protect themselves instead of relying on the USA while they live in socialism...
16 posted on 04/10/2003 10:52:54 AM PDT by kellynla ( "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div '69 & '70 An Hoa, Viet Nam Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noddegamra
Canada Iraqi leader
17 posted on 04/10/2003 10:54:10 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
Memo to Rummy:

Put Syria, Iran and N. Korea on the back-burner.

Draw up war plans for Canada.
18 posted on 04/10/2003 10:57:34 AM PDT by Noddegamra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: per loin
"If we have to send troops into Canada to take Saddam, so be it."

Absolutely. Time to close the border with Canada. They are no friend to us.

19 posted on 04/10/2003 10:58:23 AM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
"D@mn straight we would - at gunpoint if necessary. As our President put it: "If you're not with us, you're against us." Or words to that effect."

No question. And Canada is NOT with us. They have the gaul, cowardice and hubris of the French, though.

20 posted on 04/10/2003 11:01:08 AM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson