Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warring Tribes, Here and There [Rummy's failed war plan alert/Quagmire flashback]
New York Times ^ | April 2, 2003 | By MAUREEN DOWD

Posted on 04/09/2003 5:03:35 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

April 2, 2003

Warring Tribes, Here and There

By MAUREEN DOWD

WASHINGTON

The president and his war council did not expect so much heavy guerrilla resistance in Iraq. And they really did not expect so much heavy guerrilla resistance at home.

But you can't have transformation without provocation.

This was a war designed to change the nature of American foreign policy, military policy and even the national character — flushing out ambivalence and embracing absolutism.

As two members of the pre-emptive Bush doctrine's neo-con brain trust, Bill Kristol and Lawrence Kaplan, argued in a book-length call for battle, "The War Over Iraq": "Well, what is wrong with dominance, in the service of sound principles and high ideals?"

So it should not be a surprise that the troubled opening phase of the war has exacerbated territorial and ideological fissures in the administration and the Republican Party.

Democrats are muter than mute. But a dozen days of real war in the desert has turned the usually disciplined Bush crowd into a bunch of schismatics: there is internecine warfare between the "hold out a hand" Bush I team and the "back of the hand" Bush II team. There's a feud between Donald Rumsfeld and some of his generals and ex-generals, and animosity between the Pentagon — where Rummy, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Douglas Feith spin schemes for intimidating the world and remodeling the Middle East — and the State Department. Colin Powell and his deputies wince as old alliances shatter and the Arab world seethes, and mutter that there had to be a way to get rid of Saddam without making everyone on the planet despise America.

The Washington Post reported on Monday that moderate Republicans were trying to do an intervention with the president to show him that hawks were giving him "bum advice."

The article was clearly referring to the Bush I realpolitik crowd of James Baker, Brent Scowcroft, Lawrence Eagleburger and Mr. Powell and his acolytes at State. These pals of Poppy Bush are alarmed that the Hobbesian Dick Cheney — who has been down in his undisclosed locations reading books about how war is the natural state of mankind — the flamboyantly belligerent Rummy and the crusading neo-cons have mesmerized the president with their macho schemes.

"There is a behind-the-scenes effort by former senior Republican government officials and party leaders to convince President Bush that the advice he has received from Vice President Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz . . . has been wrong and even dangerous to long-term U.S. national interests," The Post said.

One former senior Republican official noted: "The only one who can reach the president is his father. But it is not timely yet to talk to him." This raised the odd specter of the president's being dragged off from running a war and taken to Kennebunkport for a Metternichian outing in the family cigarette boat. Mr. Scowcroft and Mr. Eagleburger could pin W. down while Bar steered and Poppy explained the facts of international life.

The Oedipal struggle of the Bushes — a father who was an ambassador to the U.N. and an envoy to China, a globe-trotting vice president and an internationalist president, and a son who was a Texas governor with little knowledge of the world — was bound to be aggravated by an invasion of Iraq not sanctioned by the U.N.

Here was a son acting to correct his father's "mistakes" in the first gulf war, when his father did not think he had made a mistake, but rather a great contribution to history.

The neo-cons egged on 43 to war in Iraq by writing, as Mr. Kristol and Mr. Kaplan did, that 41's foreign policy was "defective" and that Bush senior had urged Iraqi Shiites and Kurds to revolt and then, afraid that Iraq would break up, turned "a blind eye" when they did that after the war and were slaughtered by Saddam.

When the Iraqi Shiites did not greet U.S. soldiers with flowers and hugs last week, as the hawks had promised, the stung warriors once more blamed Bush 41. "We bear a certain responsibility for what we didn't do in 1991," a senior U.S. military commander at Central Command in Qatar told reporters. "We let them down once. We're not going to do it again."

Bush 43 is busy trying to do something his dad thought he'd done. The title of Bush 41's book: "A World Transformed."


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraqifreedom; quagmire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Wednesday, April 9, 2003

Quote of the Day by Aeronaut

1 posted on 04/09/2003 5:03:35 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

GOD BLESS OUR MILITARY
THANK A VET!
MAKE A DONATION TODAY

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


~~STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD~~



2 posted on 04/09/2003 5:04:43 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good show! We need to remind ourselves what defeatist Clymers the lamestream media has been.
3 posted on 04/09/2003 5:04:57 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This is a bitter woman, sort of a helen thomas wannabe
4 posted on 04/09/2003 5:05:38 AM PDT by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
And this piece of tripe, now utterly discredited by events, was written only a week ago. ;)
5 posted on 04/09/2003 5:06:04 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Maureen Dowd....

breakfast....

Nope, they just don't go together! ;-)

Maureen... haven't you heard? There IS a party in Baghdad, now that the people are certain Saddam's regime is dead... :-)
6 posted on 04/09/2003 5:08:25 AM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We are a peaceful people. Yet we are not a fragile people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Poor Liberals! No high body count among Coalition forces, and no "quagmire." Whatever will they whine about?
7 posted on 04/09/2003 5:10:34 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
How much mental anguish is happening right now here at home among the anti-American left? We're reading these stories about the Iraqi colonel and the foreign fedayeen who, having been lied to by Al-Ja and others, got slapped in the face by reality upon encountering U.S. troops.

How much will this same sort of thing, on a smaller scale, slap the Left? This article is representative of the press they read. I wonder about their reaction to the inaccuracy of "their" media.
8 posted on 04/09/2003 5:14:34 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
bump!
9 posted on 04/09/2003 5:15:28 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sticker
LOL, this is a Helen Thomas 'gonna be'. No doubt about it.

Isn't this funny, she thinks the going to war and how the war is conducted has NOTHING to do with the enemy! What a gal!
10 posted on 04/09/2003 5:15:49 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Bull's-eye, friend.
11 posted on 04/09/2003 5:16:08 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
...Here was a son acting to correct his father's "mistakes" in the first gulf war...

No Mz Dowd, here is a President with moral convictions. I'm not surprised you missed it.

12 posted on 04/09/2003 5:16:51 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (Saddam is a dead man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; hellinahandcart; KLT; countrydummy
"...the flamboyantly belligerent Rummy and the crusading neo-cons have mesmerized the president with their macho schemes."

Seems this woman has run out of batteries and Jack Daniels again...

Another lonely Friday night, eh Mo?

13 posted on 04/09/2003 5:17:37 AM PDT by sauropod (I'm a man... But I can change... If I have to.... I guess...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Oh my. Some of them haven't gotten the word that wishing something doesn't make it so. Otherwise, the Democratic Party would be in full control and the American people would be in full subjugation...
14 posted on 04/09/2003 5:29:00 AM PDT by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
maybe someone should email her the Al Jazerrah account posted on FR ...
15 posted on 04/09/2003 5:33:49 AM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
But you can't have transformation without provocation.

Sept 11. 2001

This was a war designed to change the nature of American foreign policy

THIS war is a correction of NO foreign policy during the Klintoon years.

Democrats are muter than mute

Ever hear of Sen. Kerry, Dashole,Conyers and many more "Dem's" who are mute?!

and a son who was a Texas governor with little knowledge of the world

And I suppose Klintoon had ALL the knowlage in regard to the world as he was getting "serviced" by his interns and selling us out to China! Klintoon foreign policy can be summed up in this statement, "Them foreign girls sure do give good "negotiations"!

Sorry for the rant but as far as I believe GW is dealing with the mess from the Klintoon administration and all the dirt left over from the most corrupt administration in the history of the US.

16 posted on 04/09/2003 5:47:53 AM PDT by jedi150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jedi150
LETS REMEMBER ALL THOSE THAT DID EVERYTHING THEY COULD TO KEEP SADDAM IN POWER..FRANCE, GERMANY, RUSSIA, THE UN AND THE SCUMMY democRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..ps..should democRATS be allowed to serve in the US military?
17 posted on 04/09/2003 5:51:25 AM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
How much mental anguish is happening right now here at home among the anti-American left?

Grinding their teeth into stumps as events prove once again that their "mental midget" president ain't so dumb after all. bwahahahahahahah

18 posted on 04/09/2003 6:00:59 AM PDT by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
LOL! Brutal, and accurate.
19 posted on 04/09/2003 6:02:45 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
"This was a war designed to change the nature of American foreign policy, military policy and even the national character — flushing out ambivalence and embracing absolutism." Poor Ms. Dowd who, like all her liberal compatriots, misses the point in their frantic attempt to be "piercing, probing etc." The war was undertaken to rid the Iraqi regime of weapons that could bring death and destruction to Americans, period. All of the secondary benefits are great but the overarching reason was to protect Americans. What is so hard to understand?
20 posted on 04/09/2003 6:12:23 AM PDT by AZFolks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson