Skip to comments.
MSNBC: Iraq Republican Guard claims Saddam and son "Seriously Injured," Other son dead
MSNBC
| April 9, 2003
Posted on 04/09/2003 2:47:59 AM PDT by Timesink
more to follow
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: decapitation; saddamdeathwatch; topplesaddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 last
To: El Gato; Poohbah
One - with a "crowd pleaser".
81
posted on
04/09/2003 12:54:51 PM PDT
by
hchutch
("But tonight we get EVEN!" - Ice-T)
To: hchutch
Actually, B-1Bs don't carry the crowd pleasers.
It'd be a B-2.
Better hope that Major Vic Deakins ain't flying the mission :o)
82
posted on
04/09/2003 1:06:14 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: YaYa123
Vice Presidential bitch slap.When the VICE President says you are irrelevant, you are IRRELEVANT!
83
posted on
04/09/2003 5:19:17 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: randita
I heard that Batchelor & Alexander show. But it doesn't make sense, if the CIA knows for sure Saddam was killed on 3/19, why even bother with the intercept and the B1 strike on the restaurant? If we knew Saddam was already dead, why go for the second strike to kill him?
To: oceanview
I don't know that the CIA knows for sure they got him on 3/19. A lot of evidence pointed to that. Without certainty, I assume they had to proceed as if he were still alive. Also Loftus said we were lured to strike the restaurant because of a taped conversation including SH which was played over the phone. I guess we couldn't take the chance it wasn't SH speaking live.
85
posted on
04/09/2003 5:57:12 PM PDT
by
randita
To: Timesink
O wondered when they reported bombing a house a couple days ago.
Any follow-up!
If this is true -- Hooray for Bush -- He should go up in the ratings about 20 points!
86
posted on
09/26/2003 9:21:44 AM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: randita; Timesink
Now I see that this is an old thread.
Hmmmm.
87
posted on
09/26/2003 9:23:48 AM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Salvation
What made you dig this thread up?
88
posted on
09/26/2003 9:25:14 AM PDT
by
boxerblues
(God Bless the 101st, stay safe, stay armed and watch your backs)
To: boxerblues
I didn't. It just appeared on my screen when I refreshed it for the Latest News.
Strange, huh?
89
posted on
09/26/2003 9:46:03 AM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson