Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When antiwar speech turns seditious (Michelle Malkin)
townhall ^ | April 9, 2003 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 04/08/2003 9:41:28 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

When antiwar speech turns seditious

They've trashed 9-11 memorials. Blocked streets. Burned flags. Shut down bridges. Marched on Broadway. And trampled across the National Mall.

They've thrown stones at a uniformed female member of the Vermont National Guard, and hurled pie at a Bay Area television reporter deemed too pro-war.

They've carried signs that read "We support our troops when they shoot their own officers" and "Don't impeach Bush . . . execute him."

They've publicly wished for "a million Mogadishus" and privately hoped for 100 new bin Ladens.

They've issued manifestos calling for sabotage of military establishments in the name of peace. They've organized "die-ins" in the name of justice. And they've conducted "vomit-fests" to uphold their warped view of the American way.

The antiwar mobsters have gotten away with all this and more. But on Monday, one city finally drew the line.

In Oakland, Calif., local police arrested dozens of antiwar activists who flouted their free-speech rights in a treacherous attempt to shut down a port involved in shipping military supplies to soldiers during wartime. Elsewhere in the Bay Area, several others were cited for crossing a police line outside the Concord Naval Weapons Station; seven more face felony charges for stopping traffic nearby on Interstate 280.

Oakland officials say that the self-proclaimed pacifists, who still fancy themselves the righteous heirs of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., hurled concrete, wood, and iron bolts at cops. In self-defense, the outnumbered police fired appropriately named "dummy" bullets, sting balls, and bean bags at the unruly crowds.

Sporting grapefruit-sized welts and bruises -- their very own red badges of incorrigibility! -- the Oakland rabble-rousers wheedled that the cops were too "aggressive."

"I've never seen this level of violence in response to a community picket," complained David Solnit, a "veteran of two decades of civil disobedience" who helped coordinate Monday's blockade through an outfit called Direct Action to Stop the War.

But this was not your organic garden-variety "community picket."

The antiwar obstructionists did not set out simply to exercise their own free speech. They set out deliberately and specifically to prevent private businesses from fulfilling their federal contracts with the Department of Defense and U.S. Agency for International Development related to the war and post-war reconstruction in Iraq.

Cyprus Gonzalez, 19, of Oakland, who was struck during the port melee, made his and his antiwar collaborators' intentions clear: "It's direct. Here, we're actually trying to shut the place down for a day, to take a strike straight at the actual machine of the war."

The antiwar mob's primary target at the Port of Oakland was American President Lines, a longtime carrier of military cargo. According to the firm, all but two of the company's ships went into military service during World War I. In World War II, the company controlled hundreds of Liberty and Victory ships that carried troops and ammunition through enemy waters. APL provided converted commercial ships for the first Gulf War. And for Operation Iraqi Freedom, the carrier has made nine of its vessels available to the DOD in order to move ammunition and sustainment cargo to support U.S. military forces.

The Oakland punks weren't simply standing on the sidewalks outside APL chanting their mindless antiwar slogans. They were blocking its trucks, employees, entryways, and streets in order to stop the shipment of things like bullets, rations, lubricants, medical supplies, repair parts and chemical defense equipment to our troops.

These bolt-throwing peaceniks also targeted Stevedoring Services of America, which recently won a contract for assessment and a year's operation of the Port of Umm Qasr in Iraq. The firm will also handle 3 million tons of humanitarian aid.

So in addition to trying to block ammo and gas masks for our soldiers, the antiwar extremists also took a bold stand against sending food and medicine to Iraqi civilians.

Nice going, do-gooders.

Make no mistake: This continued campaign of "direct action" against private businesses and military establishments is not antiwar speech. It's anti-soldier, anti-cop, anti-American sedition. The Oakland police deserve medals of honor for appreciating the difference.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; anarchist; anarchy; antiamerican; antibush; anticop; antisoldier; antiwar; barbarians; clintonlegacy; lawlessness; lovedclintonswars; michellemalkin; notapeacemovement; oaklandpolice; obstructionists; prosaddam; publicschoolidiots; sedition; seditious; spoiledrichbrats; thugs; traitor; traitors; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last
To: kms61
Just who at Ruby Ridge or Waco was threatening anyone or interfering with a military shipment?

Your hypocracy is showing.
101 posted on 04/10/2003 11:21:28 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
Oh please. The connection is that at Ruby Ridge and Waco deadly force was used far beyond what was necessary to deal with the situation.

The same would have been true if deadly force had been used at Oakland. That so many people here apparently don't understand that is truly disturbing.
102 posted on 04/10/2003 11:29:06 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: kms61
Thanks for that post. I thought both Ruby Ridge and Waco were disgusting acts by our government regardless of the weirdo views the victims held. They were both outrageous acts of murder by our government. I hate hypocrisy above all. And there is so much on this site these days it makes me sick.
103 posted on 04/10/2003 11:53:45 PM PDT by Burkeman1 (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
I agree.
104 posted on 04/11/2003 12:01:32 AM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: kms61
I agree that if deadly force had been used on the saboteurs in Oakland, it would have produced negative PR ratings for several government entities. The fact remains that their actions warrant, at the very least, arrest, trial, and imprisonment for sabotage. Resisting attempts to stop the sabotage would justify the use of deadly force, IMO.

The people in Ruby Ridge and Waco were minding their own business and presented no threat to any government, citizen, or commercial entity. In both those situations, government agents initiated the shooting and killing where no threat or protest existed, and no crimes were taking place.

...deadly force was used far beyond what was necessary to deal with the situation.

Just how much force should be used to stop people from minding their own business and wanting to be left alone?

105 posted on 04/11/2003 12:04:35 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson