Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy axes BBC from ship
The Sun ^ | April 08, 2003 | Richard Hargreaves

Posted on 04/08/2003 6:05:08 PM PDT by Dog Gone

From Richard Hargreaves, of The News, Portsmouth
- on board HMS Ark Royal

MILITARY leaders have axed the BBC from the nation's flagship amid claims of pro-Iraqi bias.

The Navy has taken rolling news show News 24 off the air on the HMS Ark Royal after weeks of grumbling from crew.

Sailors on the Portsmouth-based aircraft carrier have become increasingly disenchanted with the BBC's slant on the war.

They claim the news organisation places more faith in Iraqi reports than information coming from British or Allied sources.

"The BBC always takes the Iraqis' side," one senior rating complained.

"It reports what they say as gospel but when it comes to us it questions and doubts everything the British and Americans are reporting.

"A lot of people on board are very unhappy."

Ark is one of a handful of task force ships which receives live TV direct from Britain with rolling news and two entertainment channels beamed into the warship as part of efforts to improve creature comforts.

But officers and ratings alike are angry at the Beeb's coverage of the war so far.

A BBC correspondent has been on board the flagship - and the crew have no gripe with his reports - but they were particularly incensed by comments made by presenters and  commentators about the carrier's Sea King tragedy a fortnight ago.

Then the BBC suggested poor levels of maintenance played a hand in the deaths of seven fliers.

News 24 was switched off on Sunday and replaced with Sky News.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bbc; embeddedreport; hmsarkroyal; iraqifreedom; journalism; media; mediabias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2003 6:05:08 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The BBC are pecksniffian poltroons. At least Al-Jazeera doesn't pretend to be your countryman.
2 posted on 04/08/2003 6:07:45 PM PDT by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Sailors on the Portsmouth-based aircraft carrier have become increasingly disenchanted with the BBC's slant on the war.

Theres a lot of this going on. Hmmmmmmmmm...........

3 posted on 04/08/2003 6:07:49 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (FReepers.....An army to be reckoned with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Fantastic. I hope these sailors manage to get the truth out to the general public in the UK. They should be outraged at the anti-American, anti-British bias that they are paying for with their taxes. The BBC really, really sucks.
4 posted on 04/08/2003 6:10:38 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
"The BBC are pecksniffian poltroons. "

You been taking lessons from Baghdad Bob Lexington??? ;-)
5 posted on 04/08/2003 6:12:36 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I wish NPR wouldn't broadcast the BBC. Or to restate it, I wish they wouldn't use my TAX dollars to broadcast that left wing propaganda.
6 posted on 04/08/2003 6:15:17 PM PDT by Drango (Two wrongs don't make a right...but three lefts do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
A tangent point: At the Pentagon briefing today the first questioner whined, "You said your troops were only taking small-arms fire from the Palestine Hotel, where journalists are staying, but you responded with a tank shell. Do you really think that's an appropriate response".

GRRR!! No outrage that the Iraqis would use the hotel to shoot at our guys, only outrage that we would respond. It seems to me that a high percentage of the questions are NOT about the operations but are designed to try to show the military in a bad light.
7 posted on 04/08/2003 6:15:34 PM PDT by libertylover (Is he dead yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
News 24 was switched off on Sunday and replaced with Sky News.

Cool - FNC's sister station.

8 posted on 04/08/2003 6:18:02 PM PDT by CheneyChick (Lock & Load)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
Text of an e-mail I sent to the BBC yesterday:

"You are not even pretending to be unbiased. The sequence, selective omissions, and implications of the photo series here collectively represent one of the crudest and most obvious examples of totalitarian propaganda since the time of Joseph Goebbels. You are a totalitarian fraud and complicit in Saddam Hussein's crimes by using your priveleged position to defend his regime."

9 posted on 04/08/2003 6:19:03 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Anti-war movement: road-kill on the highway to freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: konaice
You been taking lessons from Baghdad Bob Lexington?

Bob would have said "perfidious pecksniffian poltroons".. but I like to save that triple aliteration for France.
10 posted on 04/08/2003 6:24:06 PM PDT by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
Before this war, I had about given up on the UK. Now, I'm sure there's hope.
11 posted on 04/08/2003 6:29:57 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
Only taking small arms fire and responding with tank. I remember when I was fighting in the Battle of Hue during the Tet Offensive being shot at by a sniper in a tower. An Ontos, which is a little vehicle with a bunch of 105 recoilless rifles happened by just at the moment. I zipped over and pointed out the target and the Marines did zap that bad boy and the tower too. Unfortunately, there is no record that any press were in the tower, but the press goes where the battle is at their own peril and there are no circumstances during a battle when they ought to be given any consideration. One reporter is never worth one Marine.
12 posted on 04/08/2003 6:30:09 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Someone needs to gobsmack the BBC.
13 posted on 04/08/2003 6:33:56 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (Saddam is a dead man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
Well stated. Pretty apparent too.
14 posted on 04/08/2003 6:35:59 PM PDT by cadillac cowboy (lifelong tax slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mathurine
Talk to Christiane Amanpour.Charty from Sky news needs a word ,too.BBC is hurting the morale of their own. I hope someone talks to these fifth columists and reminds them in wartime we are not buying their brand of objectivity.
15 posted on 04/08/2003 6:42:24 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Chater
16 posted on 04/08/2003 6:45:57 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
What adds to that hope for me is the fact that the young men of this ship will, from here out, distrust the BBC and when they get home will influence their friends and families likewise.

It means that a certain segment of Brit Society will tune out and become exempt from the biased influence of the BBC.
I fervently hope that more and more Brits will join Americans in tuning out and opting out of the media elitist planned model for our nations.

My only remaining wish is that Murdoch does not prove to be a Judas goat.
17 posted on 04/08/2003 6:46:54 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: konaice
Re: Bagdad "Bob"

I heard it suggested this am that we change the reference to Bagdad "Bill" with the obvious reference to another pervericator.
Sounds good to me.
What say ye?
18 posted on 04/08/2003 6:50:25 PM PDT by MIgramma (FEAR= False Evidence Alleged Real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: konaice
Re: Bagdad "Bob"

I heard it suggested this am that we change the reference to Bagdad "Bill" with the obvious reference to another pervericator.
Sounds good to me.
What say ye?
19 posted on 04/08/2003 6:56:03 PM PDT by MIgramma (FEAR= False Evidence Alleged Real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
David Chater has gotten increasingly worse as this war has progressed. His reports increasingly focus on civilian casualties. As far as I know, he's seen few, and only those the Iraqi handlers have shown him.

Of course, he was mighty angry with the Americans for firing at the Palestine hotel last night.

20 posted on 04/08/2003 6:57:34 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson