Skip to comments.
Sandia Scientists Confirm; Huge Pulsed Power Machine Enters Fusion Arena!!!
Science Daily ^
| 2003-04-07
| Editorial Staff
Posted on 04/07/2003 4:26:58 PM PDT by vannrox
Z Produces Fusion Neutrons, Sandia Scientists Confirm; Huge Pulsed Power Machine Enters Fusion Arena
PHILADELPHIA, Pa. (April 7, 2003) -- Throwing its hat into the ring of machines that offer the possibility of achieving controlled nuclear fusion, Sandia National Laboratories' Z machine has created a hot dense plasma that produces thermonuclear neutrons, Sandia researchers announced today at a news conference at the April meeting of the American Physical Society in Philadelphia.
The neutrons emanate from fusion reactions within a BB-sized deuterium capsule placed within the target of the huge machine. Compressing hot dense plasmas that produce neutrons is an important step toward realizing ignition, the level at which the fusion reaction becomes self-sustaining.
The amount of energy a larger successor to Z could bring to bear offers the still-later possibility of high-yield fusion -- the state in which much more energy is released than is needed to provoke the reaction initially to occur. The excess energy could be used for applications such as the generation of electricity, said Tom Mehlhorn, a project leader on the machine.
Z causes reactions to occur neither by confining low density plasmas in dimensionally huge magnetic fields, as do tokomaks, nor by focusing intense laser beams on or around a target, as in laser fusion, but simply through the application of huge pulses of electricity applied with very sophisticated timing. The pulse creates an intense magnetic field that crushes tungsten wires into a foam cylinder to produce X-rays. The X-ray energy, striking the surface of the target capsule embedded in the cylinder, produces a shock wave that compresses the deuterium within the capsule, fusing enough deuterium to produce neutrons.
"Pulsed power electrical systems have always been energy-rich but power-poor," said Ray Leeper, a Sandia manager. "That is, we can deliver a lot of energy, but it wasn't clear we could concentrate it on a small enough area to create fusion. Now it seems clear we can do that."
A partial confirmation of the result came about when theoretical predictions and lab outcomes were determined to be of the same order of magnitude. Predictions and measurements of the neutron yield were both of the order of 10 billion neutrons. The predicted neutron yield depends on the ion density temperature and volume. Those quantities were independently confirmed by X-ray spectroscopy measurements.
Neutron pulses were observed as early as last summer but researchers were wary that the output was produced by interactions between the target and ions generated by Z's processes, rather than within the capsule itself.
Ion-generated neutrons were not the point of the experiment, since they would not scale up into a high-yield event in any later, more powerful version of Z.
But a series of experiments completed in late March demonstrated that the production was within the capsule itself. To show this, researchers inserted xenon gas within the capsule. The gas prevented the capsule from getting hot during compression. Thus, the neutron yield dropped dramatically, as predicted.
The action takes place within a container the size of a pencil eraser, called a hohlraum, at the center of the Z machine, itself a circular device about 120 feet in diameter.
Sandia researchers Jim Bailey and Gordon Chandler led the experimental team and Steve Slutz performed theortical calculations. Sandian Carlos Ruiz and Gary Cooper of the University of New Mexico performed the neutron measurements.
Editor's Note: The original news release can be found here.
Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued for journalists and other members of the public. If you wish to quote any part of this story, please credit Sandia National Laboratories as the original source. You may also wish to include the following link in any citation:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/04/030407073625.htm
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 121gigawatts; atom; atomic; discovery; energy; energylist; fission; fluxcapacitor; fusion; iter; light; nuclear; power; radiation; realscience; science; techindex; technology; unlimited
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
This is exciting news!
1
posted on
04/07/2003 4:26:58 PM PDT
by
vannrox
To: vannrox
Fusion (of any sort) BUMP!
2
posted on
04/07/2003 4:28:35 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: vannrox
This is cool stuff. If these dudes would hire me I'd hitchhike out there in a heartbeat. I talked to somebody a few months back who was researching plasma density localization via oscillating B-fields...
3
posted on
04/07/2003 4:32:05 PM PDT
by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: vannrox
Note to Saudi Arabia.
4
posted on
04/07/2003 4:33:01 PM PDT
by
PokeyJoe
(BBQ Iraqi Pork Ribs for Dinner.)
To: PokeyJoe
Fish carburetor ?
To: vannrox
This stuff is so far over my head, I feel a sudden urge to "Duck and Cover".
6
posted on
04/07/2003 4:39:42 PM PDT
by
Migraine
(...that really goes against migraine!)
To: Migraine
So, we can begin to see gas prices fall at the pump soon?
To: vannrox
So this will work to compact and excite deuterium, producing fusion reaction?
How much radiation is released?
8
posted on
04/07/2003 4:43:14 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
To: vannrox
Sounds alot like the 2 stage H-bombs of the early 60's.
They also used heated foam to generate X-rays to compress Deuterium. Interesting!
9
posted on
04/07/2003 4:44:04 PM PDT
by
Zathras
To: Zathras
That's actually a common misperception.
The foam didn't react appreciably--it was used because it was relatively transparent to X-Rays, but could be cut easily into whatever shape was necessary to support the components and keep them aligned.
10
posted on
04/07/2003 4:46:24 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: princess leah
I thought Lyndon LaRouche's scientist friends licked the fusion problem in 1985? Someone should have told Sandia physicists huh?
11
posted on
04/07/2003 4:47:02 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
To: Poohbah
Time to but stock in deuterium, much like I enjoyed that brief palladium up-spike in 1981. Somehow history keeps repeating itself.
When I can run my chainsaw on it.....I'll buy the idea.
12
posted on
04/07/2003 4:50:06 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
To: blackdog
No, they just designed an X-Ray laser for his personal doomsday weapon :o)
13
posted on
04/07/2003 4:50:34 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: *Energy_List; *RealScience; *tech_index; sourcery; Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: maxwell
Can you explain to me what happens after ignition?
15
posted on
04/07/2003 4:59:15 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(I predict hysteria at the UN)
To: vannrox
kool! just in time too. we've just begun to study nuclear physics in my physics class.
16
posted on
04/07/2003 4:59:44 PM PDT
by
swaimh
(Venimus, vidimus, vicimus: we came, we saw, we conquered [saddam, that is])
To: blackdog
I thought Lyndon LaRouche's scientist friends licked the fusion problem in 1985? Someone should have told Sandia physicists huh?
No, those scientists featured in Fusion were legitimate. The reporting of their research was used by LL in Fusion to legitimize and push his agenda. He did the same thing with the strategic defense initiative. I read about it first in Fusion.
I remember once seeing a photo published in Fusion of a Fusion employee that supposedly taken with a particular fusion scientist at some function. The LL Fusion employee was standing there grinning at the camera and the scientist had a really surprised look like, "Who the hell is this person standing next to me getting her picture taken?" It was obviously not a photograph of a couple of people who knew each other and were talking. For some reason I think the woman's name was Marsha. I remember writing to her and saying that I enjoyed reading about developments around the world in fusion, but that I thought LL's approach to the economy was rather dirigiste. She replied in a somewhat hysterical tone asking me why I said that.
17
posted on
04/07/2003 5:12:26 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: vannrox
Excellent news - and great find. Thanks for posting!
BTTT
18
posted on
04/07/2003 5:15:52 PM PDT
by
11B3
(.308 holes make invisible souls. Belt fed liberal eraser.)
To: vannrox
Later read.
19
posted on
04/07/2003 5:24:22 PM PDT
by
Diddley
(I'm a man of few words.)
To: vannrox
bump
20
posted on
04/07/2003 5:24:24 PM PDT
by
Captain Beyond
(The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson