Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'10 minutes of the most intense fighting' (good read for tread heads)
cnn.com (I know, I know) ^ | Sunday, April 6, 2003 Posted: 1:38 AM EST (0638 GMT) | Walter Rodgers

Posted on 04/06/2003 7:09:15 PM PDT by Blueflag

Despite being outnumbered, the U.S. group vanquished the Iraqi Republican Guard force within minutes, thanks to superior armed vehicles and devastatingly powerful ammunition.

"My commander called me, gave me the warning order to be prepared to conduct an attack on 22 stationary T-72s [Soviet-built tanks used by the Iraqis] that the [U.S.] Air Force had identified," Lyle said.

"I selected a force, tank heavy, almost all the tanks in my troop, with some Bradleys [armored fighting vehicles] to go with it."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cas; embeddedreport; groundassault; gutsandglory; iraqifreedom; m1a1; republicanguard; superior; t72; waltrodgers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Good read about how the tankers 'attritted' dug in T-72s at long range.
1 posted on 04/06/2003 7:09:15 PM PDT by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
U.S. Bradley fighting vehicles, despite being lighter, wiped out some of the Soviet-vintage T-72 tanks, a significant military milestone.

Insult compounding injury. Can't help the chuckle.

2 posted on 04/06/2003 7:15:08 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
Also, doing simple math -- If they eliminated 20 tanks and were outnumbered 2-to-1, they likely had about 10 Abrams and 2 Bradleys.

So, ten minutes to maneuver, acquire, shoot, maneuver, re-acquire (etc.) is mighty fine shootin'!

Wonder why the Air Force didn't put the ordinance on them when they spotted 'em? Or call in artillery? Seems to me they wanted the guys to have a live fire exercise. So be it.
3 posted on 04/06/2003 7:19:01 PM PDT by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Wowsers!

A_R

4 posted on 04/06/2003 7:19:26 PM PDT by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Yes, and thank God for chobom armor. It deflects sabot rounds like lawn darts.
5 posted on 04/06/2003 7:22:37 PM PDT by Archangelsk (Train, maintain, rest...what don't you understand, Lieutenant?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
What's cheaper? DU shells or bombs?
6 posted on 04/06/2003 7:24:44 PM PDT by Krafty123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
The Iraqis haven't seen anything yet. Just wait until the 4ID comes on the scene! The 4th is the most advanced infantry division in the world.
7 posted on 04/06/2003 7:24:56 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (California wine beats French wine in blind taste tests. Boycott French wine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
The main gun rounds from the Iraqi tanks, for the most part, fell short or flew too high, Lyle said.

Another technologic wonder of the M-1A1 is the ability to do combat boresighting while flying along at 50 MPH. The poor - and now dead - Iraqis probably had the old manual devices that are useless in combat.

8 posted on 04/06/2003 7:26:45 PM PDT by Archangelsk (Train, maintain, rest...what don't you understand, Lieutenant?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
4ID is on its way to Tikrit, to play in Saddam's home town. Doesn't the 4ID have M1-A2s also?
9 posted on 04/06/2003 7:27:14 PM PDT by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
At the bottom of the article:

> EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was written in accordance with
> Pentagon ground rules allowing so-called embedded
> reporting, in which journalists join deployed troops.
> Among the rules accepted by all participating news
> organizations is an agreement not to disclose sensitive
> operational details.

What is/was CNN's disclaimer for the "independent" reporters
filing stories from downtown Baghdad, at all time overseen
by "minders"?

Thought so.
10 posted on 04/06/2003 7:27:41 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
"The poor - and now dead - Iraqis probably had the old manual devices that are useless in combat."

You bet! And when's the last time those poor sods got to light off a few rounds, let alone fire at a moving target. Face it, the Iraqis could barely see what they were aiming at from defillated positions, and didn't have the training, munitions, skills or weapons to win the battle. I love an unfair tank fight.

11 posted on 04/06/2003 7:30:50 PM PDT by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Bump!!
12 posted on 04/06/2003 7:31:25 PM PDT by SAMWolf (Senator Daschle is planning to go to Iraq to help roll bandages for Saddam's Republican Guard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AriOxman
A DU round for a 75MM chain gun would be MUCH cheaper than any guided HEAT munition the USAF would offer up. An old Viet Nam-era 500lb iron bomb might be cheaper...
13 posted on 04/06/2003 7:33:59 PM PDT by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
You bet! And when's the last time those poor sods got to light off a few rounds, let alone fire at a moving target. Face it, the Iraqis could barely see what they were aiming at from defillated positions, and didn't have the training, munitions, skills or weapons to win the battle. I love an unfair tank fight.

Ever try to lead an M-1A1 going full bore? If the Iraqi T-72s still had the old Russian analog sighting systems their best bet was to abandon tank and get some cover before the turbo DU splashed their turrets. I don't think the Russians sold them laser sighting systems or the fire control computers that could instantaneously get a solution.

14 posted on 04/06/2003 7:36:38 PM PDT by Archangelsk (Train, maintain, rest...what don't you understand, Lieutenant?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Doesn't the 4ID have M1-A2s also?

They do. Anyone have any kind of breakdown of the difference between the 1's and the 2's?
15 posted on 04/06/2003 7:39:05 PM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Daus
They do. Anyone have any kind of breakdown of the difference between the 1's and the 2's?

My guess is that the 2's probably have the next generation of TIS and integrated GPS systems. I've been out of the armor loop for awhile so that's just a SWAG.

16 posted on 04/06/2003 7:41:28 PM PDT by Archangelsk (Train, maintain, rest...what don't you understand, Lieutenant?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Daus
From http://www.army-technology.com/projects/abrams/index.html



M1A1 / M1A2 ABRAMS MAIN BATTLE TANK, USA
The M1A1/2 Abrams main battle tank is manufactured by General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS). The first M1 tank was produced in 1978, the M1A1 in 1985 and the M1A2 in 1986. 3,273 M1 tanks were produced for the US Army. 4,796 M1A1 tanks were built for the US Army, 221 for the US Marines and 555 co-produced with Egypt. Egypt has ordered a further 200 M1A1 tanks with production to continue to 2005. 77 M1A2 tanks have been built for the US Army, 315 for Saudi Arabia and 218 for Kuwait. For the M1A2 Upgrade Program, over 600 M1 Abrams tanks are being upgraded to M1A2 configuration. Deliveries began in 1998.

M1A2 SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PACKAGE (SEP)
In February 2001, GDLS were contracted to supply 240 M1A2 tanks with a system enhancement package (SEP) by 2004. The M1A2 SEP contains an embedded version of the US Army's Force XXI command and control architecture; new Raytheon Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer (CITV) with second generation thermal imager; commander's display for digital colour terrain maps; DRS Techologies second generation GEN II TIS thermal imaging gunner’s sight with increased range; driver's integrated display and thermal management system. The US Army planned to procure a total of 1150 M1A2 SEP tanks but the US Army has decided to cancel future production of the M1A2 SEP from FY2004.

Under the Firepower Enhancement Package (FEP), DRS Techologies has also been awarded a contract for the GEN II TIS to upgrade US Marine Corps M1A1 tanks. GEN II TIS is based on the 480 x 4 SADA (Standard Advanced Dewar Assembly) detector.

M1 ABRAMS ARMAMENT
The main armament is the 120mm M256 smoothbore gun, developed by Rheinmetall GmbH of Germany. The 120mm gun fires the following ammunition: the M865 TPCSDS-T and M831 TP-T training rounds, the M8300 HEAT-MP-T and the M829 APFSDS-T which includes a depleted uranium penetrator. Textron Systems provides the Cadillac Gage gun turret drive stabilisation system.

The commander has a 12.7mm Browning M2 machine gun and the loader has a 7.62mm M240 machine gun. A 7.62mm M240 machine gun is also mounted coaxially on the right hand side of the main armament.

DEPLETED URANIUM ARMOUR
The M1A1 tank incorporates steel encased depleted uranium armour. Armour bulkheads separate the crew compartment from the fuel tanks. The top panels of the tank are designed to blow outwards in the event of penetration by a HEAT projectile. The tank is protected against nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) warfare.

One L8A1 six-barrelled smoke grenade discharger is fitted on each side of the turret. A smoke screen can also be laid by an engine operated system.

FIRE CONTROL AND OBSERVATION

The commander's station is equipped with six periscopes, providing 360 degree view. The Raytheon Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer (CITV) provides the commander with independent stabilised day and night vision with a 360 degree view, automatic sector scanning, automatic target cueing of the gunner's sight and back-up fire control.

The M1A2 Abrams tank has a two-axis Raytheon Gunner's Primary Sight- Line of Sight (GPS-LOS) which increases the first round hit probability by providing faster target acquisition and improved gun pointing. The Thermal Imaging System (TIS) has magnification x10 narrow field of view and x3 wide field of view. The thermal image is displayed in the eyepiece of the gunner's sight together with the range measurement from a laser rangefinder. The Northrop Grumman (formerly Litton) Laser Systems Eyesafe Laser Rangefinder (ELRF) has a range accuracy to within 10m and target discrimination of 20m. The gunner also has a Kollmorgen Model 939 auxiliary sight with magnification x8 and field of view 8 degrees.

The digital fire control computer is supplied by General Dynamics - Canada (formerly Computing Devices Canada). The fire control computer automatically calculates the fire control solution based on: lead angle measurement; bend of the gun measured by the muzzle reference system; velocity measurement from a wind sensor on the roof of the turret; data from a pendulum static cant sensor located at the centre of the turret roof. The operator manually inputs data on ammunition type, temperature, and barometric pressure.

The driver has either three observation periscopes or two periscopes on either side and a central image intensifying periscope for night vision. The periscopes provide 120 degrees field of view. The DRS Technologies Driver's Vision Enhancer (DVE), AN/VSS-5, is based on a 328 x 245 element uncooled infrared detector array, operating in the 7.5 to 13 micron waveband. A Raytheon Driver's Thermal Viewer, AN/VAS-3, is installed on the M1A2 Abrams tanks for Kuwait.

PROPULSION

The M1 is equipped with a Honeywell AGT 1500 gas turbine engine. The Allison X-1100-3B transmission provides four forward and two reverse gears. The US Army has selected Honeywell International Engines and Systems and General Electric to develop a new LV100-5 gas turbine engine for the M1A2. The new engine is lighter and smaller with rapid acceleration, quieter running and no visible exhaust.


17 posted on 04/06/2003 7:44:58 PM PDT by Gamecock (As seen on Taglinus FreeRepublicus - 5th Edition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Under the Firepower Enhancement Package (FEP), DRS Techologies has also been awarded a contract for the GEN II TIS to upgrade US Marine Corps M1A1 tanks. GEN II TIS is based on the 480 x 4 SADA (Standard Advanced Dewar Assembly) detector.

Gee, I love it when I'm partly right. :-)

18 posted on 04/06/2003 7:47:11 PM PDT by Archangelsk (Train, maintain, rest...what don't you understand, Lieutenant?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
What an awesome piece of machinery.
19 posted on 04/06/2003 7:47:53 PM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Thanks. :)
20 posted on 04/06/2003 7:49:18 PM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson