Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US begins the process of 'regime change' - NEW GOVERNMENT FOR IRAQ, EARLY AS TUESDAY
UK Observer via Drudge ^ | Sunday April 6, 2003 | Ed Vulliamy in New York and Kamal Ahmed

Posted on 04/06/2003 1:32:13 PM PDT by elfman2

US begins the process of 'regime change'

Ed Vulliamy in New York and Kamal Ahmed
Sunday April 6, 2003
The Observer


The US is ready to install the first leg of an interim government for the new Iraq as early as Tuesday, even while fighting still rages in Baghdad, officials said yesterday.

America's readiness to establish the first stages of a civil administration to run post-war Iraq comes at lightning speed and constitutes a rebuff to European ambitions to stall on the process until some kind of role for the United Nations is agreed.

It was reported yesterday that the National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice has also ruled out any key role for the UN.

The decision to proceed with an embryonic government comes in response to memoranda written by Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld last week, urging that the US begin to entrench its authority in areas under its control before the war is over.

Pentagon officials told The Observer that the administration is determined to impose the Rumsfeld plan and sees no use for a UN role, describing the international body as 'irrelevant'.

The proposal is due to be discussed by George Bush and his closest security officials when he returns from this week's Northern Ireland war council with Tony Blair.

But according to US offi cials in Doha, elements of an embryonic new government will be established in the southern port of Umm Qasr, taken by coalition forces during the first days of the war.

It will be installed by the Pentagon's Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance, under the former US army Lieutenant General Jay Garner, and answerable to the Pentagon.

'What we are going to start trying to do, even before the fighting is over in Iraq, is to move to the areas in Iraq that are relatively peaceful, places like Umm Qasr, and to start moving [the office of reconstruction] into Iraq,' the official said. 'It is a fair assessment to say that this is the first step to set up a civil administration in Iraq.'

The decision is a rebuff to European diplomats who pleaded with US Secretary of State Colin Powell on Thursday to allow for a UN role.

By brushing the UN aside at such an early stage, the move also places Tony Blair - whose own preference is for a UN role - in a difficult situation ahead of his meeting with Bush this week.

Rumsfeld presented two memoranda to the White House last week, urging the President to begin setting up government institutions in areas under US control. He said the new organs could install Iraqis returning from exile under the tutelage of American civilians answerable to General Garner.

But his plan has been opposed even within the administration. Colin Powell is known to favour a military government established after victory is assured, prepared to nurture an Iraqi government centred around citizens resident in Iraq, rather than exiles sponsored by neo-conservatives in the Pentagon.

General Garner is already set to make his media debut in Kuwait tomorrow as the man whom the US has named to be Iraq's temporary post-war civilian administrator.

The US viceroy of the Southern region will be retired General Buck Walters; one of three governors slated to minister the new Iraqi provinces.

The others are General Bruce Moore in the largely Kurdish north and former U.S. Ambassador to Yemen Barbara Bodine based in Baghdad, governing the central region.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: br; breakingnews; bushdoctrineunfold; fif; iraqgovernmentun; iraqifreedom; postwariraq; warlist
Glad to see this moving along faster than obstructionist nations (and people) can respond.
1 posted on 04/06/2003 1:32:13 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: elfman2
No, no, no! I just heard a liberal radio show last night that said the US has not even thought about what to do after the military conflict ends. This can't be! It's going to be a disaster!
2 posted on 04/06/2003 1:41:08 PM PDT by EvilOverlord (Body armor goes well with ANY outfit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
I think Blair's "unhappiness" is for his domestic consumption. I think he knew this is how things would go when they couldn't get a 2nd resolution. No big deal, but I wouldn't be surprised to see public handwringing for his constituents' benefit.
3 posted on 04/06/2003 1:41:31 PM PDT by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
"Pentagon officials told The Observer that the administration is determined to impose the Rumsfeld plan and sees no use for a UN role, describing the international body as 'irrelevant'."

Happy Day!
4 posted on 04/06/2003 1:43:10 PM PDT by Chirodoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
Blair is in a pickle, but IMHO it can't be helped.

The UN Security Council overplayed its hand, and we are not going to pull its chestnuts out of the fire any time soon. Certainly we don't need the UN to institute a government which is no better than what our blood and treasure has deposed

. . . and Russia and France have some explaining to do before they presume to question us.


5 posted on 04/06/2003 1:43:50 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; snopercod; ..
Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



6 posted on 04/06/2003 3:13:46 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hipixs
ping!

This has the link to the article!
7 posted on 04/06/2003 3:14:48 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks
8 posted on 04/06/2003 3:35:02 PM PDT by Hipixs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chirodoc
It was reported yesterday that the National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice has also ruled out any key role for the UN.

Looks like we're pretty much all on the same page that the UN is irrelevant! : )

9 posted on 04/06/2003 3:41:51 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
Mmmmmm...puppet dictator. I give him 5 years, max.
10 posted on 04/06/2003 4:55:18 PM PDT by Indrid Cold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson