Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dixie Chicks Under Siege (coalition of ex-fans thirty miles out, “Chicks will win!” - Fisk)
NY Post Page Six ^ | 4/2/03

Posted on 04/02/2003 12:38:40 PM PST by dead

DIXIE CHICKS UNDER SIEGE


PHOTO

The Dixie Chicks
- Photo by: AP


THE Dixie Chicks say they're in danger of bodily harm from folks who are taking their anti-Bush statements a little too personally. The country trio - who got in hot water three weeks ago for telling a London concert audience they were "embarrassed" that George W. Bush is a fellow Texan - told Australian radio they've been receiving threats and some of their property had been vandalized. "We've gotten a lot of hate mail, a lot of threatening mail," Martie Maguire said Saturday after a gig in Sydney. "Emily [Robison] had the front gate of her ranch smashed in. We have to have security when we get back to the states. It puts my well-being in jeopardy." Even after seeing Dixie Chicks albums banned from radio playlists, Natalie Maines says she's still shocked at the amount of press her tantrum received, reports Sydney journo David J. Baird. "What is wrong with the world when what the Dixie Chicks say is more important than the war? Why does anyone care what we think?" The backlash has left Maguire with "a combination of emotions. Either I want to speak out more or I'm scared to say anything."

Continue Reading PageSix...
LIGHTWEIGHTS

If you'd prefer to see all of PageSix at once
(no photos included),click here.


 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ditzytwits; dixiechicks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

1 posted on 04/02/2003 12:38:40 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead
Welcome to the real world, Chicks.
2 posted on 04/02/2003 12:42:32 PM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
they've been receiving threats and some of their property had been vandalized. "We've gotten a lot of hate mail, a lot of threatening mail,"

They're from Texas and yet they had no clue as to what was gonna happen to them? How stupid is that?

So9

3 posted on 04/02/2003 12:43:38 PM PST by Servant of the Nine (JDAM the Arabs, Full Speed Ahead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
The first amendment is guaranteed......as are the results of its abuse....
4 posted on 04/02/2003 12:44:20 PM PST by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
I'd take their statements about "threats" with a grain....
5 posted on 04/02/2003 12:44:28 PM PST by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
"What is wrong with the world when what the Dixie Chicks say is more important than the war? Why does anyone care what we think?" The backlash has left Maguire with "a combination of emotions. Either I want to speak out more or I'm scared to say anything."

Talk about your classic Ditzy Chick blonde moment...Try shutting up for starters, Natalie.

6 posted on 04/02/2003 12:44:49 PM PST by TADSLOS (Sua Sponte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Natalie Maines says she's still shocked at the amount of press her tantrum received, reports Sydney journo David J. Baird. "What is wrong with the world when what the Dixie Chicks say is more important than the war? Why does anyone care what we think?"


I bet they werent referring to Michael Moore and Al Gore regarding this comment (those 2 have publicly supported them)

Its wrong for people to get violent about this. Still, the Blixie Chicks need to learn to quit running their mouths...the anti-Bush comment isnt their first case of mouth-overloading-ass
7 posted on 04/02/2003 12:45:16 PM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Stop Anti-American Bigotry......Ignore Hollywood And The Liberal Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Natalie Maines says she's still shocked at the amount of press her tantrum received

"...I mean, after all, we're celebrities. Everyone knows that we're not supposed to be criticized for anything!"

8 posted on 04/02/2003 12:45:17 PM PST by TheBigB (The noose is tightening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
"What is wrong with the world when what the Dixie Chicks say is more important than the war? Why does anyone care what we think?"

Then why'd you open your big mouth Natalie if no one cares?

9 posted on 04/02/2003 12:45:20 PM PST by smith288 (Visit my gallery http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/hollywood/hollywood.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
LOL...love the "headline"
10 posted on 04/02/2003 12:46:15 PM PST by amused (Republicans for Sharpton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Just give peace a chance, ladies, and turn the other cheek. That what you'd like the U.S. to do, right?
11 posted on 04/02/2003 12:47:05 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
People who yell "fire" in a crowded theater should expect to get trampled.

In this case people who make political statements should expect reactions from those with contrary opinions.

NOTE: They do not discuss fan objections, they are attempting to marginalize the disagreement by directing it to disagreeement by anti-maines people are vanadals and holigans. This is just spin control. Wheren't they supposed to be in the USA now?
12 posted on 04/02/2003 12:47:28 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead
What these are other bozo celebrities can't seem to figure out is that when you are apolitical, then everyone likes you for your work. The minute you open your mouth about politics, then you have instantly alienated half of your audience. At that point people then see your politics not your work.

The time to be political is when your career is on the wane.

13 posted on 04/02/2003 12:49:53 PM PST by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
Hammer...

Nail...

Head.
14 posted on 04/02/2003 12:50:22 PM PST by Frank_Discussion (Time is the fire in which we burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dead
These no-talents are getting a little of what they preach right back at them. Maybe your fans feel a bit betrayed, girls, sort of like that chick in the "Earl" video?
15 posted on 04/02/2003 12:50:29 PM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
"Why does anyone care what we think?"

Gotta admit...there's a question that resonates.

Love the Thread Title. ;^)
16 posted on 04/02/2003 12:51:34 PM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Natalie Maines says she's still shocked at the amount of press her tantrum received

Dear Ms. Mains

Please have someone read my tagline, and explain it to you in terms that even you can understand.

Disrespectfully yours
Hodar

17 posted on 04/02/2003 12:52:28 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Wheren't they supposed to be in the USA now?

No, I think their tour here starts 1 May.

A caveat; The reason I dont think W is going to go the way of his father after a successful war, is because of stories like this. People are really fed up with liberals and their foolish comments. Did you see Susan sarandon pouting because her fundraiser was cancelled? I believe the Blixies, Sarandons, streisands and Moores have guaranteed W's reelection..

18 posted on 04/02/2003 12:52:45 PM PST by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dead
chuck the fixie dicks
19 posted on 04/02/2003 12:53:27 PM PST by camle (no camle jokes, please...OK, maybe one little one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Can anyone cite a single example where a pro-war activist has harmed or physically assaulted a protester?
20 posted on 04/02/2003 12:54:37 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson