This is an example of domestic fascism, pure and simple. The mayor is out of control. This is an illegal taking. The owners need to be compenstation for the loss of the use of their aircraft. What's next?
1 posted on
04/01/2003 2:01:52 PM PST by
Writer1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Writer1
This is an example of domestic fascism, pure and simple. Correction: attacking and destroying transportation infrastructure in a midnight raid is an act of terrorism.
Osama bin Daley should be arrested and prosecuted for commiting an act of terror during time of war.
To: Writer1
I think if I had a plane stored here and they closed the airport like this, Chicago IS going to pay ALL costs to move the aircraft and restore it to airworthy condition.
But since I only fly rotor wings I don't need the runway!
3 posted on
04/01/2003 2:07:35 PM PST by
b fair
To: Writer1
First, you have violated one of the standards of this web site by changing the title of a posting. This is so that people can effectively search to prevent duplicate posts.
Second, the article itself never discussed the topic you used in the title, so the title is inaccurate.
Third, you have failed to establish your case. Daley II has already said that the City would pay the full costs of relocating those planes. Yes, he has inconvenienced those plane owners, but he seems as though he intends to find a way to compensate them for that. The "takings" clause only forbids the government to take private property if they don't compensate the owners for it. If it does, there's no violation. And it won't cost that much to compensate them for a few days inability to use those planes.
I'm not defending Daley II's actions, by the way. I'm just trying to defend the truth.
4 posted on
04/01/2003 2:07:54 PM PST by
RonF
To: Writer1
Even as critics prepared to sue the city to reopen Meigs, they conceded the city seems within its rights since it operates the airfield and it sits on Park District property. I don't know enough about local Chicago issues to know whether Daley is right or wrong, but I do know that closing down a city-owned airort does not violate the takings clause.
5 posted on
04/01/2003 2:08:04 PM PST by
merrin
(As falls that ass Saddam, so falls that damn Assad.)
To: Writer1
Neil Bortz slipped up and called Daley a b*astard on his show this morning--Bortz flew into there on occasion
6 posted on
04/01/2003 2:08:23 PM PST by
KansasCanadian
(Living the American Dream)
To: Writer1
It sounds like the owner is the city of Chicago.
7 posted on
04/01/2003 2:08:39 PM PST by
lasereye
To: Writer1
"The owners need to be compensated for the loss of the use of their aircraft."They need to be compensated for the LOSS of their aircraft ! How are the the private aircraft owners going to get them out of there with no runway to take off from ?
All hail King Daley !!
8 posted on
04/01/2003 2:09:02 PM PST by
SENTINEL
(Proud USMC Gulf War Grunt !)
To: Writer1
You read it here first. Richie Daley and his not-so-behind the scenes cronies want this land "for a park".....hah, hah....make that "for a lakefront CASINO"!
Leni
9 posted on
04/01/2003 2:09:27 PM PST by
MinuteGal
(THIS JUST IN ! Astonishing fare reduction for FReeps Ahoy Cruise! Check it out, pronto!)
To: Writer1
I think the mayor flew into the Sears Tower one too many times in Flight Simulator.
10 posted on
04/01/2003 2:09:52 PM PST by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, Zoolander)
To: Writer1
Considering that airports fall under Federal Jurisdiction, I'd say he has committed several Federal Crimes.
To: Writer1
Good will be a park to be enjoyed by all now. Great extension for biking, blading, jogging etc...maybe another Buckingham.
Beautiful!..dialog on this subject has been going on for years now ... way to long. Most want it as a park. Huraaaaah!
Plenty of small airports available in the western suburbs.
Plus we don't need any small planes targeting those civilians on the streets downtown rush-hour. It is a threat after 9/11.
Just my opinion. Sorry.
F_T_D
To: Writer1
Daley closed the airport because he lives just across Lake Shore Drive, in Burnham Park, and disliked the noise of the planes.
That's it.
If he puts a casino there, he's an even bigger schmuck.
16 posted on
04/01/2003 2:15:47 PM PST by
IncPen
(Fun? "F the UN")
To: Writer1
This airport belonged to the City thus, Daley had every right to do this. Takings have nothing to do with it.
It seems to have universally infuriated everyone, though. LoL. Even non-airheads.
To: Writer1
One of the Left's tactics: Always present a controversial proposal as a fait accompli. Let inertia do for you what conscience cannot. Or, in simpler terms, it's better to ask for forgiveness than permission.
25 posted on
04/01/2003 2:31:40 PM PST by
IronJack
To: Writer1
Illinois belongs in the same category with the Axis of Weasels.
26 posted on
04/01/2003 2:32:10 PM PST by
Sender
To: Writer1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Identify your STATE Senator/Representative.
Enter your zipcode.
May reqiure street address, ie. Split district issue
Next choice - Congress, State, Local. Select State and press GO.
* Click here for Senator/Representative *
http://www.capwiz.com/nra/dbq/officials
Write your editor or letter to your local newspaper.
Enter your zipcode.
* Click here for local newspapers *
http://www.capwiz.com/nra/dbq/media/.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
To: Writer1
Please explain how this was an "illegal taking".
Property in question belongs to the city (y/n)?
Run ways in question belong to the the city (y/n)?
Granted the owners of any aircraft stranded at the airport might have a claim for the fair market value of the aircraft or costs for relocating their aircraft.
Those who have rented facilities at the airfield could also be due compensation if the action violated any contractal terms.
But I still fail to see where there was a taking of anything.
To: Writer1
Drunk or sober, Mayor Daily is always a Democrat. What else can you expect from him?
33 posted on
04/01/2003 2:46:48 PM PST by
Zorrito
To: Writer1
A combative mayor said he was staving off possible terrorist attacks from the skies over the Loop, and that the quick action was necessary to avoid a protracted battle with Meigs supporters. Leftist thugs never let the voice of the people or democracy get in their way. Just imagine what methods this thug would justify using in a less free country to get his way. This is why leftists must be kept out of power.
To: Writer1
The apple didn't fall too far from the tree....
37 posted on
04/01/2003 2:57:41 PM PST by
mhking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson