Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Writer1
Please explain how this was an "illegal taking".

Property in question belongs to the city (y/n)?
Run ways in question belong to the the city (y/n)?

Granted the owners of any aircraft stranded at the airport might have a claim for the fair market value of the aircraft or costs for relocating their aircraft.

Those who have rented facilities at the airfield could also be due compensation if the action violated any contractal terms.


But I still fail to see where there was a taking of anything.
31 posted on 04/01/2003 2:42:28 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol
Aircraft owners paid for space to park their aircraft. There's been no word that they will be refunded their rental fees. That, at minimum, is a unjust taking.

Plus the aircraft owners are without use of their aircraft for a long period. That, also, is a unjust taking.
36 posted on 04/01/2003 2:49:40 PM PST by xdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol
Property in question belongs to the city (y/n)? Run ways in question belong to the the city (y/n)?

The city belongs to ...?

65 posted on 04/02/2003 6:54:14 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol
Please see fifth amendment takings clause and case law doctrine on constructive takings from SCOTUS, inter alia.
67 posted on 04/02/2003 9:43:58 AM PST by Writer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson