Skip to comments.
Iraqis Running Check Points were "Forced to do so"
FOX NEWS LIVE
| 4/1/03
| FOX NEWS CHANNEL
Posted on 04/01/2003 12:02:32 PM PST by stlnative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: redlipstick
The info was given by a Muslim cleric VERY interesting, I wonder if this piece of video will make it on Al Jizzera..
41
posted on
04/01/2003 12:16:04 PM PST
by
Paradox
To: Sender
If you bothered to check, you'd see I've been here for awhile. =)
I'm referring to Fox being the first to claim chemicals found on two occasions, and having to back away from it, making "blockbuster" annoucnements on Saddam's fate that turn out to be fizzles, etc.
It's OK to be conservative and still realize that Fox spins things too. Don't rush headlong to label your fellow Freepers when valid points are made that run contrary to how you believe, please.
42
posted on
04/01/2003 12:16:09 PM PST
by
Retrofire
(Let's roll!)
To: Aquinasfan
Words fail to describe the depth of this evil. Not for me!!! We just aren't allowed to use such language here...but y'all know what I' thinking.
43
posted on
04/01/2003 12:16:25 PM PST
by
Heff
To: brigette
So the second one was not armed with a bomb ---- it was meant to be shot at, by the US, for horror purposes? Those poor people. Damn those Saddam lackies to h**l!
44
posted on
04/01/2003 12:16:36 PM PST
by
Exit148
To: Retrofire
Fox was far too "out in front" on about three stories: 1) the British claim that they had "secured" Basra; 2) the repeated "discovery" of chemical weapons; and 3) the use of "scuds" before such was proven.
In the last few days, it looks to me like they have tightened up on what they let out, confirming multiple times. But still, how many different sources said the British had "secured" Basra?
One thing you cannot deny about FOX: it covers the WAR, while all these other stupid channels cover peace marches, idiot diplomats, and whining ex-military types. Fox keeps the main thing the main thing, and I love 'em for it.
45
posted on
04/01/2003 12:18:36 PM PST
by
LS
To: brigette
Since the original story broke my impression was that the Iraqi army had given the vanload an ultimatum. "Start driving, don't stop and if you do, we'll kill you and those you leave behind."
46
posted on
04/01/2003 12:19:20 PM PST
by
Hatteras
(The Thundering Herd Of Turtles ROCK!)
To: RAT Patrol
Probably according to the survivors in the van.Why would "survivors" be willing to tell the truth when their families would still be under threat of death? Doesn't pass the smell test.
To: brigette
Hi Brigette,
This is certainly one scenario that makes sense. A van full of women and children driving around unescorted in a war zone? That just doesn't add up. And then, not to stop?
48
posted on
04/01/2003 12:19:48 PM PST
by
TheDon
(It takes two to make peace, but only one to make war.)
To: Redcloak
The idiot reporters (my students are even calling them "idiotreporters," now, as if it's all one word!) asked Gen. Brooks if they would consider using "non-lethal" weapons like stun guns at check points. Can these people get any dumber?
49
posted on
04/01/2003 12:19:56 PM PST
by
LS
To: Exit148
Yes... they knew we would shoot at the car and the people in it, it may have been a test to see how they reacted. Next one may have a bomb in the engine area (would it go off if it was shot?)
50
posted on
04/01/2003 12:20:02 PM PST
by
stlnative
(If it were not for the soldier there would not be no land of the free)
To: brigette
hmmmmmm......Posted by AmericanInTokyo to tiki On News/Activism 03/31/2003 5:07 PM EST #53 of 171 "This may have been a suicide stunt. You know, "death-by-officer" when people force LEOs to 'off' them? They may have been whipped by the Ba'athists into an Islamic frenzy, and told to speed into that zone, and that their martyrdom could then play out on pan-Arabic TV everywhere, to further demonize 'the infidel invaders' and further the cause. Allah be praised. I smell something contrived here."
51
posted on
04/01/2003 12:20:05 PM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(KIM JONG IL is having another bad underwear day.)
To: Retrofire
I think he read the date you signed on wrong. For a fleeting moment I thought you were a newbie too. Your date says 2003-01-04. :-)
52
posted on
04/01/2003 12:20:31 PM PST
by
areafiftyone
(God Bless George Bush and Tony Blair!)
To: brigette
I would also like to hear from the survivors but this is an interesting interview.
But I must keep in mind that war is hell and whether they ran it on purpose (as suggested here) or not, it is a fact of war.
Of course, if this turns out to be true, then the lamestream press will run this part of the story in the "f" section, page 275, bottom right corner in a font size of 3.5 and not mention it on their nightly news casts.
hawk
53
posted on
04/01/2003 12:20:46 PM PST
by
hawkaw
To: LS
weapons like stun guns at check pointsHow bout we just give out demerits...
54
posted on
04/01/2003 12:20:47 PM PST
by
Paradox
To: Paradox
VERY interesting, I wonder if this piece of video will make it on Al Jizzera.. Of course not - but I hope it gets on Coalition TV transmissions.
To: Paradox
I'm guessing there are people who knew the man in the first van, and people who knew the women and children, and also knew if they were forced to run the checkpoints.
56
posted on
04/01/2003 12:21:49 PM PST
by
TheDon
(It takes two to make peace, but only one to make war.)
To: Redcloak
There was a bomb?
To: Sender
It can be spelled both ways but ii is the correct/preferred spelling.
58
posted on
04/01/2003 12:22:07 PM PST
by
KeyWest
To: CindyDawg
I was talking about the incident over the weekend; the one that killed 4 of our guys.
59
posted on
04/01/2003 12:23:01 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: Retrofire
Whether you are a troll or not, I thought your shot at Faux was quite witty. While I love them and spend most of my time with them (why waste effort on networks that don't even recognize the country from which they broadcast), they occasionally border on Weekly World News-ish hype.
60
posted on
04/01/2003 12:23:34 PM PST
by
Myrnick
(eee, I wuz awl 'ungry like)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson