To: M. Thatcher
Thanks for you comments on this. My thoughs are fully formed on this thansk to you and others and I realize that many might not agree with my conclusion. I believe that his acceptance of the interview (regardless of what he said or did) was aiding and abetting and therefore they are actions of treason so long as the intent part is present.
On that issue I don't know if he intended harm or was just plain gullible, stupid and reckless.
436 posted on
04/02/2003 8:47:07 AM PST by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
On that issue I don't know if he intended harm or was just plain gullible, stupid and reckless.And for any viewer who likes to be able to trust what reporters say, it probably doesn't matter which of your descriptions actually fits him the best. Any of them hinder his objectivity.
Like the little boy who cried wolf, his words won't be trusted.
438 posted on
04/03/2003 4:43:16 AM PST by
syriacus
(Arnett had the word SUCKER pasted on his big forehead ... and the Iraqis knew how to use him.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson