Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
On that issue I don't know if he intended harm or was just plain gullible, stupid and reckless.

And for any viewer who likes to be able to trust what reporters say, it probably doesn't matter which of your descriptions actually fits him the best. Any of them hinder his objectivity.

Like the little boy who cried wolf, his words won't be trusted.

438 posted on 04/03/2003 4:43:16 AM PST by syriacus (Arnett had the word SUCKER pasted on his big forehead ... and the Iraqis knew how to use him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]


To: syriacus
And for any viewer who likes to be able to trust what reporters say, it probably doesn't matter which of your descriptions actually fits him the best

That's a given. The question of intent was to establish whether he committed treason. As for most crimes, without intent there is no crime.

439 posted on 04/03/2003 5:54:22 AM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson