WooooooooooHooooooooooo!!!!!!!
.
Posted on 03/29/2003 10:29:54 PM PST by Pokey78
Patriotic Fox gloats over a CNN some viewers call too liberal
New York -- The newsroom at Fox News Channel used to be a Sam Goody and still has that generic retail look -- only crammed full of people, files and computers.
Executives work out of small offices with old furniture. Carpeting in the studios is frayed. Compared with its competitors, the network has less space, fewer international correspondents and a shorter journalistic tradition. But as the nation continues to wage war against Iraq, the unabashedly patriotic network has more viewers.
Critics snicker at the red-, white- and blue-festooned screen and say the network of Bill O'Reilly offers opinion, not news. But it has struck a chord with American viewers. A clear cable news ratings winner going into the war, Fox has held on to its No. 1 status, even during a serious international news event -- turf that Atlanta-based CNN long commanded.
"They announced for two months they were going to clean our clocks," Fox News chief executive Roger Ailes said of CNN executives. "My dad always taught me that if someone is bragging about beating you up, stay quiet until the fighting starts. The only thing that matters once the fighting starts is who wins."
'Absent of liberal bias'
Fox may be winning the ratings race, but its patriotic tone goads some detractors.
"It lacks skepticism," said Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism.
But viewers like 31-year-old North Georgia attorney Jenny Yates like it. "It is refreshing to hear news reports that are absent the liberal bias that is present in the reports on the other major news broadcasts," Yates said.
Alex Cobble, a 50-year-old commercial real estate broker from east Cobb, said he preferred Fox because most media have a "liberal, elitist bent."
Since its launch in 1996, Fox has steadily gained viewership. In January of last year, Fox for the first time beat CNN in both prime time and daylong ratings figures.
Still, there was speculation that CNN would win the ratings as the war started because of its vast international news operation and its hard news reputation. CNN pulled way ahead during other big events, including Sept. 11. It also reclaimed its lead briefly after the Columbia shuttle disaster. Also, CNN had a track record in the gulf region, having made its name there in 1991.
MSNBC, a distant third in ratings, also has extensive resources due to its relationship with NBC.
Despite apparent disadvantages, Fox attracted more viewers the night the United States first attacked Baghdad -- a lead it has held on to throughout the conflict.
Fox attracted an average of 3.6 million viewers from the night the war started through Thursday. By contrast, CNN attracted 3.2 million viewers and MSNBC drew 1.6 million. All are up dramatically from this time last year, though MSNBC and CNN have had bigger percentage increases than Fox.
No shouting at CNN
Ratings aside, CNN lead anchor Aaron Brown said CNN's coverage would be viewed as historic because it has been broad and shown all sides of the story, including negative sentiments about the war from other parts of the world.
"We don't have to dress it up," he said. "We don't have to scream and shout."
But at Fox headquarters, executives are gloating about ratings. They are proud, they say, to have won the contest with fewer resources. Fox, for instance, says it has 100 staffers in the gulf region, while CNN claims more than 200.
"Do we have 50 Humvees in the field? No. Maybe you don't need 50 Humvees in the field," said Bill Shine, network executive producer. "Maybe you need good journalists on the air."
Sharri Berg, who heads news operations, said reporters in the Middle East have spotted large convoys from other media outlets but were not awed. "They will say, 'There are three of us.' There is a certain pride in that," Berg said.
Strolling through the newsroom, she proudly points out a mere four people at that moment working on the international desk.
Anchors for the network's morning show "Fox and Friends" also seem to revel in their no-frills digs, contrasting theirs to CNN's slick studio down the street.
"We have four fuzzy chairs," said Steve Doocy.
"Not only that, we have a fly problem" added Brian Kilmeade. "When we aren't on camera, we are swatting down flies."
Though often criticized as buzzing with conservative bias, Fox executives say they are including both conservative and liberal voices, instead of just the liberal ones that most networks present.
Fox has not "inserted conservative dogma and called it news," said John Moody, senior vice president for news editorial. "What we've done is open the spectrum of opinion or point of view."
'Absolutely patriotic'
E.D. Hill, another "Fox and Friends" host, said Fox stands out because anchors can show emotion and be themselves on air. Hill, who wears an American flag pin and a pin representing the 3rd Infantry on her lapel, said she is "absolutely patriotic."
A Fox commercial supports the troops: "For your courage, for your sacrifice, your bravery," reads the message on screen, "we salute you."
Craig Allen, coordinator of broadcast news at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University, said that kind of flag-waving plays well in Middle America. "There's nobody with a British accent, and they don't seem to be reporting other countries' perspectives."
Rosenstiel, the Project for Excellence in Journalism director, noted that more people watch CNN each day. However, because viewers tend to watch Fox longer, it gets higher viewership at any given time. That means people may be checking into CNN for quick news updates while watching Fox longer for "a kind of comfort, an affirmation."
Another key to Fox's success, Rosenstiel said, is its consistency. While CNN and MSNBC have had leadership changes, programming changes and strategy shifts, Fox has stuck with its format.
By contrast, last week CNN canceled "Connie Chung Tonight" less than a year after its launch, part of a larger effort to return the network to its serious roots.
Fox staffers credit Ailes, who has run the network since its inception and who rules from a corner office, for holding to a steady course.
Ailes' deputy Moody says the biggest threat to Fox's continued success is complacency.
"It is actually harder being No. 1," he said, "than being No. 2."
I have to agree about MSNBC's Iraq coverage-very professional-with one exception, Keith Olbermann. This guy is so stupid I would almost prefer a toothache to listening to his dumb questions. For example, the night a missile landed in the Kuwait shopping center he asked the reporter on the scene if this would cause the Kuwait government to lessen their support for the war. The reporter delicately told the clueless Olbermann that since support for the war in Iraq was actually supported by a higher percentage of the Kuwait population then even in the US all the missile was likely to do is further piss off the Kuwaitis who already hate Saddam Hussein's guts. and by the way....isn't Keith Olbermann the same moron who once claimed that John Ashcroft reminded him of Heinrich Himmler?
Oh, get over yourself Mr. Rosenstiel. Fox rules!!
WooooooooooHooooooooooo!!!!!!!
.
Yeah, by liberals who react to bits of truth like the wicked witch of the west to water!!
Absolutely! Nothing like a little dose of reality to adjust one's perspective.
That was SO infuriating! Here is a thread about it.
They think that just reporting on the war instead of on Susan Sarandon's opinion of the war makes it balanced. They think that if they mention that there a few pro-America rallies that it balances their constant anti-war coverage.
Same here.
And doubtless, much like their biggest sponsors subscribers, the DNC, ACLU, Clinton cronies; Hollywood, etc., the way they think this little "problem" should be dealt with is likely by finding ways to silence or prevent access to balanced and honest news rather than by balancing their own coverage. I am reminded of a variation on a saying, "If we want you to have an opinion, we will give you one."
I'm on Time Warner cable and yes we have had Fox for about a year.
Just request it , over and over. Get friends to do so also. They can be turned.
ABC,NBC,CBS,CNN all have the same problem that the dems have.( why wouldn't they, all of them being dems). They think that their view is center, mainstream. Anything to the right of that is conservative. They just don't get it.
I refuse to watch Rather because of a specific event that happened just befor the Greneda 'invasion'.
Mr Rather critiqued a Ronald Reagan speech (unrelated to Greneda) before Reagan delivered it. That unfair (in my eyes)blast was the last time I watched Rather.
Bernard Shaw's refusal to be debriefed by the military when he got back from Baghdad during GW I swore me off CNN ( along with Peter Arnett).
I can't watch that fine patriotic Canadian Peter Jennings either.
The woman on GMA, can't think of her name, is so drippy she sounds like she is going to burst into tears at any moment. Drives me nuts!!
Give me Steve, E.D., Brian, Neil, Brit, Sean, and ,yes, I'm even warming up to Shep. O'Reilly, sometimes.
Plays well in a lot of other places, too, Mr. Allen...And just what is Middle America, anyway? A place? A state of mind? A figment of your imagination and biases perhaps...?
Why would you call FoxNews a grade C operation? I just don't get that impression. Now perhaps FoxNews doesn't have the "whiz-bang" graphics and the multi-million dollar sets of the rapidly fading CNN but that's not what I tune in for.
I haven't watched much television these past 20 years but FNC gives me something to watch. They probably have the best prime-time lineup I've ever seen. The Bill O'Reilly Show is great. So is Hannity. And I've even warmed up to Greta Susteran. It's the best three hours in television. After those three hours, you are fully informed on the issues of the day. It's the next best thing to Free Republic!
My only beef with FoxNews is that they have too much repeated material and not enough fresh material (outside of prime time). But I see that as a short-term problem. Now that they are the top-rated cable news channel, I expect that the money will begin flowing into the FoxNews coffers and they will be able to offer round-the-clock original programming. Hell, the morning crew might even get new chairs!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.