Skip to comments.
IRAQI MISSILES 'MIS-FIRED' (defence commander sacked)
SKY ^
| Mar 30, 2003
| Staff
Posted on 03/29/2003 8:37:47 PM PST by Diddley
New intelligence suggests a series of Iraqi missiles have mis-fired and hit residential areas of Baghdad, Downing Street says.
The Prime Minister's spokesman said information had been received which indicated Iraq's air defence commander has been sacked due to the poor performance of missile systems in Baghdad.
He said: "A large number of surface-to-air missiles have been malfunctioning and many have failed to hit their targets and have fallen back onto Baghdad before exploding.
"Civil defence workers have been instructed to remove Iraqi missile fragments which fell on residential areas before journalists arrive on the scene." The spokesman stopped short of saying Iraq was responsible for the explosions that killed around 65 civilians in two Baghdad markets this week But he said the intelligence gave fresh reason for "scepticism" over Saddam's claims that the Coalition was to blame for the blasts.
"There is still no evidence that Coalition missiles were responsible for what happened on Wednesday (the first marketplace bombing) and we're still investigating what happened last night (the second marketplace bombing)," the spokesman said.
He added that the utmost care was taken by Coalition forces to target only military installations and Saddam's command and control facilities, in order to keep civilian casualties to a minimum. There was no question of either market being a target, he said. Earlier this week senior US commander Brigadier General Vince Brooks said he was "certain" that missiles fired from American warplanes at the time of the first market blast had hit their intended targets.
Tony Blair was given an intelligence briefing on Saturday morning on the sacking of Saddam's cousin Musahim Saab al-Tikriti as commander of Iraq's air defence force.
He was replaced by General Shahin Yasin Muhammad al-Tikriti, said Mr Blair's spokesman, who refused to divulge how the information had emerged.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: altikriti; civiliancasualties; errantmissiles; iraqifreedom; iraqimissiles; marketplace; misfired; missiles; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Indicates that missile(s) on Baghdad were Iraqi.
1
posted on
03/29/2003 8:37:48 PM PST
by
Diddley
To: Diddley
Indicates that missile(s) on Baghdad were Iraqi.
Should be: Indicates that missile(s) on Baghdad civilians were Iraqi
2
posted on
03/29/2003 8:38:56 PM PST
by
Diddley
(Those who have the fact present them; those who don't, rail.)
To: Diddley
I suppose being replaced in Saddam's circle, means dead as a doornail, now.
3
posted on
03/29/2003 8:42:41 PM PST
by
Conservababe
(I calls it like I sees it.)
To: Conservababe
I suppose being replaced in Saddam's circle, means dead as a doornail, now. Works for me.
4
posted on
03/29/2003 8:44:19 PM PST
by
Diddley
(Those who have the fact present them; those who don't, rail.)
To: Conservababe
I was just thinking, bet he doesn't collect unemployment!
To: Conservababe
I suppose being replaced in Saddam's circle, means dead as a doornail, now.One less that our special forces will have to track down and shoot. Thanks Saddam.
6
posted on
03/29/2003 8:46:50 PM PST
by
Jen
(Support our Troops * Stand up to Terrorists * Liberate Iraq)
To: Diddley
No, they didn't misfire. They worked as designed. The question on the table is whether or not the batteries fired them deliberately and under orders.
7
posted on
03/29/2003 8:49:23 PM PST
by
RichInOC
(Peter Marshall: "Paul, why do bikers wear leather?" Paul Lynde: "Chiffon wrinkles too easily.")
To: Conservababe
I suppose being replaced in Saddam's circle, means dead as a doornail, now. Correct!
................Re-Placed!................,".....to the floor!"
8
posted on
03/29/2003 8:49:29 PM PST
by
maestro
To: Conservababe
I suppose being replaced in Saddam's circle, means dead as a doornail, now. Probably not in this case. The guy is Saddam's cousin, and it would hardly improve regard of him amongst the other cousins (who run most operations of importance) if he offs one of them. He'll probably just be put out to pasture; maybe as one of those chair-fillers that hang out during Saddam's photo-op briefings. Of course, this will all be moot in fairly short order..
9
posted on
03/29/2003 8:53:42 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Diddley
The Prime Minister's spokesman said information had been received which indicated Iraq's air defence commander has been sacked due to the poor performance of missile systems in BaghdadFired, eh? Oh, yeah, I can just see it:
"I don't care if you are the boss's cousin! You've screwed up for the last time,al-Tikriti. You're fired! Yeah, you, ya bum! Now you got fifteen minutes to get your junk and get outta here! Mustaffa, bring him a cardbox and help him clean out his desk."
(Times passes)
Mrs al-Tikriti, humming while finishing up some last minute busy-work: "Honey? Is that you? You're home early. Is everything alright?"
Al-Tikriti, dragging in complete with hang dog expression:, "No...I got fired...."
10
posted on
03/29/2003 8:56:44 PM PST
by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it, but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: RichInOC
No, they didn't misfire. They worked as designed. The question on the table is whether or not the batteries fired them deliberately and under ordersI think you are correct, I don't beleive for one minute that he was sacked for the stated cause, probably more the process of finding who told where saddammn was on the first night.
To: Diddley; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; knak; MadIvan; ...
12
posted on
03/29/2003 9:17:36 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Nuke Saddam and his Baby Milk Factories!!)
To: AntiGuv
You have got to be kidding. Saddam killed two sons-in-laws who displeased him.
13
posted on
03/29/2003 9:19:07 PM PST
by
Conservababe
(I calls it like I sees it.)
To: Conservababe
You don't supposed he gets a gold watch do you? Maybe a lead urn to hold his naughty bits while they flail the rest of him and then move on to his family. Saddam's nothing if not predictable.
That or they send him to the Russian front!
14
posted on
03/29/2003 9:20:39 PM PST
by
Lx
(So it's now, Duct tape and cover?)
To: Conservababe
Yeah, but from their perspective, the two sons-in-laws were traitors who had defected from Iraq before getting lured back. Also, Saddam wasn't in his current relatively vulnerable state, where offing a high subordinate could create the very real possibility of a coup.
15
posted on
03/29/2003 9:20:45 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
You are kidding me, right? Saddam wondering if the world would care if he offed someone?
Sorry, but I a laughing so hard.
16
posted on
03/29/2003 9:23:30 PM PST
by
Conservababe
(I calls it like I sees it.)
To: Diddley
Probably got a silver bullet instead of a pink slip.
17
posted on
03/29/2003 9:28:10 PM PST
by
LaGrone
To: Conservababe
"Sacked" is probably to be taken literally here.
18
posted on
03/29/2003 9:37:24 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Conservababe
No, not the world, but his other cousins who run other parts of his current war effort. Think whatever you want; that's my opinion, though.
19
posted on
03/29/2003 9:56:25 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Diddley
Saddam's cousin Musahim Saab al-Tikriti
"Scud Stud"?....Not!
20
posted on
03/29/2003 9:58:56 PM PST
by
ErnBatavia
((bumperootus!))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson