To: CometBaby
If that turns out to be the case liberals will replace AIDS with SARS as the next politically correct disease to expend government funds upon.
To: goldstategop
Unlikely as SARS doesn't target politically protected groups like homosexuals.
To: goldstategop
This is not a politically correct disease and I would not reference it in that manner. It is not going to target a specific group of people. It is AIRBORN and that means it is highly contageous. There is no reason to think it is going to be limited to Hong Kong. It is going to affect EVERYONE.
To: goldstategop
"If that turns out to be the case liberals will replace AIDS with SARS as the next politically correct disease to expend government funds upon."
I think you are incorrect. This disease is not spread mostly by homosexual behavior!
14 posted on
03/29/2003 5:39:49 AM PST by
Dacus943
To: goldstategop
If that turns out to be the case liberals will replace AIDS with SARS as the next politically correct disease to expend government funds upon. And they'll find a way to blame Reagan for it.
39 posted on
03/29/2003 6:13:06 AM PST by
AAABEST
To: goldstategop
If that turns out to be the case liberals will replace AIDS with SARS as the next politically correct disease to expend government funds upon. Only if you had to engage in sexual promescuity or perversion to get it. If it's airborn, like a cold, well then the person deserved to get it.
53 posted on
03/29/2003 6:52:45 AM PST by
ethical
To: goldstategop
If that turns out to be the case liberals will replace AIDS with SARS as the next politically correct disease to expend government funds upon. If it continues to double its numbers daily, there won't be enough time to spend much in the way of government funds. How many cases do we have reported here in the U.S.?
MM
To: goldstategop
I Disagree. Anyone can catch SARS.
95 posted on
03/29/2003 9:15:33 AM PST by
plusone
To: goldstategop
It's sort of important for the government to spend money on national security... and a disease like SARS just might threaten our security, it certainly threatens other nations' health.
112 posted on
03/29/2003 4:55:20 PM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: goldstategop
Sorry dear, avoiding certain unacceptable behaviors will not protect you from this disease. All you have to do is be in a public place to contract it.
To: goldstategop
No, to be a politically correct disease, a favored group of the left must be the primary victims. This is a disease that kills members of all groups. It doesn't qualify.
If that turns out to be the case liberals will replace AIDS with SARS as the next politically correct disease to expend government funds upon.
119 posted on
03/29/2003 6:49:56 PM PST by
GOPJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson