Skip to comments.
Quick-thinking NCOs rescue soldiers from burning tank
Army Times ^
| March 28, 2003
| By Sean D. Naylor
Posted on 03/28/2003 4:41:20 PM PST by Bayou City
Edited on 05/07/2004 10:06:21 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
CENTRAL IRAQ
(Excerpt) Read more at armytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 7thcav; abramstanks; ambush; embeddedreport; gutsandglory; iraq; ncos; seandnaylor; tank
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Joe 6-pack
Thanks...sort of makes sense for the engine compartment, still wouldn't want to subject my driver to it though.
21
posted on
03/28/2003 5:04:22 PM PST
by
pipecorp
To: Bayou City
"Do you think it might have been one of those Russian anti-tank missiles?" AT missile or gun.
What gets me is that the tanks are with Bradleys for a reason. They are they to protect the tanks from nonsense like this. It was bad wheather I guess.
To: pipecorp
The tank also has thermal and light sensors through the turret which can discharge the bottles. One of the biggest dangers in the A1/2 is that basically the entire casing is combustible w/ the exception of a metallic base, or afcap. A defective or improperly stored round may leave unburnt propellent in the gun tube and when the afcap is extracted, the air rushing into the tube hits the proppelent and can create a turret flareback. Shortly after we adopted the A1, there was a crew on a gunnery range (Germany?) that was burned to death when a loader placed a round on the turret floor and a hot, ejected afcap made contact with the round. If the appropriate guards are in place, and the crew observes the proper procedures, it really is a lot safer than it sounds.
To: eabinga
check the link
here. colorado tanker said that the officers involved believe it might be a Russian supplied tow system called the Kornet E.
To: Bayou City
"Sgt. 1st. Class Javier Camacho, 35, of Bayamon, Puerto Rico"
Sgt., if you ever see this, I want to tell you, you are one helluva guy.
25
posted on
03/28/2003 5:20:49 PM PST
by
Bahbah
(Pray for our Troops)
To: vbmoneyspender
I thought I read somewhere it was a tow system, but it doesn't say that in colorado tanker's post.
To: eabinga
This article has further details
See Link
To: Bahbah
"Sgt. 1st. Class Javier Camacho, 35, of Bayamon, Puerto Rico"
Agreed. A strong *Salute* to Mr. Camacho.
28
posted on
03/28/2003 5:29:19 PM PST
by
ChadGore
(288,007,154 Americans did not protest the war today)
To: Bayou City
Medal of Honor? Could be..its above and beyond IMO.
29
posted on
03/28/2003 5:31:46 PM PST
by
crz
To: Joe 6-pack
It's my understanding that once existing stocks of Halon
are gone/used up, the military (and anyone/anything else using it) will have to find an alternate. More greenie-weenie nonsense, as it is a flourocarbon or whatever. For
aircraft at least, nothing else comes close in effectiveness at this time.
To: Freedom4US
It's my understanding that once existing stocks of Halon are gone/used up, the military (and anyone/anything else using it) will have to find an alternate. More greenie-weenie nonsense, as it is a flourocarbon or whatever. For aircraft at least, nothing else comes close in effectiveness at this time True statement. Even the ones on the flight line are being replaced or already have been. The Army has purchased portable foam stlye extinguishers that are quite effective on aircraft fires. I can't speak to what armored vehicles are using as a replacement.
31
posted on
03/28/2003 5:37:40 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Sua Sponte)
To: crz
Medal of Honor? Could be..its above and beyond IMO. Naw, probably a bronze star though.
To: Bayou City
We're supposed to believe that an RPG destroyed an M1A2 Abrams??? Not bloody likely. Either this story is a crock or someone has some facts skewed.
33
posted on
03/28/2003 5:39:46 PM PST
by
IronJack
To: ChadGore
Ditto that salute!
34
posted on
03/28/2003 5:41:23 PM PST
by
GEC
To: Joe 6-pack
Halon got taken off the market because of environmental concerns (firefighting byproducts were damaging to the ozone). The military was allowed to use its remaining stocks, but after that, had to switch to another firefighting agent. Those firefighting byproducts were the dangerous aspect of halon, not the halon itself. If you were fighting a fire in an open space, you'd be fine - there'd be plenty of space for the byproducts to disperse. But in an enclosed area (like a tank), the byproducts can be dangerous, even over just a few minutes.
Halon didn't disperse enough oxygen to be dangerous, unlike CO2 - I hated working with that stuff. Didn't use it for fighting fires - we used it to shrink bearing inner-races. Always got a headache after doing that, even in a huge hangar.
I liked halon - it worked on everything. We dumped five or six roll-around bottles into an F-15E to put out a JFS fire. It was a scramble, and it wasn't till afterwards that you looked around and realized that the racks were hanging with live MK-82s. But we got the fire out.
35
posted on
03/28/2003 5:42:01 PM PST
by
Tennessee_Bob
(Dieses sieht wie ein Job nach Nothosen aus!)
To: Bayou City
Ball turret gunners of WWII, and tank and sub crews have got to be the scariest assignments out there.
To: Joe 6-pack
I wonder what happend to the halon bottlesI think the EPA has banned Halon.
37
posted on
03/28/2003 5:54:00 PM PST
by
oyez
( The best war news can't be told right now.)
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: Bayou City
Sounds like a Silver Star to me. Bronze Star at the very least.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
39
posted on
03/28/2003 5:57:50 PM PST
by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: Tennessee_Bob
That is courage. The feyadeen treatment of their own is cowardice and treachery. They don't have the guts to face what is coming to them for what they've done. Because they are cowards, to die is preferable than to stand to face the consequences of their actions. And die they will.
40
posted on
03/28/2003 6:03:38 PM PST
by
Minty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson