Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress plans ANWR hearing in ANWR village (Kaktovik.. population 256)
Fairbanks News-Miner ^ | 3-27-2003 | SAM BISHOP News-Miner Washington Bureau

Posted on 03/27/2003 9:41:19 AM PST by Trailer Trash

Congress plans ANWR hearing in Kaktovik
By SAM BISHOP News-Miner Washington Bureau
Article Published: Thursday, March 27, 2003 - 3:06:27 AM AKST


WASHINGTON--Congress will hold a hearing next month on Arctic National Wildlife Refuge oil drilling issues in the closest place to the refuge with a roof and a microphone: the village of Kaktovik.

Rep. Richard Pombo, the chairman of the House Resources Committee, plans to hold the hearing on April 5.

The military will provide a jet to deliver members of Congress, according to Pombo's spokesman, Doug Heye.

The committee will consider two pieces of legislation: Alaska Rep. Don Young's bill to open the refuge coastal plain to oil drilling and Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey's bill to make the plain an official federal wilderness area.

Markey, after Pombo scheduled a hearing on Young's drilling bill in Washington earlier this month, challenged the chairman to also hold a hearing on the wilderness proposal.

 

 

 

Pombo responded by saying he would do so--in Kaktovik. The village sits on Barter Island, just north of the refuge. Kaktovik leaders have supported drilling in recent testimony to Congress.

Markey wrote Pombo back March 20, asking that the hearing in Kaktovik be held before the committee takes any action on the oil drilling bill. Holding a hearing on a wilderness proposal after the committee had already approved drilling would serve no purpose, Markey observed.

Heye, Pombo's spokesman, said the chairman hadn't decided whether to schedule action on the drilling bill prior to the April 5 hearing. Even if the committee passes the drilling bill prior to the hearing, the information generated would still be useful for the debate before the full House, Heye said.

Markey, in his March 20 letter, also challenged the wisdom of using a military aircraft.

"I do not feel it would be appropriate to ask the military to divert its attention from the war to make it possible to take testimony on an issue which has already been decided by the committee," Markey wrote.

Heye said the committee had cleared such questions with the military beforehand.

"These are not the kind of planes that would be used in a military theater like Iraq," Heye said. "We asked the military at the very beginning 'Will this be an issue should anything occur?' and we were told point blank 'No.'"

Markey's spokesman, Israel Klein, said that wasn't the point.

"It's not a question of the equipment being used," he said. "It's a question of expending any kind of military resource on something that is not a national security priority in a time of war."

Klein said Markey hasn't been given any official notification of the hearing and so couldn't commit to attending.

"I would think that he would want to attend a hearing on his own bill," Heye said.

Washington, D.C., reporter Sam Bishop can be reached at sbishop@newsminer.com or (202) 662-8721.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bugs; edmarkey; energy; ice; tundra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Dear Rep. Markey

Don't forget the bug dope...

Kaktovik, Alaska

Could be good TV.

Will the CSPAN crew follow?

1 posted on 03/27/2003 9:41:20 AM PST by Trailer Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
North Slope Mayor Responds to "Nostalgic Haze" surrounding ANWR Development

This was in Oct of 2000.
2 posted on 03/27/2003 9:44:54 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
The committee will consider two pieces of legislation: Alaska Rep. Don Young's bill to open the refuge coastal plain to oil drilling and Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey's bill to make the plain an official federal wilderness area.

If I were the Speaker of the House, I'd have one rule in place when it comes to these stupid bills. Any member of Congress who sponsors a bill to restrict development in an area outside their home district would first have to travel on foot from their district to the area in question. Until that happens, the bill doesn't get put on the floor.

3 posted on 03/27/2003 9:49:27 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Good idea, just think of all of the representatives getting lost in middle America, the heartland that most of them fly over, but never visit... the vast open plains!
4 posted on 03/27/2003 9:52:43 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Actually Markeys bill would undo the promises made to the Native People's of Alaska when it was voted into the union. They were promised ownership of their respective areas. Now it looks like armchair *white* boys with no connection to these peoples who have lived there for thousands of years are going to lie to the Indians in this country AGAIN. Yet another broken treaty/promise with the Natives.
5 posted on 03/27/2003 9:54:07 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Well.. perhaps the haze will burn off next month.

The comment about using Military aircraft is a joke.

One quick phone call and a daily civilian charter seat would be made available.

The Village of Kaktovik wrote a letter to Daschle a couple of years ago asking him and others to come see ANWR and their village.

They did not answer.

Sen. Murkowski, a leading proponent of developing the ANWR field, is now the Governor of Alaska. I'm sure he would help facilitate transportation also.

Today, nothing stands in the way except the truth.
6 posted on 03/27/2003 9:58:30 AM PST by Trailer Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
They were promised ownership of their respective areas

They got that decades ago in ANCSA. Ignore it if you want, but the Native claims are settled. The issue is over, even if a few malcontents continue to demand all of Alaska while they are sitting waiting for a fish to bite.

7 posted on 03/27/2003 10:00:04 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I don't think the north slope Inupiak are trying to claim all of Alaska. I wouldn't like it if Congress declared my ancestral areas 'federal wilderness areas' and locked me out.
8 posted on 03/27/2003 10:03:42 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Oh, please, no one lives in the area to be drilled. No one would want to live in the area to be drilled. It is a desolate bug ridden area that is nearly uninhabitable. I am sure that the natives in the area would be more than happy to trade permission to drill for money.
9 posted on 03/27/2003 10:03:49 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eva
*Exactly* my point. Read the link I posted. The natives DO want the area to be drilled. It's 'environmentally sensitive' white boys thousands of miles away that don't want it drilled.
10 posted on 03/27/2003 10:05:17 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Google for George, the mayor of the north slope. He's a character. If he says drilling would be OK for the environment there, I believe him...
11 posted on 03/27/2003 10:07:47 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I guess I read your post too quickly.
12 posted on 03/27/2003 10:09:59 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I wouldn't like it if Congress declared

Most people don't like anything that comes out of Congress. The village should get in line to file their complaint. Either that or declare independence and go to war like the little kingdom in "The Mouse That Roared." Continual whining is unseemly and beneath the village; leave that for the French.

13 posted on 03/27/2003 10:10:08 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I take it you're unfamiliar with the Trail of Tears or maybe you think the Cherokee deserved it or something because the 'majority' though it was beneficial? The feds have used varied and sundry 'excuses' to deny the natives of this country their rights for 200 years. This is just another brick in that wall...
14 posted on 03/27/2003 10:11:52 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Who owns the land they live on? The Natives or the 'majority' that lives in the lower 48 and could care less about the well being of the 'natives'?
15 posted on 03/27/2003 10:13:35 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I take it you're unfamiliar

You're right, I don't know much about the plight of the lower 48, except Cherokee lost the war. Alaska is my backyard.

16 posted on 03/27/2003 11:33:28 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The Cherokee called treaties with the Great White Father in DC 'Talking Leaves'...

The name "Talking Leaves" was satirical of whites. The Cherokee felt that white man's words dried up and blew away like leaves when the words no longer suited the whites.

When the native claims on the whole state of Alaska were resolved in the 1970's the natives gave UP claim to the whole state in return for 'sovereignty' over specific lands. Reservations if you will. Now, even that sovereignty, which they were promised, is being denied them. What next? ...Talking Leaves...
17 posted on 03/27/2003 1:03:13 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Talking Leaves bump.
18 posted on 03/27/2003 1:03:35 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Reservations if you will.

There are no reservations in Alaska. The closest thing to being a reservation is Venetie.

19 posted on 03/27/2003 1:06:16 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I am waxing Nostolgic here - Haven't thought of Venetie in years. They use to meet small aircraft at the strip with rifles and shotguns screening the booze into the village. "Why you want to come our village?" It is really out in the middle of nowhere.

I welcome having the hearing at Kaktovik (Barter Island). Let those do-gooders get an earful from those who really owned the land before it was stolen from them by congress.

20 posted on 03/27/2003 1:21:08 PM PST by Dustoff45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson