Posted on 03/27/2003 2:50:53 AM PST by Mr. Mulliner
A BBC reporter covering the war from coalition headquarters in Qatar, denounced his network's coverage as "one-sided" and distorted. In his memo to his bosses, which was obtained by London's The Sun newspaper, BBC correspondent Paul Adams asked: "Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving 'small victories at a very high price?'" In fact, he contended, "the truth is exactly the opposite" since "the gains are huge and the costs still relatively low."A BBC reporter, covering the war from coalition headquarters in Qatar, denounced his network's coverage as "one- sided" and distorted. In his memo to his bosses, which was obtained by London's The Sun newspaper, BBC correspondent Paul Adams asked: "Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving 'small victories at a very high price?'" In fact, he contended, "the truth is exactly the opposite" since "the gains are huge and the costs still relatively low."FNC's Brit Hume on Wednesday night highlighted the Sun's story about Adams' scolding of the BBC, a story to which the MRC's Liz Swasey first alerted me.
An excerpt from the March 26 Sun story by Trevor Kavanagh:
The BBC was last night sensationally condemned for "one-sided" war coverage -- by its own front line defence correspondent.The story is online at (scroll down the page): http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003140559,00.htmlPaul Adams attacks the Beeb for misreporting the Allied advance in a blistering memo leaked to The Sun....
On Monday, he wrote from US Central Command in Qatar: "I was gobsmacked to hear, in a set of headlines today, that the coalition was suffering 'significant casualties'.
"This is simply NOT TRUE. Nor is it true to say -- as the same intro stated -- that coalition forces are fighting 'guerrillas'.
"It may be guerrilla warfare, but they are not guerrillas."
Adams' memo was fired off to TV news head Roger Mosey, Radio news boss Stephen Mitchell and other Beeb chiefs.
It adds stunning weight to allegations that BBC coverage on all its networks is biased against the war.
In one blast, he storms: "Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving 'small victories at a very high price?'
"The truth is exactly the opposite.
"The gains are huge and the costs still relatively low. This is real warfare, however one-sided, and losses are to be expected."...
Now that is definitely the first time in 1,466 CyberAlerts that the word "gobsmacked" has appeared. Oxford defines the word as an informal British term for "utterly astonished."
I'll be gobsmacked if any U.S. network reporter ever has the guts to take on any war coverage bias at his or her own network.
In reality, the only way he would get killed in a war in Saudi Arabia during Haj, would be from an attack by Saddam retaliating against Saudi Arabia for cooperating with the United States.
I was watching coverage of an anti war protest in London the other day. They interveiwed this dim witted woman who said the British troops should be tried as war criminals. I wonder where she got that idea from? Could it be from all the negative anti-war-babies-in-bandages(constant barage of images of civilian casualities) reports she watched on the BBC? I hope the people will be outraged. This is not fair to the British troops. God Bless them. They are putting their lives on the line as much as our troops are. They deserve more respect than this.
I wonder how much better things would be going in the world if all the press made an attempt at fair and balanced real reporting, instead of serving as propaganda tools for socialist/communist governments and/or trying to enrage the people into supporting the political views of the network? I mean what if they would try things like, say, reporting the FACTS and the TRUTH? What an original idea.
AKA the anti-American Bolshevik Communists
Is your nick from the old Chuck Connors TV show, by any chance? That was my favorite show when I was 5 or 6 years old.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.