Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC Reporter "Gobsmacked" by BBC's Distorted War Reporting
Media Research Center ^ | March 27, 2003 | Brent Baker

Posted on 03/27/2003 2:50:53 AM PST by Mr. Mulliner

A BBC reporter covering the war from coalition headquarters in Qatar, denounced his network's coverage as "one-sided" and distorted. In his memo to his bosses, which was obtained by London's The Sun newspaper, BBC correspondent Paul Adams asked: "Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving 'small victories at a very high price?'" In fact, he contended, "the truth is exactly the opposite" since "the gains are huge and the costs still relatively low."
A BBC reporter, covering the war from coalition headquarters in Qatar, denounced his network's coverage as "one- sided" and distorted. In his memo to his bosses, which was obtained by London's The Sun newspaper, BBC correspondent Paul Adams asked: "Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving 'small victories at a very high price?'" In fact, he contended, "the truth is exactly the opposite" since "the gains are huge and the costs still relatively low."

FNC's Brit Hume on Wednesday night highlighted the Sun's story about Adams' scolding of the BBC, a story to which the MRC's Liz Swasey first alerted me.

An excerpt from the March 26 Sun story by Trevor Kavanagh:

The BBC was last night sensationally condemned for "one-sided" war coverage -- by its own front line defence correspondent.

Paul Adams attacks the Beeb for misreporting the Allied advance in a blistering memo leaked to The Sun....

On Monday, he wrote from US Central Command in Qatar: "I was gobsmacked to hear, in a set of headlines today, that the coalition was suffering 'significant casualties'.

"This is simply NOT TRUE. Nor is it true to say -- as the same intro stated -- that coalition forces are fighting 'guerrillas'.

"It may be guerrilla warfare, but they are not guerrillas."

Adams' memo was fired off to TV news head Roger Mosey, Radio news boss Stephen Mitchell and other Beeb chiefs.

It adds stunning weight to allegations that BBC coverage on all its networks is biased against the war.

In one blast, he storms: "Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving 'small victories at a very high price?'

"The truth is exactly the opposite.

"The gains are huge and the costs still relatively low. This is real warfare, however one-sided, and losses are to be expected."...

The story is online at (scroll down the page): http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003140559,00.html

Now that is definitely the first time in 1,466 CyberAlerts that the word "gobsmacked" has appeared. Oxford defines the word as an informal British term for "utterly astonished."

I'll be gobsmacked if any U.S. network reporter ever has the guts to take on any war coverage bias at his or her own network.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bbc; iraqifreedom; media; mediabias; warcorrespondents
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: fightinJAG
Pray tell, at what state is one in when one is "chuffed"?

More or less very pleased.

21 posted on 03/27/2003 4:32:19 AM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mulliner
Partly, as I really liked that show too. Mostly it is just a general reference to one of my hobbies.
22 posted on 03/27/2003 4:42:44 AM PST by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mulliner
I wish some of the reporters for CNN would do the same thing!

Unbelievable!
23 posted on 03/27/2003 6:21:10 AM PST by jacksonstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mulliner
The English have such a way with the English language.
24 posted on 03/27/2003 6:23:22 AM PST by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
I was listening to the BBC last night. God is it biased! When they report any position of the US or Brit government, they make smarmey remarks that "we have nothing to prove that except their word" and then they insinuate that it must not be true because the war is behind schedule, poorly planned, the Iraqi's hate us, etc.
25 posted on 03/27/2003 6:30:30 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jacksonstate
I wish some of the reporters for CNN would do the same thing!

They do, when they jump to Fox! (Cf. Greta Van Susteren.)

26 posted on 03/27/2003 6:36:18 AM PST by Timesink (If you use the word "embedded" in a conversation, you'd better be carrying an x-ray to show me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Highest Authority
I found BBCAmerica, broadcast on the DirecTV system, to be EXTREMELY biased against the war

During the late sixties and early seventies two out of every three graduate recruits to the Beeb had either been members of their university socialist or communist party societies. These people are now in charge at the Beeb. Their views may have changed somewhat since then but the days of Lord Reith and strict adherence to the facts went out the window long ago.

27 posted on 03/27/2003 6:36:53 AM PST by Timocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911
Who's Julia Caesar?
28 posted on 03/27/2003 6:37:18 AM PST by Timesink (If you use the word "embedded" in a conversation, you'd better be carrying an x-ray to show me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mulliner; goldstategop; fightinJAG; Highest Authority; Montfort; blanknoone; ...
It's certainly true that they possess the liberal bias typical of newscasters, but the BBC still has a ways to go in order to reach the vitriolic unpatriotism of ABC.

[...]

I got a lot of my 2000 election news from the BBC because we were living in Singapore. Several times a day I was on the verge of flinging our short-wave radio off our 12th story balcony because of their lies and distortions.

Honestly, the BBC, ABCNEWS, etc, are nothing. You don't know what open, bald-faced America-hate bias is until you listen to or watch the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. I suggest you all join one of our nightly CBC-bashing threads; C-SPAN is airing their nightly one-hour "premiere" newscast live at 9pm Eastern for the duration of the war. I promise you, your jaw will drop.

29 posted on 03/27/2003 6:41:55 AM PST by Timesink (If you use the word "embedded" in a conversation, you'd better be carrying an x-ray to show me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Honestly, the BBC, ABCNEWS, etc, are nothing. You don't know what open, bald-faced America-hate bias is until you listen to or watch the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

I happened to catch a little of that and felt it resembled poor white trash envy of people who have all their teeth.

30 posted on 03/27/2003 6:47:13 AM PST by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mulliner
The BBC has me really cheesed off!
31 posted on 03/27/2003 6:58:51 AM PST by Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mulliner; MadIvan
Gobsmacked. How thoroughly British. I love it.

Ivan, can you tell us more about this word? We would be very greatful for any gobsmacking info you have. ^-^
32 posted on 03/27/2003 7:16:41 AM PST by 4mycountry (Anyone can be average---it takes something special to be weird. I am honored to be weird.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Who's Julia Caesar?

A little blonde cutie who gives a BBC financial report for ABC in the morning....

33 posted on 03/27/2003 7:21:10 AM PST by bullseye1911 (Cocked, Locked and Ready to Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mulliner
Gobsmacked?
Gobsmacked!
Gobsmacked,Gobsmacked,Gobsmacked!
Gobsmaaaaaaaaaaaacked!!
Gobsmackied.
Gobbersmacked.
Gobsmacky-ness.
Everlasting Gobsmackers.
Gob done smacked.
Gobbysmacked.
Smacked the gob outta me.
Was so mad I smacked my gob.


Gobsmacked. My version. ***^-^***
34 posted on 03/27/2003 7:25:25 AM PST by 4mycountry (Anyone can be average---it takes something special to be weird. I am honored to be weird.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4mycountry
Ivan, can you tell us more about this word?

It's slightly more severe than being "hornswaggled".
35 posted on 03/27/2003 7:41:34 AM PST by yournamehere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911
Gob is a vulgar British expression for the mouth. Therefore to be "smacked" in the "mouth" is to be given a very startling piece of news.
36 posted on 03/27/2003 8:09:07 AM PST by Timocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson