To: mewzilla
The 400,000 children have died in the past 5 years. The anti-war crowd doesn't give a damn. They sure don't! Kids dying is quiet and no one knows about it but war is violent and loud and there is actual blood, so it's bad. Yes war is the worst thing there is but starving kids or people quietly tortured and raped, no problem!
1,769 posted on
03/27/2003 8:39:43 AM PST by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
To: biblewonk
Wait a minute: I'm going to defend the liberals out of one side of my mouth here (I'll get to the other side later)...
Yes, they do care that 400,000 kids have died. That is why
they want to "end the sanctions"!
Of course, now... they are also bragging about the effectiveness of the "containment" of Saadumb... of which a cornerstone IS the sanctions. Which way do they want it - the sanctions or the children? I want neither one... end the sanctions now, and save the children. It takes the US military to do both at the same time, not the UN.
1,849 posted on
03/27/2003 9:02:09 AM PST by
AFPhys
(((PRAYING for: President Bush & advisors, troops & families, Americans)))
To: biblewonk; mewzilla
"The 400,000 children have died in the past 5 years. The anti-war crowd doesn't give a damn.""They sure don't! Kids dying is quiet and no one knows about it but war is violent and loud and there is actual blood, so it's bad. Yes war is the worst thing there is but starving kids or people quietly tortured and raped, no problem!"
The anti-war people will tell you they are concerned about the children, but that they don't believe Bush and Blair are doing this for their future.
They don't believe Bush and Blair are doing this for any moral reason.
They believe it is "For The Oil" and all "The money big business will make in rebuilding Iraq."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson