Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fatal flaws in Saddam's gamble
The Daily Telegraph ^ | March 27, 2003 | Michael Smith

Posted on 03/26/2003 5:03:35 PM PST by MadIvan

Saddam Hussein's decision to send out armoured columns of the Republican Guard is an extremely high-risk strategy. He is relying heavily on the cover provided by the sandstorms to ensure that Apache attack helicopters and the 101st Airborne Division cannot join the fight.

But they should be the least of his problems. The conventional wisdom was that the Republican Guard had no choice but to remain dug in around Baghdad. If it broke out, it would be cut to pieces by the sheer weight of allied airpower.

Now that theory will be put to the test. Can the allied airpower take out the Iraqis on the ground, leaving American marines and infantry to mop up and move on to Baghdad?

One thing is for sure, the sandstorms should not stop the allied aircraft, with their smart bombs and precision-guide missiles, from attacking the Iraqi armoured columns.

The layer upon layer of aircraft overflying the battlefield are directed by sophisticated surveillance aircraft such as the Jstars and Awacs, which can see through weather.

They act as the field directors for the Central Command operations team back at the al-Sayliyah forward command centre in Qatar.

They are not the only airborne sensors to allow the allied commanders to see through the sandstorms. Unmanned aerial vehicles such as the Predator drone carry sophisticated infra-red imagery equipment.

The use of the Global Positioning Satellite system to direct bombs and missiles means that, as long as the intelligence puts the target in the right place, they can be sure of hitting their targets.

If all of that works, then the end result is likely to be similar to Saddam's attempt to wrench the initiative from the allies during the 1991 Gulf war when his forces crossed the Saudi border.

Of the three armoured columns he launched into the attack, only one made it, severely depleted. The other two were turned back by lightly-armed US marines and overwhelming coalition air power. The allies will be hoping that Saddam has again made a gamble doomed to fail.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blair; bush; gps; iraq; saddam; sandstorms; uk; us; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: lawnguy
I would also not be surprised if the Iraqi leadership is trying to re-create a Highway of Death type visual for the networks to show back

I wouldn't be surprised if it hasn't already occurred but who is going to report it
TV been turned off
21 posted on 03/26/2003 5:31:50 PM PST by uncbob ( building tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
What could be going on in Saddam's sick mind?

I'm not sure how feasible this is, but could there be a chance that, using intelligence our CIA guys have gathered about their communication systems, we could have issued bogus orders to some Iraqi commanders to do something stupid?

22 posted on 03/26/2003 5:33:48 PM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Brain dead?
23 posted on 03/26/2003 5:33:53 PM PST by Starstruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
If 60,000 or so, sending out a few thou might not indicate much about his strategy.

That's what I was thinking. He sends out some cannon fodder, telling them they're headed for victory, and the real plan is that he gets us to crater the road to Baghdad.

According to the stories I've seen, the B-52's dropped a 500-pounder every 500 meters on these sitting ducks. What could that road look like now? Is that a road we have to take to get to Baghdad?

The elite Grease Spots of Saddam score another victory.

24 posted on 03/26/2003 5:34:48 PM PST by Nick Danger (More rallys planned! www.freeper.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
move into Baghdad and our WMD evidence will sitting in the desert for HAMZAT to clean up next week.

Perhaps we can have Blixie Boy to come over and see what they actually look like. For future reference don't-cha-know. ;-)

25 posted on 03/26/2003 5:35:37 PM PST by AFreeBird (God Bless, God Speed and safe return of our troops, and may God's love be with the fallen and family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
He's dead, Jim.
26 posted on 03/26/2003 5:36:04 PM PST by MonroeDNA (An American Black Muslim traitor, acting on his religeous beliefs, tried to take out the top brass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America
I think Israel used that trick awhile back.
27 posted on 03/26/2003 5:36:04 PM PST by Camel Joe (Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Roads? We don't need no stinkin roads!
28 posted on 03/26/2003 5:38:36 PM PST by Camel Joe (Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America
What an evil scenario,,I like it, I like it. But if he has chems, will he get close enough to our guys to spread them on them. Which way is the wind going? and how close are these guys?
29 posted on 03/26/2003 5:38:59 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Hopped up on pain killers?
30 posted on 03/26/2003 5:48:23 PM PST by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
The 405 freeway on friday nite
31 posted on 03/26/2003 5:56:29 PM PST by al baby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
"Are they carrying chem and bio weaspons with them.

If we hit chem weapons they are carrying and they detonate on the Iraqis, they will claim that we sent them, and much of the world (led by the French and many in this country) will eagerly pretend this to be a credible claim and be calling for trials before the world court.

32 posted on 03/26/2003 5:58:25 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
My long-delayed thanks for all of your informative posts!
33 posted on 03/26/2003 5:58:37 PM PST by nvskibum (curious...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
the real plan is that he gets us to crater the road to Baghdad.

Not a cheerful thought.. Those roads do bear watching.

34 posted on 03/26/2003 6:17:03 PM PST by PoisedWoman (Fed up with the liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

Tonight we welcomew new show host TOM ATKINS! *GARY ALDRICH Former FBI agent, Author of Unlimited Access Gary will discuss his new book, and America's current political situation.
*PIERRE DE HAIL Former French Special Ops fighter, president of Risk Management International Pierre will offer exceptional insight in the Iraq war, and controversial opinions on France, Europe

Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep! HIFI broadband feed HERE! (when available)

Would you like to receive a note when RadioFR is on the air? Send an email to radiofreerepublic-subscribe@radioactive.kicks-ass.net!

Click HERE to chat in the RadioFR chat room! OPEN AND CHATTING NOW!

Miss a show?

Click HERE for RadioFR Archives!

35 posted on 03/26/2003 6:17:16 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Are they carrying chem and bio weaspons with them. If saddam's people are in baghdad they don't wanta set those things off close to them. Could they be sending them out for us????

I would imagine that the high winds would weaken any chem or bio weapons.

36 posted on 03/26/2003 6:34:17 PM PST by Colorado Doug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
But ... we didn't want them to go back to Baghdad. Why didn't we wait until they were all on the road and start taking them out from both ends ...??
37 posted on 03/26/2003 6:37:26 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawnguy
My thoughts exactly, regarding re-creating the Highway of Death. This could also be a diversion, while the Saddam is up to something else, or maybe they are trying to draw a lot of us up close for something "special."
38 posted on 03/26/2003 6:59:04 PM PST by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
bump
39 posted on 03/26/2003 7:20:09 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
My thoughts on this:

1) Saddam survived, but was seriously wounded, during the initial bombing.

2) Saddam has now recovered enough to issue orders.

Other than Saddam being dead, I can't think of a better thing for us than Saddam in charge of the military.

Imagine going up against Germany with Hitler in a coma and Rommel in charge. It would have been horrible. But, thank God in his Providence, it was Rommel in a coma and Hitler in charge and we won.

Saddam is a military idiot with no understanding that his personal willpower does not translate to battlefield success. So, when he wills reinforcements to the front, he doesn't understand what "Complete U.S. Air Domination" means for his troops.

Good for us!

40 posted on 03/26/2003 7:30:14 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson