Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan Dies
March 26, 2003

Posted on 03/26/2003 2:32:43 PM PST by Timesink

Breaking


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: danielmoynihan; inmemoriam; newyork; ny; nyc; obituary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-255 next last
To: RetiredArmy
He was struck down by an acute case of saddness caused by Bush's complete failure in reaching a diplomatic solution to Saddams megalomania. Daschle just said so.
121 posted on 03/26/2003 3:01:35 PM PST by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
P.S. Somebody email the clintons and tell them not to bring a jumbo-tron to his funeral service.

If you thought Wellstonapalooza was a great show, just wait for Moynapalooza!

They're already trying to land the Beastie Boys and Rage Against the Machine for the hymns.

122 posted on 03/26/2003 3:01:50 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JMack; All
Moynihan's rationale for not supporting impeachment of Clinton is here. The abridged version:

Thus the Framers clearly intended that a President should be removed only for offenses `against the United States.' It may also be concluded that the addition of the words `high Crimes and Misdemeanors' was intended to extend the impeachment power of Congress so as to reach `great and dangerous offences,' in Mason's phrase.

The question now before the Senate is whether the acts that form the basis for the Articles of Impeachment against President Clinton rise to the level of `high Crimes and Misdemeanors.' Which is to say, `great and dangerous offences' against the United States.

Over the course of 1998, as we proceeded through various revelations, thence to Impeachment and so on to this trial at the outset of 1999, I found myself asking whether the assorted charges, even if proven, would rise to the standard of `great and dangerous offences' against the United States.

More than one commentator observed that we were dealing with `low crimes.' Matters that can be tried in criminal courts after the President's term expires. ...

Senators, do not take the imprudent risk that removing William Jefferson Clinton for low crimes will not in the end jeopardize the Constitution itself. Censure him by all means. He will be gone in less than two years. But do not let his misdeeds put in jeopardy the Constitution we are sworn to uphold and defend.

123 posted on 03/26/2003 3:04:47 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: billbears
you at least had to respect how he stood up for what he believed.

I did, and actually voted for him once. And I respected him when I saw him on Meet the Press, when he said that if Clinton lied before a grand jury it would “certainly be an impeachable offense.”

Months later, I saw him conclude on television that it was beyond a doubt that Clinton had lied to the grand jury, but he would not vote to convict him.

It was then I realized that I had been had for the last time by a hypocritcal lying Democratic party hack.

Rest his soul though.

124 posted on 03/26/2003 3:05:00 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass
I read that he had a burst appendix last weekend,and he was okay for a day or so until serious infection set in that they could not control. He was my mother's all time favorite Senator,and I still get a chuckle thinking about his meanderings and prose on meet the depressed on Sundays. He always sounded like he had knocked down a few cocktails beforehand. He always had that twinkle in his eye when he would cajole a fellow Senator. I miss him already.
125 posted on 03/26/2003 3:05:30 PM PST by samantha (Don't panic, the adults are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Ditto. I think I'll have a 1/2 glass of "Jameson" in his memory. He was probaly the last of Patriotic Democrats.

Mustang sends.
126 posted on 03/26/2003 3:06:12 PM PST by Mustang (Evil Thrives When Good People Do Nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather
Lets see how the dems. handle this funeral.

I have to admit I was thinking the same thing.

127 posted on 03/26/2003 3:08:15 PM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Trying To Wish Reagan Away
128 posted on 03/26/2003 3:10:33 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Sad to hear that he finally succumbed to the life after. My thoughts & prayers are with him, his family & friends.
129 posted on 03/26/2003 3:11:52 PM PST by Teetop (democrats....... socialist.........whats the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Moynihan was a decent and honorable man, a true gentleman in an age in which they are few and far between. While I concurred with few of his positions, I am certain he took all of them after proper deliberation and because he truly believed they were in the best interest of the United States of America. May God bless his soul.
130 posted on 03/26/2003 3:12:34 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
If you like that one, you’ll love this one:

Moynihan, other Democrats seek Clinton's impeachment

131 posted on 03/26/2003 3:13:26 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
May he be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows he's dead.

My condolences to his family.
132 posted on 03/26/2003 3:15:19 PM PST by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
And whether or not you agreed with him, you at least had to respect how he stood up for what he believed.

Yeah right like when he warned about kids having babies at 14 etc etc and then proceeded to VOTE FOR every damn welfare and socialistic bill that came down the pike.
I saw him on Capitol gang and his comments on guns were completely irrational
133 posted on 03/26/2003 3:16:08 PM PST by uncbob ( building tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Extremist
I Potato(e) was...Chrissy was Tip's.
134 posted on 03/26/2003 3:16:30 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because your paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack
Moynahan wasn't bad for an old Democrat, except he's partly the reason Hillary is now a New York Senator. She took his seat.
135 posted on 03/26/2003 3:17:41 PM PST by arasina (PRAY for our troops, our president, our journalists, and the innocents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Make that Moynihan not Moynahan.
136 posted on 03/26/2003 3:18:16 PM PST by arasina (PRAY for our troops, our president, our journalists, and the innocents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #137 Removed by Moderator

To: Timesink
Know what I find very interesting? There is at least 10 times more eulogizing going on here than over on DU. The few over there who are commenting on him are keeping it positive and respectful, but there is just a strange lack of interest over there it seems. God speed, Senator.
138 posted on 03/26/2003 3:22:11 PM PST by jmc813 (Control for smilers can't be bought;The solar garlic starts to rot;Was it for this my life I sought?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
He was the BIGGEST ANTI GUN DESTROY 2ND AMMENDMENT A$$
in modern times. I hated that jerk with a passion.
139 posted on 03/26/2003 3:24:49 PM PST by squibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JMack
I wasn't making any case for or against Moynihan. People had mentioned his vote on impeachment; I thought it might be enlightening and useful to see why he said he voted the way he did. Personally, I disagree with his conclusion.
140 posted on 03/26/2003 3:25:43 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-255 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson