Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third Infantry Finds Chemical Weapons
CBN News ^ | March 26, 2003 | Paul Strand CBN News War Correspondent

Posted on 03/26/2003 12:45:20 PM PST by Freedomsfriend

"What I just heard from a highly placed source here is that they've discovered, they've captured chemical warheads, they're Russian, they have Russian writing all over them and they are chemical warheads."

CBN.com – The Third Infantry Division has captured evidence of chemical weapons as they are fighting Iraq’s Republican Guard just 60 miles south of Baghdad. The evidence has yet to be confirmed, but CBN News War Correspondent Paul Strand delivered this exclusive information by satellite phone early Wednesday. PAT ROBERTSON: We are going to our CBN News War Correspondent Paul Strand, embedded with the Army's Third Infantry Division. That's the spearhead of the attack against Baghdad. Paul, we understand you have some shocking news about chemical warheads. Tell us about it.

PAUL STRAND: Yes, Pat, I do. First of all, I hope you can hear me because I am out in that raging sandstorm and it’s hard to hear you. I hope you hear me okay. What I just heard from a highly placed source here is that they've discovered, they've captured chemical warheads, they're Russian, they have Russian writing all over them and they are chemical warheads. Of course, they can't get into them and find out if there’s chemicals because once they open them they'd all die right there on the spot. But they're gonna ship them off for testing.

They also captured a launcher that was able to shoot these very munitions that they've captured. And they’ve captured a man who mixes the chemicals, that was his job with the Medina Division which is the division we're facing right now near the city of Karbala. So all these things leading the military here to believe we might have been hit by chemical shells any time now, and we're not sure we've got them all. So those are the developments here near Karbala about 60 miles south of Baghdad.

ROBERTSON: Paul, I can hear you loud and clear, so don't worry about that. Let me ask you this, are these the type of weapons of mass destruction that has been talked about so much by President Bush?

STRAND: I’m not sure, Pat. I’ve told you just everything I heard. It happened just a few minutes ago. I would think this is definitely the smoking gun. It’s so strange, because the joke before this war was that Saddam says, "I have no chemical weapons, and if you invade I will use them on you." And now we find out they’re right out there with the frontline troops.

And another disturbing thing I heard a few days ago, was that he has pushed the level of authority for using these weapons down to the commander level. Not up around him, but the very commanders out on the line, they can use these things, they can choose to use them. So that means young officers have the orders now that they can go ahead and use these things if they feel like they are about to be overtaken. So that’s another disturbing development. Not only have we found the warheads, but officers out on the frontline can use them.

ROBERTSON: Paul, are you protected against this kind of thing? Will your suits do it and do you have some kind of an injection that can be used to counteract the effects of VX or whatever?

STRAND: Yes, Pat. We already, from the day we entered Iraq, we have had the suits on, the trousers and the pants, and boots, and gloves, and then we put the masks on. The mask fully protects us and the hood wraps around it tightly. And then we have in our backpacks, we have atropine we can shoot into our legs against nerve agents, we have pills to take against things like anthrax. So we’re pretty well covered. And the soldiers I have talked to seem very comfortable about getting hit with this stuff. The only thing is nobody wants to live in those masks for weeks.

ROBERTSON: Paul, I am told that the sandstorm may be the worst in recent memory, you know, in the last 17 or 18 years. Can you tell us about the sandstorm? Is it growing in intensity?

STRAND: It is about the worst weather I have ever felt in my life. Last night I was sleeping outdoors like usual, and it was so bad I jumped into a Humvee. There, with all of the windows closed and everything, the Humvee just filled with sand, there was so much sand it just came in through the little air holes or whatever. And the wind was so strong, it felt like the Humvee would get picked up and thrown over — and you know, Humvees are big, strong, giant vehicles. Stuff was flying through the air, smashing into the side of the vehicle all night long. And the air is completely yellow. You can't see any normal light, you can’t see the sky. It got dark like an hour before it was supposed to. It’s just truly an amazing sandstorm.

ROBERTSON: The Iraqis are saying it’s the judgment of Allah upon the attackers. Are we finding any bright spots in it for the American troops?

STRAND: We are. The soldiers have so much gear that can operate in this kind of thing that they say actually some obscuring factors like this can help them. Now the thing is, the battle has been raging in Karbala, back and forth, so both sides seem to be still operating in this environment. But I understand if it does go away here in the next day or two, that we will just really smash ahead as hard as we can. You know, I must admit, the first thing I said when the sandstorm came in, a lieutenant and I were sitting in the Humvee with it roaring all around us, and I said, "It’s at a moment like this that a theologian asks, ‘What is God trying to tell us?’"

ROBERTSON: [laughter] Paul, I think a lot of people are going to be asking that. This is kind of a trite statement, but as they say, stay safe.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blixiespixies; cbn; embeddedreport; illegalweapons; michaeldobbs; paulstrand; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-306 next last
To: Freedomsfriend
This may tie in with the news of a column of vehicles moving south from Baghdad. Could it be that this column is not coming out to fight with our troops -- but to try to get to a position that is UPWIND of them?
161 posted on 03/26/2003 1:31:13 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (Heavily armed, easily bored, and off my medication)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
The shells were marked "Poisinski gaski, for use against Amerikanski imperialists."

LOL Is decadant American disinformation.

162 posted on 03/26/2003 1:31:19 PM PST by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: patj
So, anyone heard any confirmation that Ivan has indeed been a bad, bad boy?
163 posted on 03/26/2003 1:32:19 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: wharfrat
is this still on the table?

We always have tactical nukes within reach in the field. Most likely aboard Navy ships.

Chemicals are not a problem for the troops, but bio would open a can of worms. Retaliation would be certain, but I do not know if they would use a nuke. Nobody expects to.

164 posted on 03/26/2003 1:32:58 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
..."Impossible. If Iraq has chemical weapons, why didn't the UN inspectors find them?"...

Because the REAL inspectors weren't allowed in. THEY are in there now.
165 posted on 03/26/2003 1:33:22 PM PST by NCC-1701 ((Good luck, happy hunting, and God-speed to the US military and our allies in this operation.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
Its refreshing to at least hear an upbeat positive development with positive coverage, I dont care who its from!

I heard Rush's montage of Leslie Stahls questions to Colin Powell and they were so negative it was sickening.
166 posted on 03/26/2003 1:33:43 PM PST by Chirodoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: swheats
I wonder if any FReepers actually realised that I was being sarcastic.
167 posted on 03/26/2003 1:33:46 PM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2
God may be trying to tell them: The Iraqis can't use chemical weapons in this weather, and I'm giving you a window of opportunity to get the job done before they can.

Several posters have brought this point up. Have to remember that God is looking out for our troops. I believe that God is on our side, he is also looking out for the Iraqi people too. I also believe that He will guide us to these weapons before they can be used against the troops and civilians. Of course He can't change the opinions of the "Hate America No Matter What" crowd...They'll never believe.

168 posted on 03/26/2003 1:33:47 PM PST by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast
There is a big difference between "the regime" wanting to use those weapons, and battlefield commanders actually using them. The reality is that once they use those weapons against us, we will get very, very nasty. And since such weapons probably will have a fairly limited tactical effect, it's quite a risk for them to use them.

I think we announce them if we get them, if only to shut up much of the rest of the world. Hey, the bottom line is that as we get closer to Baghdad, sooner or later the regime is going to figure out it has nothing left to lose. So we're gonna reach the point you worry about anyway. The key is whether the army will agree to use them, and I think world opinion may matter on that.

169 posted on 03/26/2003 1:35:25 PM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Sure would like confirmation from other source.

You and me both ... the waiting is killing me ...

170 posted on 03/26/2003 1:35:51 PM PST by 11th_VA (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
"Because the revelation is obscured by the "Christian" part of it."

Now you just think about that for a while.

171 posted on 03/26/2003 1:36:06 PM PST by bluecollarman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Of course, the implication is that there are WMD inside.

I don't think their is any such implication. They sealed the bunkers to keep people out.

They do not have time nor resources to go through the stuff. Another unit will do that when the threat level is lower.

172 posted on 03/26/2003 1:36:29 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman
Sean Hannity says he will call CBN and verify.
173 posted on 03/26/2003 1:36:39 PM PST by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman
OK. I don't particularly want to get into a big kerfuffle about Robertson.
174 posted on 03/26/2003 1:37:15 PM PST by merrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: JustinV
Well at least maybe we'll get to the bottom of it.
175 posted on 03/26/2003 1:37:34 PM PST by bluecollarman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

Did I just read correctly on a FOX scroll...Blix claims bio-suits etc...were placed there to throw us off or some such nonsense?
176 posted on 03/26/2003 1:38:06 PM PST by travelagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
I like both CBN and that Rosen kid's paper.
177 posted on 03/26/2003 1:38:39 PM PST by wardaddy (G-d speed our fighters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
I think we announce them if we get them, if only to shut up much of the rest of the world.

It not only won't shut up any of the rest of the world...it won't even change their minds one iota.

178 posted on 03/26/2003 1:39:24 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Please update us all on what Hannity finds out...
179 posted on 03/26/2003 1:39:50 PM PST by phasma proeliator (it's better to die with honor than to live without it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: merrin
Okay no kerfuffles.
180 posted on 03/26/2003 1:39:51 PM PST by bluecollarman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson