Skip to comments.
US Delegation Arrives in Amman on way to Baghdad for Cease Fire [Surrender]? [Al Jazeera]
UAE State Paper 'Alittihad' ^
| March 26, 2003
| staff report
Posted on 03/26/2003 5:06:19 AM PST by ewing
The UAE's leading semi official daily newspaper Alittihad reported today that a US Governemnt delegation has arrived in Amman, Jordan yesterday on its way to Baghdad for negioations with the Iraq Government about an immmediate ceasefire.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: arabdreaming; battleofbaghdad; disinformation; iraqifreedom; surrender; uaepaper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Doubtful..
1
posted on
03/26/2003 5:06:19 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
If true, this sounds more like a clean-up crew. The only way this ends is with Saddam and his goons heads on a spike.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gertz of the Washington Times says that we have contacted Saddams cronies in the past 4 days and are negoiating surrender terms to them.
3
posted on
03/26/2003 5:09:53 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
on its way to Baghdad for negioations with the Iraq Government We would be nuts to send US nationals into Baghdad, unless they were accompanied by 500 M1 Abrams.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Watch for the UN and Arab coalitions to try more and more of this bllsht. All these scum are quite comfortable with an Iraq ruled by Saddam. This is only the beginning of
phase2 of efforts to turn world opinion against this war.........
With our own home grown scum mounting peace protests in the UK and the USA. In sympathy with UN/Arab "peace" efforts.
5
posted on
03/26/2003 5:16:15 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: ewing
Bill Gertz is good and has excellent sources. However, we've been negotiating surrender with key Iraqi leadership since before the initial decapitation strike.
To: Semper Paratus
Do they mean outside of Baghdad?
7
posted on
03/26/2003 5:18:17 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
If this is true we better not start this peace talks with a cease fire
It should be talk while the war still goes on
8
posted on
03/26/2003 5:21:23 AM PST
by
uncbob
( building tomorrow)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I was thinking more of Vlad the Impaler.
9
posted on
03/26/2003 5:25:31 AM PST
by
machman
To: machman
I heard an interesting report yesterday that could tie things together.
They said the initial hit on Bahgdad last week to decapitate the Iraqi leadership left Hussien either physically dead or brain dead.
Two bunker busters missles where aimed at a target where they believed Sadaam was counting sheep, creating a "chiminey like" opening in which 30 tomahawk missles were guided through.
The exact depiction was, if Sadaam is not dead the resulting concussion of those missles would have rattled his brain so much it would have snapped his neck, forced "feces through the openings of his mouth and anus" and his brain to cease.
Further, there have been reports that Hussien was taken out on a stretcher and the Iraqi's called the Russians frantically looking for a brain specialist.
Assuming this is true could it be that this "convoy" heading south is putting up a last stand and whomever is in control of Bahgded getting ready to throw up their hands??
To: God luvs America
Interesting scenario, getting the hard core guys out of town..
11
posted on
03/26/2003 6:23:20 AM PST
by
ewing
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gertz said that they had contacted Saddams cronies and are dictating terms which leads me to believe that Saddam is proably brain dead or near death.
12
posted on
03/26/2003 6:24:23 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
Interesting scenario, getting the hard core guys out of town..And setting off WMD's inside Baghdad and balming it on us?
To: ewing
Agree that it is doubtful.
But, if Saddam is dead or near death, it explains a lot. All the orders to destroy oil wells and the terminals were either never issued or were not followed. If they were not followed, then it says that Saddam is no longer feared which means he is either dead or incapaciatated. If they were never issued, then he is dead or incapacitated.
There have been a lot of unused weapons, like antiship missiles from the USSR, never used and captured intact. That says command and control are non-existant. Any Iraqi military man will not operate independently without orders. Get killed that way. There are a lot of signd that Saddam is out of the picture.
14
posted on
03/26/2003 6:49:01 AM PST
by
KeyWest
To: Semper Paratus
For sure. And if there is one thing I would not want to be balmed with, that is WMD!
15
posted on
03/26/2003 6:58:32 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(JapanTV showed report on Kim Jong il. He watches CNN regularly. Imagine his thoughts watching Iraq!)
To: ewing
Yep. Knowing Al Jazerra, it's the US who wants the ceasefire, not Saddam.
16
posted on
03/26/2003 9:50:31 AM PST
by
rintense
(The tyrant will soon be gone... or extremely dead.)
To: ewing
I guess these Bozos didn't see Bush's address at McDill AFB today.
To: God luvs America
But...we saw the half eaten sandwich! < /sarcasm >
18
posted on
03/26/2003 9:53:37 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: ewing
Where is the B. S. Meter when you need it.
To: Calpernia
Ah, didn't we have a signed cease fire in 1991?
20
posted on
03/26/2003 9:54:25 AM PST
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson