Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recent Suicide Attacks May Signal Secret Iraqi Strategy: Beware of Sneak Attacks With Bioweapons
NewsPundit.net ^ | 3/25/2003 | Douglas Oliver

Posted on 03/25/2003 5:55:57 PM PST by ex-Texan

Recent Suicide Attacks May Signal Secret Iraqi Strategy: Beware of Sneak Attacks With Bioweapons

We have all heard about the recent strategies employed by Saddam's elite Republican Guard. These new strategies have been carefully thought-out. They involve deception and the most vile of intentions. But more evil forms of ambush treachery may be unfolding in just a few days.

First we heard reports of Iraqi troops pretending to surrender and then attacking at the last moment. Then we heard reports that Saddam's elite forces were throwing off their uniforms and dressing as civilians. Reportedly, they are hiding in civilian homes waiting to attack U.S. and British troops entering major Iraqi cities. Most recently we have learned about two suicide missions that were undertaken: One was by an Iraqi dressed as a civilian, and the other was by an American in the 101st Airborne who carried out a grenade attack on his unit.

Make no mistake. The lone American who attacked sleeping comrades in arms was on a obvious suicide mission; he most certainly did not expect to survive.

He killed one soldier instantly with a grenade and severely injured 15 others with his rifle. First he tossed grenades into three tents and then ambushed bleary eyed soldiers as they fled his attack. There is an excellent article by Daniel Pipes describing the attack and the apparent motivations of the traitor involved. (March 24, 2003)

The other attack was by an Iraqi "civilian" who penetrated behind coalition lines and reportedly destroyed a tank with a suicide bomb. That report is posted on Albawaba.com in this morning's news. (March 25, 2003)

I suspect these most recent attacks are just the "tip of the iceberg." Soon we may be hearing about Iraqi troops dressing as innocent civilians -- or elite Iraqi troops surrendering -- to deliver Weapons of Mass Destruction.

The ideal weapon of choice is a biological weapon. It may be very hard to prove Iraq's intentional use of a banned biological weapon, particularly if the bioweapon is delivered by infecting troops or innocent civilians.

But the Iraqis may be growing increasingly desperate very soon. They may lack the patience to use biological weapons, and decide to use chemical agents or a small suicase nuke. These types of treacherous attacks may be part of Saddam's secret Doomsday Scenario for America. (See my reports below).

(Excerpt) Read more at newspundit.net ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bioweapons; doomsdayscenario; homocidebombers; iraqifreedom; iraqistrategy; sneakattacks; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2003 5:55:57 PM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
As John Turturro said: "NEVER underestimate the sneakiness."
2 posted on 03/25/2003 6:02:36 PM PST by dasboot (The U.N. End it; don't mend it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; knak; MadIvan; ...
This would fit Saddam's MO alright!

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST

3 posted on 03/25/2003 6:08:09 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: ex-Texan
We are dealing with kooks in a psychotic area of the world who expect to undertake suicide missions with any kind of weapons. The only thing we can do is get in, kill Hussein, destroy any weapons that are found, get the hell out, quaranteen the area, shoot anybody trying to leave or export their beliefs, then expect to need to come back in 15 years to clobber Hussein's replacement.
5 posted on 03/25/2003 6:14:33 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Join us tonight as The Shrew interviews Robert Spencer author of "Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Religion" This should prove to be a fascinating and provocative interview about this highly timely topic. Additionally, The Shrew interviews Robert Nowacki of the Free Congress Foundation Judicial Review and we will discuss the filibuster of Miguel Estrada!

Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep! HIFI broadband feed HERE! (when available)

Would you like to receive a note when RadioFR is on the air? Send an email to radiofreerepublic-subscribe@radioactive.kicks-ass.net!

Click HERE to chat in the RadioFR chat room! OPEN AND CHATTING NOW!

Miss a show?

Click HERE for RadioFR Archives!

6 posted on 03/25/2003 6:14:45 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calcetines
I dunno, this business about a tank would probably be reported if it were true. How could a terrorist carry out a suicide bomb attack against a tank and succeed? The size of the bomb required to destroy a Merkava tank in Israel is usually at least 100kg--how is a suicide bomber going to wear that, and be reasonably agile? The anti-Merkava bombs in Israel are remotely detonated, they don't involve suicide. This report from AlBabwa smells like complete BS. Maybe they just mean he ran out with an RPG, fired it, and then was killed--but can an RPG destroy one of our Abrams tanks?
7 posted on 03/25/2003 6:31:26 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
can an RPG destroy one of our Abrams tanks?


I doubt it...not sure a T72 can...
8 posted on 03/25/2003 6:47:25 PM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Keith
Well, I think 3 of our Abrams tanks were destroyed in the battle below Baghdad (but nobody was injured--at least on our side)
9 posted on 03/25/2003 6:48:41 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Some were when a bridge collapsed.
10 posted on 03/25/2003 7:10:38 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Keith
can an RPG destroy one of our Abrams tanks?

Hmmm, ...maybe if you get some axle grease, some dirty socks, and make a sticky bomb.....
11 posted on 03/25/2003 7:12:55 PM PST by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
This is not a normal enemy that is for sure. Those who don't even value their own lives are the most frightening. We can't even grasp their mind set.
12 posted on 03/25/2003 7:15:20 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Ya right.

And I shot down the space shuttle with my .50 cal!

Believe Dat!
13 posted on 03/25/2003 7:23:09 PM PST by Sabretooth (Cant wait for CCW to pass in MN. Someday :()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Here's what the CIA had to say about it October 2002. And you have to keep in mind that the CIA doesn't like to put positive,definite statements in reports. They like to fuzz it and say either is possible. That way no one can say they screwed up. But there are a lot of definite statements here, from

CIA Report on Iraqi WMD.

This is why this war had to be fought. Forget freeing the Iraqi people and that other stuff; this was a problem that needed to be fixed before it got worse.

And the trick surrenders, changing from uniforms to civvies, etc. - those are major war crimes. So the Iraqis are plenty treacherous. I'm sure now we aren't expecting them to play by the rules. What they understand is an iron fist (what they're used to).

. . .

Baghdad has begun renewed production of chemical warfare agents, probably including mustard, sarin, cyclosarin, and VX.  Its capability was reduced during the UNSCOM inspections and is probably more limited now than it was at the time of the Gulf war, although VX production and agent storage life probably have been improved.

* Saddam probably has stocked a few hundred metric tons of CW agents.

* The Iraqis have experience in manufacturing CW bombs, artillery rockets, and projectiles, and probably possess CW bulk fills for SRBM warheads, including for a limited number of covertly stored, extended-range Scuds.

All key aspects—R&D, production, and weaponization—of Iraq's offensive BW program are active and most elements are larger and more advanced than they were before the Gulf war.

* Iraq has some lethal and incapacitating BW agents and is capable of quickly producing and weaponizing a variety of such agents, including anthrax, for delivery by bombs, missiles, aerial sprayers, and covert operatives, including potentially against the US Homeland.

* Baghdad has established a large-scale, redundant, and concealed BW agent production capability, which includes mobile facilities; these facilities can evade detection, are highly survivable, and can exceed the production rates Iraq had prior to the Gulf war.

Iraq maintains a small missile force and several development programs, including for a UAV that most analysts believe probably is intended to deliver biological warfare agents.

* Gaps in Iraqi accounting to UNSCOM suggest that Saddam retains a covert force of up to a few dozen Scud-variant SRBMs with ranges of 650 to 900 km.

* Iraq is deploying its new al-Samoud and Ababil-100 SRBMs, which are capable of flying beyond the UN-authorized 150-km range limit.

* Baghdad's UAVs—especially if used for delivery of chemical and biological warfare (CBW) agents—could threaten Iraq's neighbors, US forces in the Persian Gulf, and the United States if brought close to, or into, the US Homeland.

Iraq is developing medium-range ballistic missile capabilities, largely through foreign assistance in building specialized facilities.

14 posted on 03/25/2003 7:29:36 PM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calcetines
Which begs one to wonder, just what are the level of the real casualties versus what is reported.
15 posted on 03/25/2003 9:08:00 PM PST by Stavka2 (Setting the record straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Why? The US and British government covered up a disasterous training episode that was a work up for D-Day, in which several thousand soldiers died from drowing and various mishaps. Documents on this only recently (6 years or so ago) became declassified in the US and are still classified for another 20 years in England.
16 posted on 03/25/2003 9:09:45 PM PST by Stavka2 (Setting the record straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: xm177e2
Problem is this: the US advantage is equipment, the Iraqi is manpower. So, right now we are lossing mostly equipment not personal. Problem is, once the equipment goes down from destruction, damage or wear and tear, personal casualties will quickly escillate. I'm betting that at least a fifth of those tanks are one the edge or breaking...tanks are extremely maintenace heavy.
18 posted on 03/25/2003 9:14:11 PM PST by Stavka2 (Setting the record straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Well, the US should since it fought against Germans, Japanese, Koreans and Vietnamese who all had the same out look to one degree or another.
19 posted on 03/25/2003 9:15:26 PM PST by Stavka2 (Setting the record straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
There's only one reason why Saddam would let our forces advance so far w/o breaking out the Bio/Chems....he has a nuke, and probably not one he built.
20 posted on 03/25/2003 9:20:01 PM PST by ez (Advise and Consent = Debate and VOTE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson