Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hail of Gunfire and Grenades Forces Apaches to Pull Back
New York Times ^ | Monday, March 24, 2003 | By JIM DWYER

Posted on 03/24/2003 11:39:39 AM PST by JohnHuang2

March 24, 2003

Hail of Gunfire and Grenades Forces Apaches to Pull Back

By JIM DWYER

IN CENTRAL IRAQ, March 24 - With a hail of small arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades, Iraqi forces downed two Apache helicopters today and forced 30 other helicopters in their brigade back to their base.

One two-member crew was unaccounted for; the other was rescued. Iraqi state television broadcast images of one downed helicopter, which appeared largely intact, and jubilant men dancing around it.

All 32 helicopters sustained some damage, occasionally slight, Army officials said, in what was a significant setback for the allies.

Fighting continued today in Nasiriya, meanwhile, after the death of 10 marines there on Sunday in the deadliest battle of the war so far.

The attack on the helicopters today surprised American Army leaders and may cause them to adjust their military strategy, which relied on the Apaches to destroy Iraq's armored divisions that ring Baghdad.

The commander of the American-led invasion of Iraq confirmed the loss of one Apache helicopter.

``The fate of the crew is uncertain right now,'' Gen. Tommy R. Franks said at a news briefing at Central Command in Qatar. We characterize that crew, two men, as missing in action.''

General Franks denied that the helicopter had been shot down by farmers, as Iraq claimed, but did not say what had forced it out of the air.

A CNN correspondent accompanying the United States Army Fifth Corps 11th Attack Helicopter Regiment, said the unit had been on a night-time combat mission targeting units of the elite Republican Guard.

The correspondent cited one of the pilots as saying they had run into a ``hornet's nest, a barrage of antiaircraft fire,'' near the city of Kerbala, 70 miles southwest of Baghdad, the closest fighting to the Iraqi capital since the war began last Thursday.

The Iraqi Information Minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, said at a news conference: ``Farmers shot down two Apaches. We showed one today and might show the second and the pilots.''

``We are holding several other American and British prisoners and we may show some of them,'' the minister said.

The Apaches use a powerful radar, called the Longbow, that directs their Hellfire missiles.

But the Apaches are suddenly coming under attack from relatively low-technology weaponry.

Saddam Hussein ``is fighting an asymmetrical warfare,'' said Brig. Gen. Benjamin Freakly, assistant commander of the 101st Division. ``This is not tank on tank fighting.''

The attack took place near the village of Abu Mustafe, north of Al Hillah, and capped a punishing 24 hours for the allied offensive.

General Freakly said that in an attack like the one on the helicopters, ``you have 10 guys lying on top of a building firing R.P.G.'s and small arms. You can go in and bomb that building and reduce it to rubble,'' but at the potential cost of many civilian lives.

The Army now may consider new tactics, such as additional close aerial bombardment, to support the Apaches as they hunt for armored divisions.

The Apaches were from the 11th Aviation Regiment, based in Germany, and are attached to the V Corps.

Sandstorms are roiling the area, blowing at 25 knots, and are likely to rise to 40 knots on Tuesday and Wednesday. At 30 knots, a meteorologist said, visibility becomes practically nil.

General Franks also said today that the tenacity of some Iraqi units, including the fedayeen, was no surprise and that American-led forces had had some ``terrific firefights.''

The Republican Guard has been hit, he said, and ``they will continue to be hit, at points and places and times that make sense to us. The effect has been very positive for us.''


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abumustafe; apache; cas; republicanguard; roadtobaghdad; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Operation Iraqi Freedom: Day 4

"It was the toughest day of resistance that we've had thus far," U.S. Army General John Abizaid told reporters at Central Command headquarters Sunday. "We understand that there may be other tough days ahead of us but the outcome is still certain."

The General, in other words, sees victory ahead for the good guys.

So does his boss, CENTCOM Commander Gen. Tommy Franks.

Speaking to reporters Saturday, he said "this [war] will be a campaign unlike any other in history...characterized by shock, by surprise, by flexibility, by employment of precise munitions on a scale never before seen and by application of overwhelming force."

The outcome? While "tough days" lie ahead, Gen. Franks predicts "The outcome is not in doubt."

Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said "We're basically on our plan and moving towards Baghdad" and to victory.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld agrees.

"The closer we get to Baghdad, the greater the pressure, the more likely" the Iraqi military surrenders, he said Sunday.

Rummy's boss, Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush, struck a similar tone yesterday.

"This is just the beginning of a tough fight," said the President, returning to Washington from a weekend at Camp David. "We are slowly but surely achieving our objective."

Hold on, there -- not so fast, says the media. Abizaid, Franks, Myers, Rumsfeld and Bush are all wrong. Have they consulted military experts Peter Arnett or Eleanor Clift? Apparently not. Heck, they refuse to confer even with famed Helen Thomas, unrivaled military strategist who writes editorials for a living.

Day 4 into Operation Iraqi Freedom, and the press says it's had enough -- its patience has worn out, completely. It's tired of waiting for Allied victory. What's taking this war so long? C'mon, it's been a full -- whopping -- 99+ hours, so why isn't Iraq Switzerland yet? Where are the new shopping malls? Where's the new Parliament? What? No free and open elections yet? Why not?

It's not like Iraq had an army -- 400,000 regular troops, 23 divisions and Republican Guard units -- or anything. They don't. Well, okay, they do.

But...

After 4 days, all pockets of resistance should disappear -- everywhere, magically; every route, every road, every bridge completely secured; Saddam's elite Republican Guard should either be working for Habitat for Humanity or conducting seminars on human rights. It's been 4 days, already! Sheesh!

Saddam's specially trained guerrillas and security forces? Should be on street corners selling Girls Scout Cookies and waving Old Glory by now.

After 4 days, all of this could flawlessly be achieved with zero U.S. casualties, zero POWs, no friendly-fire, zero errors -- no mistakes, no slips, no flubs, no foul-ups or missteps, whatsoever.

Instead, the media says not only is America losing, the war's already been lost; we're bogged down -- in the middle of a protracted, 4-day quagmire, you see.

So how badly did we lose this war?

Not a pretty picture -- brace yourself. Coalition forces were so badly defeated, in fact, they now own southern Iraq. Invincible Republican Guard forces were swept invincibly from Umm Qasr to Basra; both towns were, in another stinging setback for coalition forces, liberated by coalition forces. 'Out-flanked' and 'out-maneuvered,' coalition forces marched on to 'defeat' in Nassiriyah, capturing the city, forcing Saddam's 51st Division into surrender, including top commanders. 'Foiled' and 'stymied,' coalition forces have now converged on Baghdad -- the Third U.S. Infantry Division on the outskirts of the capital, poised to strike. The Jerusalem Post, citing Pentagon officials, reports coalition forces captured a 'huge' chemical weapons facility near Najaf -- the smoking gun.

So, we're days away from liberating every square inch of a country the size of California.

Some defeat, eh?

The shocking images of captured American POWs paraded on enemy TV were truly disgusting and revolting; their barbaric treatment only underscores the monsterous nature of the Saddam regime.

Our thoughts and our prayers are with them and with their loved ones; we pray for their safe return home.

God bless our President, God bless our troops and God bless the United States of America!

My two cents..
"JohnHuang2"

Monday, March 24, 2003

Quote of the Day by Erasmus

1 posted on 03/24/2003 11:39:39 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
President Bush MUST change the rules of engagement immediately!!!! Any house or building that has a gun firing out a window is a legitimate target. This "PC" war of not firing on civilian targets is ridiculous.
2 posted on 03/24/2003 11:42:10 AM PST by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good Rebuttal, but....The Article you are rebutting is Yesterdays news, even if it was printed in TODAYS NYSlimes.

The Latest article says those AAA installations are the subject of massive bombing, which makes the purpose of the Apache run Clear (drawing them out...)

3 posted on 03/24/2003 11:44:56 AM PST by hobbes1 (White Devils for Sharpton....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G-Bob; af_vet_rr; MindBender26; LSUfan; Maximum Leader
Bump.
4 posted on 03/24/2003 11:46:56 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
President Bush MUST change the rules of engagement immediately!!!! Any house or building that has a
gun firing out a window is a legitimate target. This "PC" war of not firing on civilian targets is ridiculous


AMEN to That!
5 posted on 03/24/2003 11:48:04 AM PST by texson66 (Those who fail to study the past are condemed to repeat it. Those who fail to study the ........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Is this the battle that took out 70plus Iraqi tanks?
6 posted on 03/24/2003 11:48:13 AM PST by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I almost hate to say this, but where are all these guys who have been telling us here for years that "you wouldn't stand a chance against an Apache helicopter!" Seems the Iraqi Infantry wern't listening. So at the end of the day it comes down to a man with a gun and will. Sorry to say it, but I have been hearing this "you wouldn't stand a chance" stuff for over a decade now. Here a bunch of turban totin' bedouins can drive off 32 gunships, I think maybe 60 million Americans can probably manage to keep our firearms.
7 posted on 03/24/2003 11:49:13 AM PST by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It would seem that the Apaches came in low to the ground to approach Iraqi armor. The Iraqis knew the firing distances of Hellfires and peppered the ground with lots of infantry. The downed Apache was said to have its missiles still on it. So you can say that the Iraqis are adapting.

On the other hand, the Army fired ATACMS missiles at the Media position, which has a type of "brilliant" cluster warhead, which finds and kills individual armored vehicles. Against this, the Iraqis have no defense.

Still, Medina must have taken a lot of hits.
8 posted on 03/24/2003 11:49:38 AM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
Somebody Explain the "Fire Point Control Line" per Gen. McInerny on Fox.
9 posted on 03/24/2003 11:52:56 AM PST by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
Do you mean the Fire Support Coordination Line (FSCL)?
10 posted on 03/24/2003 11:54:16 AM PST by TADSLOS (Sua Sponte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
Perhaps that was it. He is generally explaining that the Army is too far back and the air support can't be effective.
11 posted on 03/24/2003 11:54:58 AM PST by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This will be a popular question, I'm sure (NOT).

Has anyone heard, who were the pilots of that apache helicoter that was 'SOFT LANDED' with full weaponry intact behind enemy lines?

These state-of-the-art helicopters have a simple self destruct mechanism built in so in case of a forced landing, the highly classified hardware/software would be totally destroyed...especially those missiles! If they were going down, the missiles could have at least been fired.

THis entire situation smells of some more agents inside our armed forces.
12 posted on 03/24/2003 11:55:44 AM PST by steplock ( http://www.spadata.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
It must have been tough for our Apache crews to have to bug out, in order to follow our standing orders that, when in doubt, do not engage. Nighttime engagements are most difficult when operating under these orders, because INFRARED does not identify the enemy well at all.

I'm proud of our crews.

I'd bet that our guys are already thinking up some tricks for making Saddam's terrorists screw up and expose themselves to the Apaches.

Trying to identify Saddam's tanks at night, when the tanks are embedded in built-up rural areas, is obviously going to attract attention to the loud Apache. We need some diversions with which to keep Saddam's troops busy while the Apaches attend to the hardware.

13 posted on 03/24/2003 11:58:31 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
With a hail of small arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades, Iraqi forces downed two Apache helicopters today and forced 30 other helicopters in their brigade back to their base.

I think that this would call for a little Napalm or Fuel-Air bombs followed closely by C-130 Gun Ships.

14 posted on 03/24/2003 11:59:02 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Ding, Dong Soddom is DEAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Sorry, the purpose of the Apache Longbow is not to draw out AAA. This WAS a set back if we didn't get any of the objectives. It sounds bad IMHO.

Kudos to the builders/designers of the Apache though. Got our men through it.

15 posted on 03/24/2003 12:00:18 PM PST by madison46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steplock
Our guys are under standing orders to not hit anything but known Saddam troops and targets. When surrounded at night by the appearance of angry farmers around the aircraft, that pretty much ended the self-destruct option.
16 posted on 03/24/2003 12:00:29 PM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
I wasn't listening to the General's remark, but if he's talking about the FSCL, it is a control measure the military uses to delineate a coordination requirement between friendly forces for using fire support (artillery/CAS/Naval Gunfire). Any fires used up to the FSCL must be coordinated before firing. Any fires beyond the FSCL can be planned and fired without coordination. With regards to his statement about being too far back, that one doesn't make sense, other than perhaps he means that conventional artillery fires were not in play due to the depth of the attack. ATACMs were used however. They are designed for deep strike. Reports are that 30 ATACMs were fired. That's ALOT of ordnance!
17 posted on 03/24/2003 12:01:51 PM PST by TADSLOS (Sua Sponte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: madison46
Well, leaving aside that they took out 70 tanks......


(Which was probably a primary assignment....)
18 posted on 03/24/2003 12:03:16 PM PST by hobbes1 (White Devils for Sharpton....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: madison46
sorry, the purpose of the Apache Longbow is not to draw out AAA.

P.S....How do you draw them out, without presenting a target worthy of attacking?

19 posted on 03/24/2003 12:04:28 PM PST by hobbes1 (White Devils for Sharpton....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
Yes.
20 posted on 03/24/2003 12:04:59 PM PST by hobbes1 (White Devils for Sharpton....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson