Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key Developments Concerning Iraq
AP | Monday, March 24, 2003

Posted on 03/24/2003 11:36:13 AM PST by JohnHuang2

Key Developments Concerning Iraq

.c The Associated Press

Coalition planes targeted Republican Guard forces just south of Baghdad in perhaps the largest assault to date on Saddam Hussein's highly trained troops, U.S. officials said.

Gen. Tommy Franks said Saddam's regime is weakened but still issuing orders to military units - which are not always complying. Franks said his forces have captured 3,000 prisoners.

Coalition troops pressed toward Baghdad but many were halted by a sandstorm near the holy city of Karbala, 50 miles to the south.

Troops farther south were facing deadly ambushes and discovering that many Iraqi fighters had discarded their uniforms in favor of civilian clothes. In the Rumailah oil fields, five Iraqis in civilian clothes who appeared to be surrendering fired machine guns at British soldiers. U.S. Brig. Gen. Vincent Brooks said seven fires were burning in the field.

In hopes of showing that he remained at the helm, Saddam boasted in a televised speech that ``victory will be ours soon.'' U.S. and British officials said the language was so general that it was unclear when the tape was made.

Iraq claimed to have shot down two U.S. helicopters and taken pilots prisoner, a day after more than 20 Americans were killed or captured. Franks said two pilots were missing, but he dismissed reports the helicopter was downed by ``farmers.''

In his first appearance since the start of the war, Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz held a news conference at a downtown Baghdad hotel. Aziz said the Iraqi leadership is in ``good shape'' and that Saddam is in ``full control'' of the army and the country.

Baghdad came under another heavy air attack but life returned to many streets later in the day, with stores reopening and traffic heavy in some areas. Authorities dug trenches around military offices as smoke from fires set to conceal bombing targets hung over the city.

The northern front appeared to be building, with American planes landing in Kurdish territory and airstrikes pounding positions of an Islamic group with alleged al-Qaida and Baghdad ties. Coalition warplanes bombed military barracks near Kurdish-held Chamchamal, near the oil center of Kirkuk.

A British soldier was killed in combat in southern Iraq, the first such British death since the war began. Sixteen other British servicemen have died, in two helicopter accidents and the downing of a British jet by friendly fire from a U.S. missile battery. Two others were reported missing.

President Bush planned to tell congressional leaders that the war will cost between $70 billion and $80 billion.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan warned of a humanitarian crisis in Basra, scene of fierce fighting. Annan said ``urgent measures'' were needed to restore the city's electricity and water supply.

A U.S. missile hit a passenger bus in Iraq that was carrying Syrian civilians fleeing the war, killing five and wounding 10, according to Syria's official news agency.

A U.S. envoy rushed back to Turkey to discuss Turkish plans to send troops into northern Iraq despite Washington's objections. The European Union head office also warned Turkey not to enter northern Iraq, hinting that doing so would damage its chances of joining the 15-nation bloc.

Oil prices surged after the stiffening resistance from Iraqi troops raised fears the war might take longer than anticipated.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: oilfieldfires; pows; roadtobaghdad; surrender; warcrimes; warlist
Monday, March 24, 2003

Quote of the Day by Erasmus

1 posted on 03/24/2003 11:36:13 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Without reading the article(yet), remember it's an AP story, so take with a grain of salt! I have become so SKEPTICAL of the media and their anti-war headlines, that I don't believe every piece of crap they fork over! Nothing can shock me anymore!
2 posted on 03/24/2003 11:42:51 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Troops farther south were facing deadly ambushes and discovering that many Iraqi fighters had discarded their uniforms in favor of civilian clothes. In the Rumailah oil fields, five Iraqis in civilian clothes who appeared to be surrendering fired machine guns at British soldiers.

Don't we have a 'Napalm' option when this nonsense happens?

3 posted on 03/24/2003 11:47:15 AM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The key line in this news summary is the massive understatement:
Coalition planes targeted Republican Guard forces just south of Baghdad in perhaps the largest assault to date on Saddam Hussein's highly trained troops, U.S. officials said.
It is the money quote and suggests that V Corps is not going any further north, but will now move in strength through the Karbalah gap. Anecdotal reports suggest that defenses along the Euphrates river valley are collapsing and the Marines are moving forward again. The attack to Baghdad's southern defenses will create an additional problem for the IRG. They must choose: switch to the west to support the remnants of Medina IRG against V Corps or abandon the southern door to the Marines.
4 posted on 03/24/2003 11:55:12 AM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *war_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
5 posted on 03/24/2003 12:10:23 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I am having some problems with strategy and tactics here.

1. With all the "shock & awe" bombing, the Ministry of Defense in Baghdad remains untouched.
Why? Why are we bombing empty, deserted government offices, while a center of military operations remains standing?

2. Karbalah Gap.
Descriptions of the area by Franks, et al, indicates a "choke point" over the Euphrates River..
It would seem to me that this is obviously a matter of defensive position.
If You're having trouble with enemy forces keeping armor and troops from crossing, you set up defensive perimeters to eliminate those enemy troops, or keep them from coming within effective range, preferably not even within maximum range.
Maybe it takes a battallion, or even a division, but that's what You do to get the needed forces where they have to go.
The LAST thing You do is come on television and complain that Iraqi irregulars are keeping your forces from crossing the Euphrates.
Unacceptable.

6 posted on 03/24/2003 12:20:24 PM PST by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Related: Does anyone know if the elite Republican Guards fought in the first Gulf War?
7 posted on 03/24/2003 12:24:06 PM PST by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
I have not seen the "Shock and Awe" yet, for I see that
Baghdad is up and running strong. It seems that Allied bombs do not do much damage, for they hit a building and it is left standing and looks repairable. As long as Iraqi Infomation is running, we have nothing to brag about.
8 posted on 03/24/2003 12:47:24 PM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thanks for the summary post.

I usually like to check out Drudge's page for a quick review of highlights but I refuse to do so till he gets those POW photos off of there.
9 posted on 03/24/2003 12:58:14 PM PST by GretchenEE (France: Help Chirac retire early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson