Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC- American Troops Have Found A Second Chemical Plant In Iraq
MSNBC | 3/23/03

Posted on 03/23/2003 9:15:34 PM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-216 last
To: CatOwner
Nonsense, the Pentagon never claimed it was a chemical weapons plant.
201 posted on 03/24/2003 7:06:42 AM PST by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
You sound like a RAT who refuses to see all sides of a story. Fine. I for one hate for more PR crap to laid at the steps of the anti-war groups and the media.
202 posted on 03/24/2003 7:07:15 AM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

quote:


And I thought it was baby milk? Chemistry is sooooooo confusing.



How many babies do you have to squeeze to get 1 pint of baby milk? ;-)

I remember that farce from GW-I. What a joke!




203 posted on 03/24/2003 8:19:04 AM PST by Liberals Reek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
Huh?

Haven't a clue as to what you posted but please don't bother to explain.

204 posted on 03/24/2003 8:26:13 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: gcochran
"Of course, it's not particularlyy hard to turn a chemical plant into a nerve gas plant; supposedly any third-year chemistry student is up to the job."

And we're teaching the Iraqis at OUR universities!

205 posted on 03/24/2003 8:27:22 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Liberals Reek
Yes, should we pull out the cartoons with the camel scud launchers????? I have a whole folder of editorial cartoons from the GW1
206 posted on 03/24/2003 8:46:41 AM PST by cherry_bomb88 (www.serviceflags.com ~ check the "rules" to see if you can fly one & show support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
I dunno, how many chemical factories are run my a general? Or another way: doesn't the fact that the chemical factory is run by a general lead to a presumption that it is for military purposes? It could be legit, (e.g., high explosives, sun screen) but time will tell.
207 posted on 03/24/2003 9:35:59 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: woofer
'...and baby milk formula in the summertime, when we don't need the salt.'

But sometimes we need to combine the salt and the baby formula for children who are dehydrated by listening to the infidels talk radio. This is simple chemistry. Sometimes we disperse vast clouds of this mixture to treat many people at once. Sometimes there are side effects, but this is caused by spies.

208 posted on 03/24/2003 10:16:19 AM PST by talleyman (These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA - seriesly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: talleyman
I'm sorry, I meant to send you mustard, not mustard gas. My bad! ;o)

Without wit & sarcasm life would be so dull!!! :o)
209 posted on 03/24/2003 10:42:25 AM PST by cherry_bomb88 (I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Maedhros
Ignorance is Blix.

Clever!

210 posted on 03/24/2003 10:43:01 AM PST by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
Pentagon: no chems found; factory believed abandoned long ago. Check this link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/874059/posts
211 posted on 03/24/2003 11:18:33 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
Actually they did.. when it broke on Fox they listed it as a Chemical Weapons Facility, then changed it to a chemical facility.
212 posted on 03/24/2003 9:38:42 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy
Was that the Pentagon, though, or was it just FOX?
213 posted on 03/25/2003 6:22:49 AM PST by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
I'm quoting FOX... FOX backed off the story with the Pentagon actually made mention of it.
214 posted on 03/25/2003 2:18:17 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
I have come back to this thread to apologize for being so blunt with you. From the looks of things, it appears your caution is justified.

I'm very sorry.
215 posted on 03/26/2003 5:10:36 PM PST by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. I would have rather been wrong here, and for all I know I might still be. What's the possibility that this type of information is being withheld from US and Allied citizens?
216 posted on 03/26/2003 5:28:31 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-216 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson