Skip to comments.
MSNBC- American Troops Have Found A Second Chemical Plant In Iraq
MSNBC
| 3/23/03
Posted on 03/23/2003 9:15:34 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-216 last
To: CatOwner
Nonsense, the Pentagon never claimed it was a chemical weapons plant.
To: OldFriend
You sound like a RAT who refuses to see all sides of a story. Fine. I for one hate for more PR crap to laid at the steps of the anti-war groups and the media.
quote:
And I thought it was baby milk? Chemistry is sooooooo confusing.
How many babies do you have to squeeze to get 1 pint of baby milk? ;-)
I remember that farce from GW-I. What a joke!
To: CatOwner
Huh?
Haven't a clue as to what you posted but please don't bother to explain.
To: gcochran
"Of course, it's not particularlyy hard to turn a chemical plant into a nerve gas plant; supposedly any third-year chemistry student is up to the job."And we're teaching the Iraqis at OUR universities!
205
posted on
03/24/2003 8:27:22 AM PST
by
Redbob
To: Liberals Reek
Yes, should we pull out the cartoons with the camel scud launchers????? I have a whole folder of editorial cartoons from the GW1
206
posted on
03/24/2003 8:46:41 AM PST
by
cherry_bomb88
(www.serviceflags.com ~ check the "rules" to see if you can fly one & show support)
To: CatOwner
I dunno, how many chemical factories are run my a general? Or another way: doesn't the fact that the chemical factory is run by a general lead to a presumption that it is for military purposes? It could be legit, (e.g., high explosives, sun screen) but time will tell.
To: woofer
'...and baby milk formula in the summertime, when we don't need the salt.' But sometimes we need to combine the salt and the baby formula for children who are dehydrated by listening to the infidels talk radio. This is simple chemistry. Sometimes we disperse vast clouds of this mixture to treat many people at once. Sometimes there are side effects, but this is caused by spies.
208
posted on
03/24/2003 10:16:19 AM PST
by
talleyman
(These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA - seriesly)
To: talleyman
I'm sorry, I meant to send you mustard, not mustard gas. My bad! ;o)
Without wit & sarcasm life would be so dull!!! :o)
209
posted on
03/24/2003 10:42:25 AM PST
by
cherry_bomb88
(I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person)
To: Maedhros
Ignorance is Blix. Clever!
To: goody2shooz
211
posted on
03/24/2003 11:18:33 AM PST
by
kevao
To: Sofa King
Actually they did.. when it broke on Fox they listed it as a Chemical Weapons Facility, then changed it to a chemical facility.
To: Almondjoy
Was that the Pentagon, though, or was it just FOX?
213
posted on
03/25/2003 6:22:49 AM PST
by
Sofa King
(-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS!)
To: Sofa King
I'm quoting FOX... FOX backed off the story with the Pentagon actually made mention of it.
To: CatOwner
I have come back to this thread to apologize for being so blunt with you. From the looks of things, it appears your caution is justified.
I'm very sorry.
215
posted on
03/26/2003 5:10:36 PM PST
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
To: Humidston
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. I would have rather been wrong here, and for all I know I might still be. What's the possibility that this type of information is being withheld from US and Allied citizens?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-216 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson