Skip to comments.
Why the sanatization? (MUSLIM who committed the terrorist act at Camp Pennsylvania.)
3/23/2003
| ME
Posted on 03/23/2003 3:15:19 PM PST by TheBattman
As predicted by many on this forum last night, the terrorist who was aprehended after killing one US soldier and injuring many more with a grenade attack on commanding officer's tent no longer is being identified as Muslim.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 101stattack; blackmuslims; muslim; pc; soldier; terrorist; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Excuse me - but they have now published his name - identifiable easily as a Muslim name. Why must we endure this sanatization of the news by the PC police? Why must GW encourage such activities?
I actually emailed several friends and family regarding this news event, with links to news sites with the story. In the time it took for them to read the email and check the link, the stories had all been edited with the "Muslim" part removed.
For those who are slow to the news, I looked like an idiot. Obviously, this doesn't help my feelings right now - but that's beside the point. The real issue is - a MUSLIM in the ranks of our military in fact pulled off a terrorist attack against our own soldiers. I honestly don't see any way to separate (or a reason too) these facts.
Just another sign that the PC crowd rules the media and the world.
To: TheBattman
MSNBC just reported that Asan Akbar did it because he opposed the war in Iraq and opposed the killing of Muslims. I guess it's OK for Saddam to kill hundreds of thousands of Muslims, though.
2
posted on
03/23/2003 3:19:04 PM PST
by
AF68
To: TheBattman
there's an interesting discussion on this
here. perhaps the most interesting notation is from jonah goldberg: "MSNBC reporting that two high-ranking military sources say Akbar was opposed to the war. He was not 'disgruntled' about not being deployed, as first reported. He was opposed to the killing of Muslims."
dep
3
posted on
03/23/2003 3:20:02 PM PST
by
dep
To: AF68
MSNBC just reported that Asan Akbar did it because he opposed the war in Iraq and opposed the killing of Muslims. I guess it's OK for Saddam to kill hundreds of thousands of Muslims, though. will it be too "un-PC" to court martial him for killing a superior officer? Or do we have to run the gamut of the double standard again?
4
posted on
03/23/2003 3:22:33 PM PST
by
kstewskis
(Hang the bastard)
To: AF68
This is the "Elephant in the Room" story that no one in the media is willing to touch. This PC garbage is way out of hand. Our country needs an intelligent public debate on this subject NOW.
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: AF68
Apparently Muslims murdering Muslims is okay.
7
posted on
03/23/2003 3:30:53 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: TheBattman
ABC Live via the internet identified him as Muslim several times today. I've been tuned in all day, pretty fair coverage so far.
To: TheBattman
Maybe not every news outlet is doing so, but I just heard a report a couple of hours ago that gave his muslim name, and the fact that he is a sergeant, but the report went further to state that it is not known whether he changed his name after converting to Muslim.
You may want to watch Fox News, then pay attention.
9
posted on
03/23/2003 3:50:17 PM PST
by
billhilly
To: TheBattman
Sanitization? Where? He was a crazy engineer.
Well, that's what the media said. [/sarcasm]
10
posted on
03/23/2003 3:50:39 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.)
To: TheBattman
KUWAIT (Reuters) - One U.S. soldier was killed and 15 were wounded in a grenade attack at a tented command center in Kuwait on Sunday, and the military said a U.S. serviceman was being held as a suspect.
A military source told Reuters the suspect was a Muslim, and apparently committed the attack out of anger over the war. At Camp Pennsylvania, the Kuwait base for the 1st Brigade, 101st Airborne Division, Brigade commander Col. Ben Hodges said that a grenade had been rolled into each of three tents at the command area.
Time magazine correspondent Jim Lacey, who witnessed the attack, described scenes of what he called chaos and carnage when the grenades exploded, saying soldiers thought they had come under Iraqi missile attack. . . .
Lacey identified the suspect as a sergeant from an engineering unit attached to the division, which was preparing to move into Iraq to join the invasion when the attack took place. He described the man as disgruntled and said he had been "acting strange."
A military source said the man was a Muslim who was upset by the U.S.- led invasion of Iraq, a Muslim country.
"He's a Muslim, and it seems he was just against the war," the source, who did not wish to be identified, said.
dep
11
posted on
03/23/2003 3:52:07 PM PST
by
dep
To: TheBattman
ABC Network just identified him as a muslim convert and gave his name. I think this is too big for immediate PC damage control, but stay tuned, the fix is in.
To: The Ghost of Richard Nixon
And now they're running his real name -- Mike Kool. Changed it to As* Whatever after he joined the service.
To: TheBattman
Oh, we cant let anyone know that he was a Muslim. That wouldn't be politically correct. After all, "Islam is the religion of peace." Just ask Saddam. Or Arafat. Or Hafez Assad (glad he's burning in hell...) Or Osama.
Dont you know that according to the liberal media elite, only white Christian males and Israelis are murderers?
To: rageaholic
Fox correspondant with british accent said the same, he was muslim and against killing of muslims. I'm sorry but this country was not designed for "self censored" nor was it's military, and the sooner we have a national policy that reflects that, the sooner we will be on the road to eliminating this particular festering sore that will, if untreated, contribute further to our national unrest. JMHO.
15
posted on
03/23/2003 3:58:44 PM PST
by
wita
To: TheBattman
this is just like that shooting at LAX. They played down those things as well, to make it look like it wasn't a terrorist attack.
16
posted on
03/23/2003 3:59:35 PM PST
by
yonif
To: wita
you're entirely right, which makes it all the sadder that there are long threads here today of people proposing that self-censorship is the way to go. really troubling.
dep
17
posted on
03/23/2003 4:00:34 PM PST
by
dep
To: dep
It's the same treatment the govt gave the MUSLIM who shot up LAX last 4th of July. "Oh, he must have been upset about something." This soldier appears to have been trying to sabotage things from the moment he was deployed. These were the incidents he was being disciplined for in the first place. No two ways about it.
18
posted on
03/23/2003 4:04:16 PM PST
by
Inkie
To: The Ghost of Richard Nixon
19
posted on
03/23/2003 4:07:54 PM PST
by
JCG
To: Inkie
you are, of course, aware that one john mohammed was cashiered out of the military for doing much the same thing with a thermite grenade, injuring 16.
dep
20
posted on
03/23/2003 4:08:37 PM PST
by
dep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson