[Joe Hadenuf]

Sigh, Again, you attack me but over look a few of the easy solutions in #249 and you attempt to accuse *me* of something sinister. LOL!

This is a glaring pattern of those to will do anything to change or divert the issue of our bleeding borders.

Attack those that speak out, shout them down, accuse them of being bigots, racist, and and Bush bashing ....Hehehe....It's painfully obvious my friend.....

In any event, lets hope the terrorist haven't made their way from Mexico into your home town.

[soccermatt34]

my guess is that the unknown substance is Ricin, which was recently found on an Iraqi in Paris.

[HairOfTheDog]

I am not supporting bleeding borders or trying to divert the issue. I am trying to get you to tell us what you want us to do!

I responded to 249, it wasn't your post. It offered a picture that was daunting. Which of the pieces of that wall did you want in our world? - the starving attack dogs, the land mines or the guards every twenty yards for our whole long land borders? - I don't think it was written as a road map of what would be practical here. I could protect my yard that way, Berlin could protect a city, but 22,000 miles of it?

The trouble is, you can't decide if illegal Mexicans are your biggest gripe or terrorists. Separate and argue them seperately and you mind win me over. Illegals are a financial, not security, issue.

And the "arrest the president" "blood on his hands" shouting is hysterical and sounds right out of DU. You may have good ideas. But your message is trapped behind words that are distracting. If you think everyone is diverting the issue into "Bush Bashing" and "Racism" perhaps look at your own words to see why.