The consequences are series.
1 posted on
03/17/2003 4:36:18 PM PST by
Happy2BMe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Happy2BMe
2 posted on
03/17/2003 4:36:47 PM PST by
Happy2BMe
(HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
To: Happy2BMe
THIS JUST IN: Foreign Minister of Human Slugs (apology to slugs worldwide)
and French Opportunists Villepin was asked what he thought of French arrogance, stupidity,
terrorophilicity, and incompetance. He stopped, shook his head, held his nose, and said,
"Oui, France is a shitty little country of cheese-eating surrender monkeys,
BUT we are now on the side of Greenpeace rather than attacking them. "
To: Happy2BMe
It is true, the consequences are serious. Seriously bad for the French, and seriously good for America.
4 posted on
03/17/2003 4:38:39 PM PST by
linear
To: Happy2BMe
Dumminique will always be remembered - on the page marked "history's greatest appeasers".....
To: Happy2BMe
The French seem bent on committing social suicide. They have elevated this problem far beyond they need to. There must be a significant interest on their part to keep Saddam in power.
To: Happy2BMe
Lessee; serious consequences:
- No more Arab weapons of mass destruction.
- The possibility of Arabs discovering the joys of democracy.
- Israel surviving. Definitely serious. Definitely NOT what the Frogs wanted.
7 posted on
03/17/2003 4:39:30 PM PST by
steveegg
(Remove 1 leg from the UN and you get LN (League of Nations). The French are sawing away now.)
To: Happy2BMe
Hey, Dominique, we are just trembling in our boots at the consequences.
NOT!
9 posted on
03/17/2003 4:40:34 PM PST by
saluki_in_ohio
(Gun control is the ability to hit your target!)
To: Happy2BMe
Oh, just what are we going to discover the frogs have black-marketed to the butcher of Baghdad; Nukes? bios? chems? We will see when its over, huh.
To: Happy2BMe
Next up. France does the "we are still relevant" speech.
11 posted on
03/17/2003 4:41:38 PM PST by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Happy2BMe
I love the smell of panic in the morning.
To: Happy2BMe
"serious consequences"
So the French think the "serious cosequences" clause in 1441 was meant for the U.S.
Eff'ing Frogs.
To: Happy2BMe
"...was in clear violation of international opinion..."
So, now its the US, Britain, Austrailia, Spain, Portugal, Kuwait, Turkey, Poland, Israel, etc, etc, that are in clear violation of "international opinion". At what point is there a shift from "international opinion" to one of "Iraq, France, Russia, China opinion"?
15 posted on
03/17/2003 4:46:47 PM PST by
C210N
To: Happy2BMe
Shut the hell up already!!!!!! Good God...someone turn off the answering machine!! I'm sick of these cheese eating monkeys!!!!! I would love to send a fax that said "You're next! Love America"
18 posted on
03/17/2003 4:50:07 PM PST by
Shaka
To: Happy2BMe
such a conflict was in clear violation of international opinion What the @#$% does that mean? I didn't know international opinion was codified. Does that mean I can make a citizen's arrest if someone clearly violates Homer's opinion by playing Dixie Chicks in public?
To: Happy2BMe
22 posted on
03/17/2003 4:57:42 PM PST by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: Happy2BMe
A WORLD SERIES this early in the year?
23 posted on
03/17/2003 5:09:18 PM PST by
FryingPan101
(I love Rummy!)
To: Happy2BMe
Well, when the French say "serious conscequences" we know to take them seriously. /sarcasm
To: Happy2BMe
To: Happy2BMe
The statement in part reflected France's determination to defend itself against bitter U.S. and British criticism of the French threat to use its veto in the Security Council against any resolution that sought to authorize the use of force at this time. French commentators said Paris had been unjustly singled out. "I think it is a little bit unfair to blame France. France played a part, but I think the [U.S.] administration did not display an enormous amount of competence in ensuring support for its views," said Guillaume Parmentier, director of the French Center on the United States at the French Institute for International Relations.
He said the White House had been too quick to reject a recent compromise offered by Chile and had alienated many countries in the past by its opposition to the Kyoto environmental treaty and the International Criminal Court.
Unfairly singled out! LOL
So they admit their motives were impure all along, not from "principle".
28 posted on
03/17/2003 6:54:07 PM PST by
Iowegian
To: Happy2BMe
"SERIES World Consequences...WORLD SERIES Consequences"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson