Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Was A Human Shield In Iraq
Ryan Clancy

Posted on 03/17/2003 6:31:47 AM PST by Ryan C

Sen. Lindsey Graham recently called our actions as Human Shields "treasonous" and hopes to see us punished for more than the ten years in jail and $1 million in fines that the law currently allows for. He said that we were "giving aid and comfort to the enemy." I was not comforting the enemy – I was comforting the Iraqi people. The only aid that I provided was construction paper and crayons for children, and I did so fairly confident that they would not be used to make weapons of mass destruction.

Opposing this war is not treasonous. When I made the decision to go to Iraq, I did so in part because of concern for my country, and the planet. In calling for war, and forcing other countries to choose whether to be "with us or against us," we have thrown away a century of diplomacy. We are losing allies because of this issue in a time when we need them the most. In calling for war, I am terrified, as an American, that our country will again become the victim of terrorist acts or hostilities from other countries.

If we attack Iraq, we lose any moral high ground that we once had, and I am terrified of the consequences. If we set the precedent that countries can be justifiably attacked because we don't agree with them and they have weapons of mass destruction, I am afraid that we will become the next target. We have weapons of mass destruction, and there are many countries out there that don't agree with us.

Saddam Hussein is a terrible and unjust ruler, and the idea that any Human Shield supports him is completely untrue. I traveled to Iraq to support the Iraqi people, not the leader that happens to be in power there. I do not support Saddam, and it would be a great thing for the country and the world if he was not in power. Likewise, though, I do not support Bush, but I would oppose any foreign effort to remove our President from power. Our country cannot continue to install and remove regimes when it is politically expedient for us to do so.

As I set foot back in the United States, a passport control officer said to me "You went to Iraq? Are you nuts? All those people hate us!"

I didn't know where to begin.

As Americans, we seem unable to differentiate between other cultures and the governments of other cultures. We are not going to war with the Iraqi people, just Saddam, and yet we are contemplating sending thousands of missiles into Baghdad, killing a massive amount of civilians.

The Iraqi people do not seem to have the same conceptual problem. When I was in Baghdad, I was thanked by people in tears, and welcomed into the homes of the people there. Even the families ravaged by sanctions and poverty would share the little food that they had with me, even knowing that I was from a country whose stated aim is to bomb them back into the stone age. It was humbling and overwhelming, and I can't help thinking that, if the situations were reversed, that we might not be so kind.

I am proud to be an American, but terribly afraid of what my country is about to do to the people of Iraq.

I went to Baghdad not with the certainty that our presence there would stop a war, but knowing that there was little else I could do to try, and that the alternative was to sit at home and do nothing. I had to meet the people that my country was about to bomb, and to humanize them when and if I got back home.

When I was in Iraq, I visited several schools. In one high-school classroom, I asked the students to write letters to students in American classrooms. Marwa Quism, age 13, wrote "Dear American student... I hope there will be no war between us, and I hope we will be friends. Governments want war between us... we want peace. I like you, and we don't know why you don't like us..."

The people in Iraq may hate our foreign policy, and what the sanctions have done to their country, but they do not hate us.

In elementary classrooms, I asked the children to draw their homes and families. An eight-year-old drew his family, his home, and a missile in the sky, aimed at his house. There is no proper response when a child shows you a picture like that; I complimented the drawing, apologized for my country, and cried, later, for the first time in many years.

It is much more difficult for people to bomb abstract enemies than it is to bomb 13 year-old Marwa, who wants to be our friend. It does not look as if Bush will allow this war to be stopped. If I can facilitate communication between Marwa in Iraq and Bill in America, though, perhaps we can avert a war a generation from now. If I can play some small part in dispelling the myth that "they" hate "us", then this movement was not a failure.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: appeaser; eyewitness; firstperson; homeschoollist; humanshield; iraq; majortwit; usefulidiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
To: MadIvan
Help me out with the slang, Ivan. Is this guy a twit or a git?
41 posted on 03/17/2003 6:43:02 AM PST by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
So you, in your infinite compassion, would rather we stand by and allow those people to live in fear and poverty. You think it's OK that Saddam cuts out tounges, dips his people in acid vats, kills or imprisons them as he chooses, threatens their families. I see.

Gee, take your compassion somewhere else will you, decent people don't want to be around someone like you.

42 posted on 03/17/2003 6:43:17 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
"Blowing up Iraq is not going to endear the remaining 100 million muslims in the world to the U.S."

Only two (out of two) things inaccurate about dumbo's reasoning - nobody is going to "blow up Iraq", and there are a billion Muslims in the world, 900+ million of whom do not live in Iraq. This is a particularly telling example of liberal reasoning.

PETA, by the way, recently pointed out that since weasels are courageous, honorable little critters, it is slanderous to compare them with the French.
43 posted on 03/17/2003 6:43:31 AM PST by PETAMember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
I am terrified

Yes, we know.

44 posted on 03/17/2003 6:43:58 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TxBec
You said seeing that picture, you cried for the first time in many years. Didn't you cry when you saw pictures of those poor people jumping from WTC?

Good catch! I missed that.

45 posted on 03/17/2003 6:44:40 AM PST by Stultis (Do I really need sarcasm tags?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C

46 posted on 03/17/2003 6:44:56 AM PST by Bars4Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frozen section; Admin Moderator

Someone dropped his shield and made a mess. Clean-up in Aisle 34.

47 posted on 03/17/2003 6:45:01 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RippleFire
He is a panty shield!

48 posted on 03/17/2003 6:45:06 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (chIRAQ & sadDAM are bedfellows & clinton is a raping traitor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Focault's Pendulum
Funny how that happens.
49 posted on 03/17/2003 6:45:19 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
This idiot is nothing but a Maxi-Shield.
50 posted on 03/17/2003 6:45:33 AM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
I was not comforting the enemy – I was comforting the Iraqi people.

Obstructing war efforts is "aiding and abetting" and therefore comforting. A treasonous act. You wanna peacefully protest here, is one thing. What you and others are doing, as American citizens, is treasonous.

51 posted on 03/17/2003 6:45:35 AM PST by ThomasMore ([1 Pet 3:15-16])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
Do you know why Iraqi children are starving, in spite of billions of dollars in oil money flowing into the country?

a) Because the UN is holding on to half the money instead of using it for food and medicine.

b) Because Saddam is channeling all the supplies to his friends and starving his enemies, and the UN says it's up to Saddam to decide how to spend it.

c) Because Saddam is spending a large part of national income on weapons, which the French, Germans, Russians, and North Koreans are very kindly selling to him.
52 posted on 03/17/2003 6:45:42 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Focault's Pendulum
Was that a zot I heard?
53 posted on 03/17/2003 6:45:43 AM PST by ladtx ("...the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." D. MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Both. ;)

Regards, Ivan

54 posted on 03/17/2003 6:45:45 AM PST by MadIvan (Learn the power of the Dark Side, www.thedarkside.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
Sen. Lindsey Graham recently called our actions as Human Shields "treasonous" and hopes to see us punished for more than the ten years in jail and $1 million in fines that the law currently allows for. He said that we were "giving aid and comfort to the enemy."

With all due respect, Lindsey Graham is out to lunch on this one. American citizens who act as human shields are only considered "treasonous" because the United States has taken it upon itself to allow these people to impact our military's war plans.

Why not just let Mother Nature and Uncle Sam run their natural course? The first time a "human shield" comes back from Iraq in a coffee can will be the last time Lindsey Graham will ever need to concern himself with human shields in Iraq.

55 posted on 03/17/2003 6:46:00 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
"...even knowing that I was from a country whose stated aim is to bomb them back into the stone age."

The rhetoric, clumsy emotionalism and outright mendacity of this statement beggars the imagination. President Bush and our military leadership are going to extraordinary ends to protect civilians while removing a 21st Century Hitler. Never, never, never have you heard our leadership say anything approximating 'bomb them back into the stone age.'

The equation is simple. There will be less suffering and death through the removal of Saddam and his coterie of madmen than by leaving them in power.

Would you have traveled to Berlin in 1938 to express solidarity with the German people or would you have supported the removal of Hitler?

The spirit of Neville Chamberlain lives in the disastrously ill-informed efforts of those who have learned nothing from history.
56 posted on 03/17/2003 6:46:01 AM PST by esopman (Blessings on Freepers Everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: Ryan C
Why did you come back? Oh yeah, you're a coward.
58 posted on 03/17/2003 6:46:30 AM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, Zoolander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
"I was not comforting the enemy – I was comforting the Iraqi people. The only aid that I provided was construction paper and crayons for children, and I did so fairly confident that they would not be used to make weapons of mass destruction.

What YOU fail to understand about your actions is that you not only put yourself in danger, but you put other American's in danger for your selfish acts...and make no mistake about it, your act was selfish! By placing yourself in harms way (with or without crayons)you would have forced the allied forces to possibly have to alter an effective campaign to take out Saddam, not the people of Iraq.

This is your shortsigtedness and by acting in this treasonist way (Whether you understand it or not) you should have to abide by what the law of this land dictates....if you would have come back alive!

59 posted on 03/17/2003 6:46:52 AM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ryan C
"If we set the precedent that countries can be justifiably attacked because we don't agree with them and they have weapons of mass destruction, I am afraid that we will become the next target."

Is it a precedent to enforce a cease-fire agreement reached with a country you defeated in its war of agression? We didn't pick Iraq out of the blue.

60 posted on 03/17/2003 6:47:19 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson