We may not get a war after all..
1 posted on
03/12/2003 9:42:18 AM PST by
ewing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: ewing
One senior official has said that some parts of the Iraqi military already may have agreed not to fight. Perhaps the Iraqis are even closer to the French than previously imagined...
2 posted on
03/12/2003 9:43:57 AM PST by
ambrose
To: ewing
Of course, these stories may also be for Saddam's benefit... let him read this, hear of the rumors, then he goes into a paranoid rage and has his generals shot... putting the military in disarray in advance of the war.
4 posted on
03/12/2003 9:45:03 AM PST by
ambrose
To: ewing
Your link is verrrrrrrry interesting!!! :-)
5 posted on
03/12/2003 9:45:13 AM PST by
areafiftyone
(The U.N. is now officially irrelevant! The building is for Sale!!!)
To: ewing
An Air France jet filled with French military and several thousand white flags took off this morning bound for Bagdad..
6 posted on
03/12/2003 9:45:27 AM PST by
ken5050
To: ewing
This proves the French have been advising Iraq's military.
To: ewing
**that some parts of the Iraqi military already may have agreed not to fight.**
This will be interesting to follow.
8 posted on
03/12/2003 9:46:38 AM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: ewing
They were supposed to be secret and CNN shouted it to the whole world? I wonder how long these military leaders have before Saddam starts sending his goons after them.
To: ewing
I have long wondered (just in the back of my mind),if in fact, Pres. Bush was setting the left up so that he could later say, "They've surrendered. We've disarmed them and changed the regime without a drop of blood spilled. All it took was the U.S. standing firm in the face of U.N. pressure, the sheer POTENTIAL of war against the U.S. and the pressure of the U.S. military in their back yard. What the hell are you gonna complain about now?"
12 posted on
03/12/2003 9:47:55 AM PST by
hispanarepublicana
(successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
To: ewing
Tell me this wouldn't be justice . . . We walk into Baghdad unopposed to find Saddam and his henchmen hanging from that ugly-ass, crossing sword monument he built to himself. Then, we kick out all the Axis of Weasel companies, cancel all their contracts, and make all their citizens go live with Yasser Arafat.
Sweet. THAT would be sweet.
13 posted on
03/12/2003 9:49:13 AM PST by
geedee
To: ewing
Sheesh...why are they reporting this? I'm sure there is all sorts of psy-ops going on and having it broadcast on the news certainly doesn't help.
16 posted on
03/12/2003 9:50:40 AM PST by
Wphile
(I'M SO SICK OF THE IRAQ DEBATE!)
To: ewing
I wouldn't be surprised if among the first casualties of this war will be Saddam's political officers who are supposed to kill Iraqi soldiers who don't want to fight. If they're so emphatic that the Iraqi Army sacrifice for Saddam they may be given the opportunity to be first.
18 posted on
03/12/2003 9:51:05 AM PST by
mitchbert
(Facts are Stubborn Things)
To: ewing
"... We may not get a war after all.." That wouldn't break my heart.
What we want is to waltz in there and have the Iraqis yell 'Yippee!'.
To: ewing
We may not get a war after all..
So what... A victory by any means is still a victory.
Æ
22 posted on
03/12/2003 9:53:01 AM PST by
AgentEcho
(ERROR #1278: UNABLE TO INSERT WITTY TAGLINE.)
To: ewing
CNN is at it again with its awful headlines. At first glance it gives an impression like the U.S. is surrendering. I know it says then Iraq, but I wonder whether it is worded this way to grab attention.
25 posted on
03/12/2003 9:53:45 AM PST by
Cap Huff
To: ewing
If we don't get a war in Iraq, then the Turkish refusal of a northern front and our response ought to be put to good use anyway. Let's REALLY secure the southern flank and have some vengeance for 9/11.
28 posted on
03/12/2003 9:55:52 AM PST by
steveegg
(Clinton and Blair didn't get UN authorization to launch Operation Desert (Kill Impeachment) Fox)
To: ewing; hchutch
This may be the US using the Heydrich-Tukhachecvskiy play.
34 posted on
03/12/2003 10:00:15 AM PST by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: ewing
Secret no more!
To: ewing
The way things are going, it may as well be our surrender.
To: ewing
I would think there'd have to be special conditions for accepting surrenders in this war.... due to the fact that these people could infect themselves with a biological weapon, ie...ebola, smallpox, etc... before surrendering in the midst of our troops.
To: ewing; Squantos
PSYOPS, if effective, will be the biggest winner in this war.
I hope the psyops boys can convince to Iraqi military leaders to watch the war on the satellite dish and not get involved.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson