Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Senior) Officials: U.S. Talking Surrender With Iraqi Military Personnel
CNN.com ^ | March 12, 2003 11:46 AM | CNN Correspondant John King from the White House

Posted on 03/12/2003 9:42:18 AM PST by ewing

Officials: United States talking surrender with Iraqi Military Personnel

Surrender Talks

United States officials said Wednesday that surrender negotiations have secretly begun with key Iraqi military officials in hopes that some military units will not fight United States and coalition forces if there is war.

The Pentagon is not handling these communications, officials said, but instead other elements of the United State government are handling them.

One senior official has said that some parts of the Iraqi military already may have agreed not to fight.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqsurrendertalk; secretsurrender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
We may not get a war after all..
1 posted on 03/12/2003 9:42:18 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ewing
One senior official has said that some parts of the Iraqi military already may have agreed not to fight.

Perhaps the Iraqis are even closer to the French than previously imagined...

2 posted on 03/12/2003 9:43:57 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Time to practice those white flag rifle lifts!
3 posted on 03/12/2003 9:44:45 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Of course, these stories may also be for Saddam's benefit... let him read this, hear of the rumors, then he goes into a paranoid rage and has his generals shot... putting the military in disarray in advance of the war.
4 posted on 03/12/2003 9:45:03 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Your link is verrrrrrrry interesting!!! :-)
5 posted on 03/12/2003 9:45:13 AM PST by areafiftyone (The U.N. is now officially irrelevant! The building is for Sale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
An Air France jet filled with French military and several thousand white flags took off this morning bound for Bagdad..
6 posted on 03/12/2003 9:45:27 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
This proves the French have been advising Iraq's military.
7 posted on 03/12/2003 9:45:28 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
**that some parts of the Iraqi military already may have agreed not to fight.**

This will be interesting to follow.
8 posted on 03/12/2003 9:46:38 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
perhaps the Iraqis are more tired of saddam, than we know. They are saying, surrendering to the Americans is better than fighting for someone they hate! Most of them will welcome Americans.
9 posted on 03/12/2003 9:47:04 AM PST by ncooper777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ewing
They were supposed to be secret and CNN shouted it to the whole world? I wonder how long these military leaders have before Saddam starts sending his goons after them.
10 posted on 03/12/2003 9:47:13 AM PST by Democratic_Machiavelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Possibly. Seems to be a win-win situation except for perhaps, letting the French weasle out of their potential treason at the UN and letting the UN think it was all their doing and came about because of the likes of Hans Blix and his "inspections".

Prairie
11 posted on 03/12/2003 9:47:32 AM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ewing
I have long wondered (just in the back of my mind),if in fact, Pres. Bush was setting the left up so that he could later say, "They've surrendered. We've disarmed them and changed the regime without a drop of blood spilled. All it took was the U.S. standing firm in the face of U.N. pressure, the sheer POTENTIAL of war against the U.S. and the pressure of the U.S. military in their back yard. What the hell are you gonna complain about now?"
12 posted on 03/12/2003 9:47:55 AM PST by hispanarepublicana (successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Tell me this wouldn't be justice . . . We walk into Baghdad unopposed to find Saddam and his henchmen hanging from that ugly-ass, crossing sword monument he built to himself. Then, we kick out all the Axis of Weasel companies, cancel all their contracts, and make all their citizens go live with Yasser Arafat.

Sweet. THAT would be sweet.

13 posted on 03/12/2003 9:49:13 AM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Perhaps the Iraqis are even closer to the French than previously imagined...

But in this case, it will be an honorable surrender. From the standpoint of an Iraqi, anything that can be done to remove Saddam from power should be considered as an act of patriotism (if such a term can be applied to the Iraqis).

14 posted on 03/12/2003 9:49:55 AM PST by SamAdams76 (California wine tastes better - boycott French wine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I'd go for that as well! Psy-ops is a wonderful thing..
15 posted on 03/12/2003 9:50:06 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Sheesh...why are they reporting this? I'm sure there is all sorts of psy-ops going on and having it broadcast on the news certainly doesn't help.
16 posted on 03/12/2003 9:50:40 AM PST by Wphile (I'M SO SICK OF THE IRAQ DEBATE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratic_Machiavelli
They were supposed to be secret and CNN shouted it to the whole world?

Why not? CNN isn't on the side of good. This is a war between good and evil, CNN chose their side long ago.

17 posted on 03/12/2003 9:50:47 AM PST by Balding_Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ewing
I wouldn't be surprised if among the first casualties of this war will be Saddam's political officers who are supposed to kill Iraqi soldiers who don't want to fight. If they're so emphatic that the Iraqi Army sacrifice for Saddam they may be given the opportunity to be first.
18 posted on 03/12/2003 9:51:05 AM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
"... We may not get a war after all.."

That wouldn't break my heart.

What we want is to waltz in there and have the Iraqis yell 'Yippee!'.

19 posted on 03/12/2003 9:51:17 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
Sounds like a Rovian move straight out of the playbook!
20 posted on 03/12/2003 9:51:33 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson