Replies

"That's an interesting opinion, but no one in authority in any of the past 200 years seems to agree with you, and considering the numerous disagreements among federal judges over the years, that's saying something."

You know you're debating a liberal when your opponent pretends to be omniscient. Hell, if you'd just read the article you'd see that there were justices who wouldn't let Roosevelt do what he wanted (thus agreeing with me), but I guess it's just easier for you to claim to know what is in the heart and mind of every justice ever appointed.

Besides, if precedent made right then slavery would be right.

"Frankly, the more reasonable answer is *not* that you are sane and the rest of the world is crazy, but that you are the one in error here..."

No, the reasonable answer is that you're full of it and you're trying to throw up a smokescreen to obfuscate the debate.

"Besides, if precedent made right then slavery would be right."

And there's yet another blow to your argument, as Slavery *was* legal, and took a Constitutional amendment to become abolished...