[Sofa King]

"That's utter rubbish. I've given nothing up, but rather simply asked you to substantiate some *authority*, in fact *any* authority, in the last 200+ years (for your claim as to your own unique interpretation of our Constitution that seems to leave whole parts of that document out due to your inferred redundancy)."

Are you retarded or something? I just got finished telling you that federal judges AREN'T_DOING_THIER_JOB. ie, what their rulings say and what they SHOULD say don't match up. THAT'S the problem. Also, I'm not leaving out a thing. You're the one pretending that Article 1 section 8 clauses 2-18 don't exist.

[Southack]

"I just got finished telling you that federal judges AREN'T_DOING_THIER_JOB. ie, what their rulings say and what they SHOULD say don't match up. THAT'S the problem."

That's an interesting opinion, but no one in authority in any of the past 200 years seems to agree with you, and considering the numerous disagreements among federal judges over the years, that's saying something.

Frankly, the more reasonable answer is *not* that you are sane and the rest of the world is crazy, but that you are the one in error here...