Skip to comments.
Partial Birth Abortion-live thread at senate
www.cspan.org ^
| 3/10/03
| VRWC_minion
Posted on 03/10/2003 4:16:02 PM PST by VRWC_minion
I was surprised to see debate occuring on senate floor regarding partial birth abortion.
TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; pbaban2003
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-189 next last
To: TLBSHOW
I believe that. Didn't want to say it yet though. This is a very weird setup with the dems right now. I hope their conscious is still in tact as far as this procedure on the unborn.
61
posted on
03/10/2003 5:30:10 PM PST
by
swheats
To: TLBSHOW
"As for PB Abortion from my sources this will pass and be signed before Easter."I sure hope you're right. It's been much too long in coming. Could Cheney help with the vote on this?
To: TLBSHOW
Look whos going to be at the Senate tomorrow! Vice President Cheney
All the work behind the scenes looks to be working!
63
posted on
03/10/2003 5:35:52 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Grand Old Partisan
Look whos going to be at the Senate tomorrow! Vice President Cheney
All the work behind the scenes looks to be working!
64
posted on
03/10/2003 5:36:09 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: the Deejay
IMO, Cheny's help is not required for PBA ban. The issue IS on the public mind, contrary to DEM objections (and in contrast to Estrada nomination which the public is ignorant of). Pure public/political pressure is in favor of PBA getting passed.
I can't believe it is even debated. I want to kick the female Senators who defend the killing of near-born, innocent humans.
65
posted on
03/10/2003 5:39:09 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Cboldt
The female senators will answer to God one day. Only wish we could all hear it. However, only (they alone) with God will.
To: TLBSHOW
That's terrific! I wish they had done more of the prep work I had recommended, but this is still wonderful.
Should I take a bow?
To: the Deejay
The male ones will answer too.
68
posted on
03/10/2003 5:45:24 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Grand Old Partisan
By all means, after Cheney demands the vote and it is (more or less) immediately taken, per your suggestion.
69
posted on
03/10/2003 5:46:17 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Grand Old Partisan
bttt....
I hope he slams the democrats but good with the facts!
70
posted on
03/10/2003 5:47:00 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: the Deejay
71
posted on
03/10/2003 5:54:18 PM PST
by
mdittmar
To: Cboldt
Yes, the male ones will answer, too. That's a given. Can't just ONE democrap *think* about that aspect, in the hereafter, for one second and have a change of heart?
To: the Deejay
Don't you think an evil piece of trash like Boxer would get EXCITED about the chance to see babies killed?
I honestly believe it would thrill her to watch the procedure. The woman is heartless, bloodless and pure evil - well, not PURE evil, because then she would be named Hillary.
73
posted on
03/10/2003 5:58:35 PM PST
by
GilesB
To: the Deejay
I proudly admit to being profoundly influenced by my (christian) religious beliefs, but it doesn't take religion to see the wrong in killing near-born, innocent babies.
74
posted on
03/10/2003 5:58:52 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: PatrickHenry
Roe v. Wade was bad law. They should have left it to the states.I agree. So do Justices Scalia and Thomas.
Unfortunately, there are five current Justices who seem prepared to go to whatever lengths are necessary to strike down any restrictions whatsoever on abortion. 30 states have attempted to ban partial birth abortion, to no avail. I suspect that if this bill passes, the SCOTUS will find a way to declare it unconstitutional too.
To: GilesB
You're absolutely right about Boxer. She's really a bloodthirsty b**** alright. (Can't stand to look at her or listen to her.)
To: PatrickHenry
But could someone please tell me what provision of the US Constitution gives Congress any authority over this issue? This is the trouble with pretending -- as do many libertarians, unfortunately -- that everything's a matter of "Privacy" or "Free Speech".
The mother-only right to homicide is as justifiably a matter of "privacy" as the special protection of for-profit faked-Cyber childporn is a matter of "Free Speech".
77
posted on
03/10/2003 6:02:34 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: TLBSHOW
God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers Could you parse this for me?
Thanks in advance.
78
posted on
03/10/2003 6:03:51 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: VRWC_minion
Boxer is amazed there is no womens health exception. "Health" is the key word. A woman's "health" is a waxen nose that can be shaped to mean just about anything. Notice that they do not say, "woman's life exception," which would be quite a different matter.
To: PatrickHenry
But could someone please tell me what provision of the US Constitution gives Congress any authority over this issue? The SC changed that
80
posted on
03/10/2003 6:04:55 PM PST
by
VRWC_minion
( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson