Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. May Require Fingerprinting and Study of Rocket Hobbyists
The NY Times ^ | March 9, 2003 | THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 03/09/2003 12:46:59 PM PST by Pharmboy

WASHINGTON, March 8 (AP) — Hobbyists who build and launch high-powered model rockets could soon be subject to background checks, fingerprinting and storage inspections.

Under new provisions set to go into effect May 24 under the Homeland Security Act, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives would place further restrictions on the fuel that powers the rockets.

Sport rocketry attracts thousands of hobbyists across the country. The rockets can stand taller than an adult, soar miles into the sky and are designed to land intact nearby.

The new rules will require buyers of the rocket fuel ammonium perchlorate composite propellant to submit their fingerprints and photographs to the bureau. The government will check applicants' backgrounds to see if they are among those banned from possessing explosives, felons, for example.

Under the proposed rules, the government will also inspect the areas where permit holders store explosives at least once every three years.

"You can't even estimate the devastating effect this is going to have on the hobby," said Bruce Kelly, the publisher of the magazine High Power Rocketry, said of the rule changes.

Hobbyists have won the support of Senator Michael B. Enzi, Republican of Wyoming, who is drafting legislation to free rocketeers from the rules. His spokesman dismissed government claims that the regulations would better track explosives while not being "overly burdensome."

Meanwhile hobbyists are mounting a public relations assault on the new regulations. The Web site of the Amateur Rocketry Society of America, posts daily updates on the hobby's dispute with "the feds." This week it gave a plan of action.

"Senator Enzi has requested that you fax your letter and phone your two senators to enlist their support for this important legislation," the posting said of a measure exempting rocketry from the Safe Explosives Act. "If you have not done so yet, please do it this week."

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives says the most common model-rocket motors, which are smaller and typically use a weaker fuel, do not require permits and will not be affected.

"The Safe Explosives Act has not, does not and will not affect that exemption," said Gail Davis, chief of the bureau's public safety branch.

But hobbyists fear that restrictions on how explosive material can be shipped will hamper businesses that make and sell rocket motors.

Curtailed shipping could lead to a de facto ban on motor sales, said Gregory Lyzenga, a rocket enthusiast and geophysics researcher at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

"It's not as though there's been a law passed saying `model rocketry is illegal,' but it's just that the materials are unavailable," Mr. Lyzenga said.

Rocketeers are suing the bureau in federal court in Washington to force it to change its classification of ammonium perchlorate composite propellant as an explosive. They say it burns and does not blow up.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; billofrights; fingerprints; gummint; hobbyists; rocketry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
They say it burns and does not blow up.

But can it carry a payload?

1 posted on 03/09/2003 12:46:59 PM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I guess I'll have to show some ID when I buy those Estes rockets for the kids, now.
2 posted on 03/09/2003 12:52:14 PM PST by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The regulations they describe don't seem burdensome.
3 posted on 03/09/2003 12:56:49 PM PST by 7 x 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Another nibble out of the apple of freedom.
4 posted on 03/09/2003 12:57:01 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
We don't need no steenking freedom.

ANTI-TERROR ÜBER ALLES

The mythical "freedom versus security" tradeoff is a false choice.

The 911 attacks did not occur because Americans have too much freedom.

They occurred because terrorists were able to gain access to the cockpits of hijacked aircraft.

Instead of equipping all commercial aircraft with doors which could actually be used to keep hijackers out of cockpits, Washington created an Orwellian monster named the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and hired tens of thousands of minimum-wage Gestapo to root through the underwear of airline passengers and arrest/prosecute those who object.

Simply setting foot in an airport is now considered to be a terrorist act.

The fact that the TSA created a national airport police force without ever addressing the cockpit-door scandal is damning evidence that their mandate has nothing to do with protecting anyone. 

The true mission of the TSA is to turn America into a police state.

Airports are the incubators. 

The statists want to condition us to accept the idea that probable cause is dead and they can search our houses, our hard drives and our persons and demand to see our papers at any time. 

Boycott the airline industry and its airport/POW camps now, or live in a national POW camp later.


5 posted on 03/09/2003 12:59:17 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7 x 77
The regulations they describe don't seem burdensome.

Neither was the income tax when it first got started. The burdensome part comes once they have people conditioned to the idea.

6 posted on 03/09/2003 1:02:36 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 7 x 77
The regulations they describe don't seem burdensome.

Ever had the ATF "visit" your house?

7 posted on 03/09/2003 1:08:04 PM PST by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thanks! Great post!
8 posted on 03/09/2003 1:12:08 PM PST by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Ever had the ATF "visit" your house?

No, but maybe they should be visiting suspicious people with explosives.

9 posted on 03/09/2003 1:12:45 PM PST by 7 x 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
40+years ago, before the model stuff, we called them amatuer rockets. didn't have access to things like composite amonium perchlorate propellants then. We usually used a mixture of sulphur and zinc dust. Nasty stuff to make mistakes with, but it really made them fly. I suspect it was some of us that went on to put a man on the moon. Sad to see those days passing into history.

America, the land of the free and home of the brave.

10 posted on 03/09/2003 1:15:43 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7 x 77
The regulations they describe don't seem burdensome.

No more so than background checks and licensing, along with home inspections, for firearms and all other things dangerous when misused.

11 posted on 03/09/2003 1:18:20 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: *BillOfRights; *bang_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
12 posted on 03/09/2003 1:19:39 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Sport rocketry attracts thousands of hobbyists across the country. The rockets can stand taller than an adult, soar miles into the sky and are designed to land intact nearby.

Unfortunately, the possibilities are endless! Model rockets, radio controlled airplanes, boats & cars (hey, they can readily become "guided weapons"). What about the millions of propane tanks (remember Columbine..., they just weren't sharp enough to perfect detonators).

The above are only toys..., what about trucks, RVs, large trailers, boats, etc.?

"Your Toys Are Dangerous and MUST BE CONFISCATED"! What BS!!!

13 posted on 03/09/2003 1:20:26 PM PST by ExSES
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSES
No kidding! Everyone here should watch "October Sky" A great movie about Homer Hickum (future NASA engineer) and his efforts to build a rocket.

14 posted on 03/09/2003 1:23:39 PM PST by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 7 x 77
It's reassuring to see that there's still people who are willing to trade their freedoms for (temporary) security. (/sarcasm)
15 posted on 03/09/2003 1:25:57 PM PST by El Conservador ("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ExSES
The captured al qaeda hairy guy had plans for hijacking oil trucks and crashing them into targets. Scary stuff...we must remain vigilant.
16 posted on 03/09/2003 1:26:30 PM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
They can carry a payload, but not explosives, pyrotechnics, vertebrate animals and such. Usually the payload is a camera, altimeter or something similar. The rockets cannot be actively guided, as they then become a missile.

The hobby is already heavily regulated.

The finger printing, etc. is overkill. To get into the high end of the hobby, you need, usually, a BATF permit (Low Explosives User Permit,) that requires significant background checks, an interview, approved storage facility.

If you value your second amendment rights, you may want to support the rocket hobby. Each "trimming" of your rights is a step to their elimination. Browse over to http://www.tripoli.org for more info.
17 posted on 03/09/2003 1:26:43 PM PST by LiberationIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSES
"Your Toys Are Dangerous and MUST BE CONFISCATED"! What BS!!!

Here's the disturbing part:

Hobbies like these are what make tomorrow's engineers and today's engineers better. We didn't land on the moon first without creating the environment where the truly curious and devoted could invest all of themselves in their vocations and avocations.

More unintended consequences of the paranoid looking for the evil in us all.

18 posted on 03/09/2003 1:27:15 PM PST by Glenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LiberationIT
As a Freeper, I am, of course, a major Second Amendment supporter: lifetime NRA since 1975. Your point is a good one and I did visit the tripoli website.
19 posted on 03/09/2003 1:32:58 PM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
If you haven't seen it, may I recommend October Sky for family viewing. Get it at your video store. It is a true story, taken from the book, "Rocket Boys," written by a NASA engineer about his introduction to rocket science as a high schooler in West Virginia. It will warm your heart.


20 posted on 03/09/2003 1:33:14 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson