Here's a nice picture to send to tree huggers when you want to ruin their day.
Posted on 03/08/2003 3:36:54 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Forest Plan Involves Timber Co. Contracts
Sat Mar 8, 8:53 AM ET
By MATTHEW DALY, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON -
The Bush administration is confident it has found a novel, inexpensive way to clear overgrown forests and prevent catastrophic wildfires. Critics say it's a blatant giveaway to timber companies.
The plan, approved last month as part of a giant spending bill, allows logging companies to cut large, commercially valuable trees in national forests in exchange for clearing smaller, more fire-prone trees and brush.
Known as "stewardship contracting," the approach allows the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (news - web sites) to issue 10-year contracts to private contractors for clearance work with no limits on the size of trees to be cut or the number of acres cleared.
By allowing long-term contracts, the program gives companies incentive to invest needed equipment while saving the government much of the cost of wildfire prevention — in effect paying them with trees, said Agriculture Undersecretary Mark Rey, the plan's chief architect.
Critics say that timber companies are unlikely stewards and say the administration is turning over huge swaths of national forests to an industry that supported President Bush (news - web sites) in 2000.
"The bottom line: It's a license to steal," said Marty Hayden, legislative director for Earthjustice, an environmental advocacy group.
As a practical matter, timber companies are not going to clear worthless forest underbrush at a commercial loss, Hayden and other critics say.
"To pay for it, you need big trees, in areas that are not close to communities," Hayden said. "These are older trees, deep in the forest, that are exactly what we do not need to be thinning."
Compounding environmentalists' outrage is the rapid-fire way in which majority Republicans pushed the measure through the House and Senate as a part of a $397 billion spending plan approved by Congress and signed by Bush.
The 3,000-page bill, which pays for the current budget year's operations for nearly all agencies that are not related to defense, was approved with minimal debate amid complaints by lawmakers in both parties that they did not know what they were voting on.
"This is the subversion of democracy," said Michael Francis of the Wilderness Society. "They're ignoring science and just saying, `We're in charge now.'"
The Bush administration and the timber industry say stewardship contracts are the right remedy for the 190 million acres of public land considered at high risk of wildfires.
Rey, who oversees the Forest Service, said apprehension about stewardship contracts is misplaced.
"There's nothing new or sinister or unknown to the body politic here," he said, noting that 84 stewardship contracts have been allowed in national forests on a pilot basis since 1999.
"Our judgment is we know they are working," said Rey, the administration's foremost advocate for stewardship contracts.
Rey cited a study by the Pinchot Institute for Conservation, a Washington-based nonprofit group that has studied the pilot program for the Forest Service. In a preliminary report in December, the group said the projects continue to mature and "hold the potential to become a primary tool for facilitating resource management activities on federal lands."
But the report warns that of 84 projects, 79 either haven't started, or are still under way. "Congress is advised to exercise serious caution" before making stewardship contracts permanent, the report said.
Even without complete data, officials know enough to move forward now, Rey said.
Rey dismissed concerns of some environmentalists that the plan could allow unlimited logging, saying traditional timber sales remain the best and most cost-effective way to log large areas of public lands.
Far from a giveaway to timber giants such as Weyerhaeuser or Boise Cascade, Rey said the first bidders are likely to be small, rural businesses and even nonprofits.
___
On the Net: Forest Service: http://www.fs.fed.us/
Pinchot Institute: http://www.pinchot.org/
In response to this enviro-extremist I say that the enviromental groups are even more unlikely stewards of our nation's resources given their record of encouraging hundreds of thousands of acres of forest to become choked with undergrowth until a catastrophic fire burns every living thing to death on a regular basis.
The wildlife, the natural resources, and the economies of small-town America have been laid waste by just this sort of stupidity. I'm glad we finally have an adult in the White House again!
Here's a nice picture to send to tree huggers when you want to ruin their day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.