Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Germany Will Not Aid US Soldiers In Chemical, Biological Attack
CNSNews.com ^ | 3/07/03 | R. Raghavendra

Posted on 03/07/2003 9:53:35 AM PST by kattracks

Berlin (CNSNews.com) - Adding another sticking point to strained relations with the United States, Germany says its troops will not come to the rescue of American soldiers if they invade Iraq and face a chemical or biological attack there.

German defense minister Peter Struck said Friday that his forces will only defend and assist American soldiers and civilians based in Kuwait, where some German troops are currently stationed.

German soldiers in Kuwait possess equipment to detect contamination by biological and chemical weapons. But if the attack takes place in Iraq, German troops will not go forward to assist U.S. soldiers or their allies.

"Our soldiers will remain in Kuwait because the defense agreement applies to the citizens and American troops stationed in that country," Struck said in an interview with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung. "The protection of American soldiers advancing in Iraqi territory must be taken on by the Americans themselves."

Germany has stood firm in its view that there should be no war. Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder reiterated this stance Thursday when he said that the United Nations and the international community should discuss ways to achieve a peaceful solution. On Friday, Germany's foreign minister told the U.N. Security Council that there are "efficienct alternatives to war in Iraq."

After a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, the German Chancellor said that Germany, France and Russia agreed that there was no need for a second resolution.

"The cooperation of Iraq has got better, but it still needs further improvement," Schroeder said. "Germany's basic position will remain intact, and it is a very, very firm position."

The German government has also announced that it would not help finance the rebuilding of Iraq if America invades. In 1991, Germany did not play an active military role in the first Gulf War, but it shared a large portion of the financial burden.

Last week, Berlin turned a request by NATO for additional Patriot air defense missiles for Turkey. The German government said that it had already fulfilled its obligation to NATO.

At the same time, however, Germany is prepared to increase the strength of its troops in Kuwait. The defense minister said that he would send additional troops to Iraq's neighbor to maintain security if the U.S. presence at Camp Doha is reduced because of war.

Last week, Germany said that it would send some 30 additional soldiers to join the elite troops operating the Fuchs - vehicles specially fitted with advanced equipment for detecting chemical, biological or nuclear contamination. The vehicles are stationed about 60 miles from the Iraqi border.

The German parliament has authorized the deployment of 800 elite troops in the region.

But the opposition Christian Democratic Union criticized the defense minister for his position on assistance to U.S. troops.

Friedbert Pflueger, the CDU foreign policy spokesman, described the move as "dangerous and unwise."

"I can't imagine that a German defense minister would deny emergency help for attacked American soldiers in Iraq only kilometers from where the Fuchs are stationed," Pflueger said.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

 



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Germany; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: biologicalattacks; biologicalwarfare; biologicalweapons; boycott; boycottgermany; chemicalattacks; chemicalwarfare; chemicalweapons; cowards; gaschambers; german; germanhistory; germany; gulfwarii; iraq; mustardgas; selfish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241 next last
To: vbmoneyspender
I have no problems to criticize anybody. Keeping the lectures America told my nation after the war in mind, I´m just doing what Byrnes wanted us to do: expressing our opinion in a free society.

I was born in 1981. I am innocent, I never committed a crime. I take and use my right to say what I think.

But to make you sleeping well: when I wrote "difference between murder and murder" I thought of Holocaust and Pearl Harbour, not of Hiroshima (and hadn´t posted it then). After that I realized that Hiroshima was meant and I thought about it and came to the conclusion that the use of the nukes were wrong. At least in Nagasaki.
141 posted on 03/07/2003 2:49:33 PM PST by Michael81Dus (http://mitglied.lycos.de/p0wer/Download/time.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
No,

Germany the worlds 3rd biggest economy with 81,000,000 people spends on defense no more than GB with 56,000,000. Even during the ENTIRE cold war. THEY NEVER CARRIED THIER OWN WEIGHT. Spending no more than 3.2-3.3% GDP on defense at the peak (US 6%). Today they spend 1.2% the US 3.2% (roughly) GDP on defense. It is questionable if they are even CAPABLE of upholding their NATO commitment. The Bundeswehr is a bleed out hollow force with NO force projection capabilities. In reality, all we ask of them is a token commitment to show unity. They have something like 30 soldiers in Kuwait. The US upwards of 100,000 (in Kuwait). But asking to serve in the capacity of a Combat Support elements with a whopping 30 guys is a lot asked.

AWACS? I hope this is no NATO asset to which ALL NATO countries contribute. To support your case. The Germans have forces in Afghanistan too. But they came after the US did the dirty work. Their limited to ISAF, don’t really hunt the enemy, and are very limited in numbers. We almost had to twist their arm off for them to pick up the role as leading nation after the Turks. I see what your saying, but their contribution is marginal at best, especially when considering how big they are. Just as our military, their soldiers are not at fault. In fact, many off line will readily tell of their contempt for their current administration. This does not change the fact though that Germany is waffling, playing with polemics in the UN and the interpretation of 1441. It does not change the fact that Germany is willingly sabotaging every US political move in order to prevent a second resolution so much needed by Blair. It does not change the fact that they are playing with the lives of US service members! Something we take serious in our country.

Can you read German? Maybe you should read “Spiegel, Stern, Focus” or just watch some German TV. Your worry and care of them seems a little out of place. They have been bashing us a long time. Just go into some of their chat rooms and see what they write. In one day I can tally up a good 10 times where either in print, TV (even public ARD/ZDF), or radio (HR3) they go off about us and oil, poor Iraqi children and our embargo, all the birth defects and our use of DU ammunition, and and and (but always consistently anti war, anti embargo, and yes anti-American). This is not some shmuck posting shit. No these are state owned TV and radio stations. These are the stations that ran “Der Marathon Man” basically telling what a hero Joschka Fisher is. Coincidentally this came out after the Balkan crisis and it showed how a compassionate guy like him, who really did not want war, just had to push for armed intervention. The Germans are a sick society and it is good that Americans finally see them for what they are. Anti-Americanism is nothing new in Germany. It’s been around for decades and it is GOOD that the people of America see what they are, what they believe in, who they support. It is GOOD that they have to live by their words and are held accountable for their actions.
142 posted on 03/07/2003 2:50:19 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Should read: stationed in Kuwait.
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
143 posted on 03/07/2003 2:50:53 PM PST by Kay Soze (F - France and Germany - They are my Nation's and my Family's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
"The German government can go to Hell."

Agreed. The US have overflight rights and bases in Germany, right? Why can´t you repeat "Chinese embassy" over the Chancellors office in Berlin??

;-)
144 posted on 03/07/2003 2:51:10 PM PST by Michael81Dus (http://mitglied.lycos.de/p0wer/Download/time.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: DC native
They are your enemy fire when ready!!!!
145 posted on 03/07/2003 2:51:38 PM PST by Kay Soze (F - France and Germany - They are my Nation's and my Family's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Red6
It is wrong to say that Germans didn´t fight in Afghanistan. Special forces were engaged in the fightings in the hills with US and British special forces, too. The last left in early March.

"All the work" isn´t done in Afghanistan... the problem is resurrecting.
146 posted on 03/07/2003 2:53:57 PM PST by Michael81Dus (http://mitglied.lycos.de/p0wer/Download/time.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
We have freedom of speech in this country, unlike yours. How dare you tell me not to post on this board? Create a board in your own country, this is, after all an American sponsored site. I don't need lectures from a 22 year old snot nosed German who still thinks that you come from a Master race, superior to anyone else. Grow up and then join the discussions. Your tone simply suggests that your feelings of superiority have not waned. You should be a Belgian, Waffling to them comes naturally.
147 posted on 03/07/2003 2:55:38 PM PST by americanbychoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: americanbychoice
He cannot create a board in Germany as there is nothing of interest that the children of the Nazis can legally discuss.

Their only interest is now illegal to practice.
148 posted on 03/07/2003 2:58:22 PM PST by Kay Soze (F - France and Germany - They are my Nation's and my Family's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: americanbychoice
You´re insulting and offending not only my nation but me personally whole the time. I dare to tell you not to respond to my posts on the board so I will do with your posts. That was my proposal in my freepmail to you, and I thought you understand that.
149 posted on 03/07/2003 2:58:42 PM PST by Michael81Dus (http://mitglied.lycos.de/p0wer/Download/time.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
Krautiot: I saw what insults you wrote in a freepmail. I decided to let it go unanswered since it seemed beneath me. Looking at your idiotic ranting I will counter you every time I see an idiotic statement from you. Whenever you say something right ( in the early days of your presence here you did) I will also aknowledge it. Don't you dare tell me what to do or write, just like I put up with your crap without telling you to stop it. It would just be Un-American.
150 posted on 03/07/2003 3:03:35 PM PST by americanbychoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: americanbychoice
Most Germans feel morally and intellectually superior to any race. Anti semitism and suspicion toward anything non- German is still rampant.

You have got to be kidding, right?

151 posted on 03/07/2003 3:04:02 PM PST by SwordofTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth
no
152 posted on 03/07/2003 3:04:31 PM PST by americanbychoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: americanbychoice
Un-American?? Uhm... in fact it was the proposal of a friendly Freeper who advised me to tell you that - to avoid more hatred and irrational posts.

"Krautiot"?? That´s how you call people who think your hate messages are inappropriate and offending?
Great tolerance! You seem to have learned nothing in these 42 years you´re now living in the land of the free. And you´ve forgotten everything your parents told you here.

153 posted on 03/07/2003 3:07:59 PM PST by Michael81Dus (http://mitglied.lycos.de/p0wer/Download/time.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth
He is ranting and blind in his hatred. I call it disappointed hope.
154 posted on 03/07/2003 3:08:53 PM PST by Michael81Dus (http://mitglied.lycos.de/p0wer/Download/time.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
You are not merely offending us with words but equipping my enemy with arms to KILL my fellow countrymen.

Your ‘re nation is now saying its willing to violate international agreements to lend aid to wounded soldiers.

If you E mail me I will turn it over to the Feds and Anti defamation league!
155 posted on 03/07/2003 3:09:57 PM PST by Kay Soze (F - France and Germany - They are my Nation's and my Family's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
First of all, it is not Germany violating international agreements. The article says that the troops won´t move to Iraq, but stay in Kuwait. Of course they will help wounded soldiers or citizen in Kuwait if possible. Germam Defense Minister Struck offered German Medevac airplanes to the US forces in case of war some weeks ago.

Please provide proofs that the German government approved the weapon sells to Iraq after 1991.
156 posted on 03/07/2003 3:14:09 PM PST by Michael81Dus (http://mitglied.lycos.de/p0wer/Download/time.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
"Starting today, take one or two German products to the front checkout counter with your other stuff; then, in front of and within ear shot of other shoppers, say "oh my. Hey, this one's MADE IN GERMANY. We don't want it".

Just leave it there for the restock bin."


Beautiful. I'm there. I think I'll walk up to the register with all the Bayer aspirin from one shelf and then say, "whoops, Bayer is a German company" and walk out the door.
157 posted on 03/07/2003 3:18:20 PM PST by Beck_isright (going to war without the French is like duck hunting without an accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
"The costs for Marshall plan were much lower than the money the US budget received in 1991. "

You forgot the A.P.R. of 1.75 % since 1947. File the bill. Sign the law. Then freeze all German and French assets in the US until the bill is paid. Including the holdings of Daimler-Chrysler. That should motivate the mini-Nazis to think twice about who protects this world and who's in charge. If they want to join the Commie-Ruskie-Chicom sphere, go for it.
158 posted on 03/07/2003 3:20:56 PM PST by Beck_isright (going to war without the French is like duck hunting without an accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
Germany's leading role in arming Iraq
By Marc Erikson
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EB05Ak02.html

Expurgated portions of Iraq's December 7 report to the UN Security Council show that German firms made up the bulk of suppliers for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. What's galling is that German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and his minions have long known the facts, German intelligence services know them and have loads of information on what Saddam Hussein is hiding, and Schroeder nonetheless plays holier than thou to an easily manipulated, pacifist-inclined domestic audience.

If it's not the height of hypocrisy and opportunism, Schroeder's preemptive "no war. period" stance on Iraq and insistence on a "German Way" (Deutscher Weg) certainly come close. German Way? Haven't we heard that sort of talk before sometime, somewhere? But leave that be. It falls in the same category as Schroeder's former justice minister's comparison of US President George W Bush to Adolf Hitler in last summer's election campaign. Not only Schroeder and that unfortunate lady, but politicians elsewhere are of limited mental accountability when desperate about winning an election, and suffer lapses of speech and memory.

In 1991, Iraq fired dozens of Scud missiles at Israel and threatened to arm the missiles with poison-gas and biological warheads. Most of the contents of those warheads were made in Germany or made with the aid of German engineers and technology. In light of German history, can Herr Schroeder countenance the possibility of a future poison gas attack on Israel (or anyone else) facilitated by German know-how? Schroeder may not want to go to war. So be it. But he should regard it as his most solemn obligation to do his absolute damnedest to make sure that in the future "good Germans" don't once again stand there and say: "We didn't know."

Friedbert Pflueger, foreign policy spokesman of the main opposition Christian Democratic parties and an embittered critic of Schroeder's and Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer's Iraq policy, last Thursday accused the red-green coalition government of deliberately keeping the German and world public uninformed of BND (German foreign intelligence service) evidence and assessments on the continued existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). "If we trust our [intelligence] services, and I do, then we know that there exist weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," said Pflueger, and referred to a November 13, 2002, BND briefing of members of parliament's foreign affairs committee in which relevant information was disclosed. As a member of parliament, added Pflueger, he was bound by his secrecy oath not to pass on such information, but challenged Schroeder to make it public forthwith. This was necessary, he said, "so that Herr Schroeder cannot continue to spread the impression that the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is a figment of George W Bush's imagination". He said further that he would dearly like to know exactly how many different types of smallpox virus were in Iraq's possession as - during a November 13 budget committee meeting - Health Minister Ulla Schmidt had motivated her request for a several million euro allocation for the purchase of smallpox vaccine with reference to such Iraqi stocks. Well, Gerhard, why's your minister worried? Or do vaccine purchases fall into the category of economic stimulus for the pharmaceutical industry?

The reason the BND is well-informed of Iraqi WMD programs - nuclear, biological and chemical - is straightforward: since the early 1980s, it has monitored German exports of dual-use nuclear technologies, precursor chemicals for poison-gas weapons, and "pharmaceutical" products and equipment for biological weapons manufacture to the Middle East. Indeed, there are strong suspicions that it was a silent partner in a Hamburg front company, Water Engineering Trading or WET, which covered for and facilitated such exports. Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said in his January 27 report that tons of Iraqi chemical and biological agents and precursors were unaccounted for. Over the years, well over half of the precursor materials and a majority of the tools and know-how for their conversion into weapons were sold to Iraq by German firms - both prior to and after the 1991 Gulf War. The BND has the details.

In the summer of 1994, the BND conducted a major study to estimate the magnitude of the - as at that time - still undeclared and concealed Iraqi WMD arsenal, relying on sales records in its possession of post-Gulf War German, Austrian, and Swiss exports of technologies, sub-systems and strategic materials to Iraq. It concluded that these exports pointed to several specific weapons programs, ranging from ballistic missile upgrades to poison gas manufacture, which Iraq had not declared and UN inspectors were unaware of and hence, not surprisingly, had failed to discover. While the magnitude of the current (1994) Iraqi weapons program "is difficult to assess", said the BND, there is no doubt that "some of the material and equipment" has eluded discovery and certain projects "are being revived and run clandestinely".

In February 2001, the BND compiled a further report and intelligence chief August Hanning told Spiegel magazine that, "Since the end of the UN inspections [December 1998], we have determined a jump in procurement efforts by Iraq," adding that Saddam was rebuilding destroyed weapons facilities "partly based on the German industrial standard".

According to the report:

Iraq has resumed its nuclear program and may be capable of producing an atomic bomb in three years;

Iraq is developing its Al Samoud and Ababil 100/Al Fatah short-range rockets, which can deliver a 300kg payload 150km. Medium-range rockets capable of carrying a warhead 3,000km could be built by 2005 - far enough to reach Europe;

Iraq is capable of manufacturing solid rocket fuel;

A Delhi-based company, blacklisted by the German government because of its alleged role in weapons proliferation, has acted as a buyer on Iraq's behalf. Deliveries have been made via Malaysia and Dubai. Indian companies have copied German machine tools down to the smallest detail and such equipment has been installed in numerous chemicals projects. [Note that such Indian cooperation with Iraq is something of a tradition: during the Iran-Iraq war India delivered precursors for warfare agents to Iraq - and later was found to have delivered quantities of the same materials to Iran. Baghdad's middleman at the time, an Iraqi with a German passport, founded a company in Singapore expressly for this purpose.]

Since the departure of the UN inspectors, the number of Iraqi sites involved in chemicals production has increased from 20 to 80. Of that total, a quarter could be involved in weapons production.

The BND's warnings didn't stop with that report. In April 2001, Hanning told the Welt am Sonntag newspaper that Iraq was developing a new class of chemical weapons, reiterated his alert on Iraq's missile and nuclear programs, and said that several German companies had continued to deliver to Baghdad components needed for the production of poison gas. In March 2002, he told the New Yorker magazine that, "It is our estimate that Iraq will have an atomic bomb in three years." The German opposition parties' demand that the government make public what it knows is thus no irresponsible, idle, politically inspired chatter as the ruling Social Democrats and Greens charge. The irresponsible chatter and politicking is Herr Schroeder's.

Houston, Texas, attorney Gary Pitts announced late last December that his firm, Pitts and Associates, would soon launch a class action suit on behalf of more than 3,000 sick Gulf War veterans against dozens of European companies accused of helping arm Iraq with weapons of mass destruction. Pitts said he had received a list of 56 international suppliers of equipment and raw materials necessary to make sarin, VX, mustard gas and other chemical agents from the Iraqi government. The list, brought back from Iraq by former weapons inspector Scott Ritter last September, proves identical to one included in a 1998 Iraqi chemical weapons declaration to the UN, resubmitted unchanged on December 7 and withheld from publication by the inspectors - along with other items - for reasons of "sensitivity". Withheld as well is a list of Iraqi nuclear technology suppliers originally contained in a 1996 declaration and also resubmitted on December 7. That nuclear weapons production details on uranium enrichment, detonation, implosion testing and warhead construction contained in Iraq's declarations should be withheld from all but the five permanent UN Security Council members may have some justification. That lists of suppliers for nuclear, chemical and biological weapons components are being withheld makes sense only if the UN inspectors want to save supplier countries and firms from embarrassment - precisely the embarrassment they should be exposed to to forestall future deliveries.

The list in Iraq's 1998/current chemical weapons declaration contains 31 "major suppliers", 14 from Germany. The 1996/current nuclear suppliers list has 62 company names on it, 33 from Germany. As Iraq claims that since 1991 it has not engaged in WMD production, the lists name no post-Gulf War suppliers. Call it old news. So much the sillier that the UN refuses to make them public. But since the BND claims that deliveries did not stop at the end of the Gulf War as well as simply as a matter of record of German complicity in arming Iraq, the issue remains an urgent current concern.

Leading the honor roll of chemical agents and production equipment suppliers (in this case nerve gas precursors and manufacturing) to Iraq is the German firm Preussag, now a subsidiary of Europe's largest travel agent and tour operator TUI - happy holidays! And Preussag has long been a firm dear to Schroeder's heart. In early 1998, when Schroeder was running for re-election as prime minister of the state of Lower Saxony which he had governed for eight years, he had the state buy 51 percent of Preussag's troubled steel division to the tune of US$500 million, claiming that 12,000 jobs were at stake. It was a characteristic Schroeder move: he knew that the Social Democrats would appoint him chancellor's candidate if he won in Lower Saxony. Win he did - first in Hannover, later in 1998 at the federal level to become chancellor. What did he know about the Preussag conglomerate's Iraq poison gas dealings? Don't ask.

Included on the Iraqi suppliers' lists are other world-renowned (eg, Hoechst, Daimler-Benz, Siemens, Kloeckner, Carl Zeiss, Schott Glas, etc) and smaller German firms. Notable are Karl Kolb/Pilot Plant and WTB (Walter Thosti Boswau) who built and equipped Iraq's two major "pesticide and detergent" plants which, said a WTB employee, produce "detergents to exterminate two-legged flies" (Spiegel 4/1989, p 24). The WTB undertaking was supported by a credit guarantee for several hundred million German marks by Hermes, a German government export and credit insurer. Noteworthy also is Rhein-Bayern, which supplied Iraq with eight mobile toxicological labs housed in sand-colored, camouflage-painted Magirus trucks.

Chemical agents? Biological agents? Machine tools and parts and materials for uranium enrichment and missile production? You name them and the Germans delivered them - and not only that: they supplied the plants and know-how for Iraq to make its own "pesticides" ("to protect the date harvest"), "vaccines" ("to eradicate smallpox and other contagious diseases"), and "x-ray machines".

Karl Kolb told investigative reporters following up the Pitts and Associates law suit that it has done business with Iraq for 35 years, but had no connection to its weapons programs. Preussag claimed that accusations it had supplied precursor chemicals for Iraqi weapons were untrue. Schott Glas said it was "a manufacturer of glass and glass components, not of weapons".

If Herr Schroeder had his way, one assumes, then that's where things would end. Happily, with some nasty American trial lawyers on the case, that's unlikely. And happily, though he tried once more in advance of last Sunday's state elections in Lower Saxony and Hesse to rally Germans to his party's cause with anti-Iraq war rhetoric, Schroeder was dealt a humiliating defeat in both states. He should have bought re-privatized Preussag once again. Even the most gullible of German voters saw through his miserable Iraq-war ploy this time around, blamed him for over 10 percent unemployment, and threw his candidates and party into the trash bin.
159 posted on 03/07/2003 3:27:39 PM PST by Kay Soze (F - France and Germany - They are my Nation's and my Family's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
Which unit are you talking about?

The KSK that hangs out in Kabul (special forces)?

The one incident where the Germans did something with 10th Mountain, is what your addressing I assume? How many operations did they go on before and after that “”ONE”” incident?

Your right. The US is in Korea 37,000, Sinai 1500, Israel 600, Japan, Columbia, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Bosnia, Kosovo, Philippines and the Germans can help by resisting the leading nation role and contributing what of the total pie in Afghanistan? What would you say? Lets give them a break and be liberal in the estimate. Not counting the Brits, NL, USA etcetera what do you think is Germanys contribution? 16% maybe 20%?

Who guards Karzai (our little bearded guys)? Who Jumped in to Bagram (RGR BAT)? Who's scouring the border with Pakistan? Am I wrong here? I’m serious, no malice intended.
160 posted on 03/07/2003 3:27:41 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson