Posted on 03/07/2003 7:35:36 AM PST by scripter
Fistgate IV will be held again on March 15 to teach teenagers how to play with the sexual organs of other students.
The first Fistgate was in 2000 and caused waves of protests from parents and others. It was exposed by the Parents Rights Coalition which taped part of the scandal so that people would finally understand what was happening, and by MassNews which reported it.
The homosexual community has said that its agenda was badly damaged by the scandal. It was almost unable to find a location for the event in 2001, but Tufts University finally did let them use its facilities again.
The sponsor of the event, GLSEN, an acronym for Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, says that the purpose of Fistgate is to teach safety and respect. But the event that was taped in 2000 went on for 55 minutes about explicit forms of homosexual sex, including thrusting your fist into another's rectum, before anything was even mentioned about condoms in the last five minutes.
Four years later in 2003, the Gay/Straight Alliance at Newton North High School, with the help of the state Dept, of Education, is handing out leaflets to students arriving at the school, which ask questions such as, "If you have never slept with a person of the same sex, how do you know that you wouldn't prefer that?"
It lists BAGLY as a resource for the teenagers to contact. In 1999, which was before Fistgate, MassNews reported that BAGLY offered $25 and free dinner to boys who would come to their headquarters in Boston and discuss homosexual sex and other issues. The boys were also invited to a free, three-day, lakeside, weekend retreat in New Hampshire with other "boys" up to 25-years, who are "attracted to or have sex with other men."
The following is printed on the Newton High pamphlets: "This project is supported by a grant from the Massachusetts Department of Education."
The state has been paying more than $1.5 million/year to help the Gay/Straight Alliances in the schools and similar activities. It is impossible to discover how much money is now going to those projects. Some of the money always went to GLSEN and it is assumed that much of it still does. <
Don't.
And any ?children? that were present were teenagers? don?t try to make it sound like they were kindergarteners
They were under the age of consent. It's 15 year olds now; it'll be 6 year olds in a decade. You're not going to assert that 'Queering Elementary Education' doesn't exist, are you?
The citizens in that room were victimized by the man with a recording device and an agenda.
You betcha. Me, I don't have coversations with underage teens that I wouldn't be willing to have made public. What have they got to hide?
Oh, wait, we know the answer to that.
I don?t ?advocate? for anything that goes on between consenting adults in private. Would YOU like to control the sex lives of others? A little Texas-style ?barging into the bedroom??
Ten years go, I would have been with you on this. However, I've been ineluctably drawn to the conclusion this really isn't about privacy. It's about transforming society, including the education of children, concepts of what is and isn't public decency, and heterosexual relations, none of which has a damn thing to do with what two men do together in a bedroom. It's about getting sexual access to ever younger adolescents. It's an agenda, usually disavowed but ever more frequently being acknowledged. And, since homosexuals are increasingly invading what I consider my space, I see no particular reason why I should respect theirs.
The site contact information was updated October 2002 and expires October 2005. It's ridiculous for gays to state NAMBLA isn't a viable organization because the copyright on their website hasn't been updated.Domain ID:D560828-LROR Domain Name:NAMBLA.ORG Created On:11-Oct-1996 04:00:00 UTC Last Updated On:19-Oct-2002 02:47:36 UTC Expiration Date:10-Oct-2005 04:00:00 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:R11-LROR
News reports. One of the workshops was explicitly directed at ages 14-21. You know this as well as I do. You are not attempting intellectually honest discussion here. Your purpose is to disrupt a conservative forum.
You're not going to assert that 'Queering Elementary Education' doesn't exist, are you?
I've never heard of anything called that
It was mentioned earlier in the thread. It's been widely reviewed in the gay literature. You claim to have atttended the GLSEN conference, yet you haven't heard of it? Please!
http://www.jtsears.com/qee.htm
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0847693694/qid%3D993047913/sr%3D1-1/ref%3Dsc%5Fb%5F1/002-2304555-1853602
http://gaytoday.com/garchive/reviews/020700re.htm
A good start.
Recruit - you can say that again. When I was at Cleveland State University, the student newspaper was always chock-full of ads seeking fresh 'meat'. It was like a marketing system. I used to laugh at them, but its obvious that there is a deliberate effort being made to draw young people. And yet, they claim that homosexuality is a condition with which people are born. If people are born "gay", they why do they market the idea?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.