Skip to comments.
LIVE THREAD: Blix Reports to the U.N. on Iraqi Compliance
http://freerepublic.com ^
| March 7, 2003
Posted on 03/07/2003 6:11:10 AM PST by Howlin
As usual, please no HUGE graphics
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: blix; iraq; saddam; un; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,760, 1,761-1,780, 1,781-1,800 ... 1,821 next last
To: Dog
Get the cat and drag it around...get rid of those pesky dustbunnies.. LOL .. that was bad .. I don't have to worry about dinner .. the in-laws are having the kiddies sleep over ..
I just need to clean this house and jump in the shower before I give the MIL something to complain about ..
OK .. I'm walking away from the computer .. Really .. honest ..ok .. I'm trying to
Wish me luck
1,761
posted on
03/07/2003 12:08:34 PM PST
by
Mo1
(RALLY FOR AMERICA - VALLEY FORGE,PA MARCH 16, 2003 1:00 PM)
To: prairiebreeze
Villipin bitch-slapped.....PRICELESS!! I was only listening -- from descriptions in this thread, I guess Frenchy looked like a gutted trout.
Listening was good enough, though: it was not a polite bitch-slapping. Straw engaged in no diplospeak whatsoever. He seems to have had some prepared remarks, but for the most part it sounded like he handled Frenchy's points directly and extemporaneously.
(He also, a little more politely, bitch-slapped Blix and the Nuke commission.)
I'm guessing you can probably pick it up on C-Span at some point. It's worth a search.
1,762
posted on
03/07/2003 12:08:47 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: Mo1
come back .....
To: RummyChick
"I am pretty amazed that Fox has gone as long as they have today with minimal anchors speaking and minimal -"THIS IS A FOX NEWS ALERT..."
...maybe they have been lurking at FR!
To: hispanarepublicana
so what is the newsworthiness of the first name
is it because he meant it as insult
or because he was so heated that he forgot what he was doing
..just how big of deal is it to call him by his first name
To: watchwoman
their coverage was pretty good today
minimal interruptions..not even sure if they did alot of advertising breaks..it wasn't perfect but better than in the past
but that constant news alert music coming with a some assinine NEWS ALERT has got to go..hopefully they have gotten the message
To: RummyChick
just how big of deal is it to call him by his first name In diplomatic or legislative circles, it's generally done if someone wants someone to know that they're speaking DOWN to them. It belittles your opponent.
1,767
posted on
03/07/2003 12:13:20 PM PST
by
hispanarepublicana
(successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
To: woofie
I would if I could .. but I'm really not here, so I can't
1,768
posted on
03/07/2003 12:13:52 PM PST
by
Mo1
(RALLY FOR AMERICA - VALLEY FORGE,PA MARCH 16, 2003 1:00 PM)
To: RummyChick
is it because he meant it as insult or because he was so heated that he forgot what he was doing
..just how big of deal is it to call him by his first nameI think that in diplo-speak, it's very patronizing. In that rarefied atmosphere, the diplomats aren't just people, they're nations. To bring one down by using a personal name...
1,769
posted on
03/07/2003 12:14:32 PM PST
by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
To: hispanarepublicana
**it's generally done if someone wants someone to know that they're speaking DOWN to them. It belittles your opponent.**
Interesting. I dont' know much Diplo-Speak...thank goodness!
Prairie
1,770
posted on
03/07/2003 12:15:05 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(One, two, three, dip, two, three. No Blixie, we've decided we don't want to dance with you anymore!)
To: Monty22
but using this as saying saddam is bad is hypocritical.Nonsense. Further, I pointed out it is more evidence of non-compliance. You do know that Saddam was supposed to provide evidence of ceasing and desisting in such behavior. You do know that he uses these on real people.
Yes, it shows he's bad, all right.
1,771
posted on
03/07/2003 12:15:23 PM PST
by
cyncooper
(God Be With President Bush)
To: hispanarepublicana
there was a banner just on fix that said something about N. Korea warning that US might attack a certain plant...started with a Y.
Frankly, I think that nut in North Korea is just as big a threat as Saddam.
To: Mo1
Dont leave us here all alone....
To: RummyChick
US might attack a certain plant...started with a Y. Yongbong (sp?) nuclear plant, which they've just restarted, and which produces material for building nukes.
1,774
posted on
03/07/2003 12:17:40 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: Monty22
The US stopped bio weapon production in 1975.
The US stopped Chemical weapon production years ago.
Johnston Atoll is where we destroy our and other countries arsenal of B/C weapons.
Congress just passed a spending bill less than a year ago where we are spending $500,000,000 on Russian C weapon destruction.
We currently only produce extremely small quantities of B/C agents for the development of protective systems. Example new NBC suit, M-22 chemical agent monitor, ICAM, NBC live agent chamber training. Yet this is ALL defensive in nature.
Even if we wanted too. The institutional knowledge on how to employ B/C weapons is lost. The US Army does NOT teach it to the NBC officer corps.
Animal testing=surly
Massive production or sales (as some idiots believe)=No
1,775
posted on
03/07/2003 12:19:04 PM PST
by
Red6
To: RummyChick
Frankly, I think that nut in North Korea is just as big a threat as Saddam.Not quite - Lil Kim just wants money. He figures if he keeps annoying us, we'll pay him to leave us alone.
1,776
posted on
03/07/2003 12:19:05 PM PST
by
mhking
(Don't pull on Superman's cape!)
To: cake_crumb
yep.
1,777
posted on
03/07/2003 12:21:46 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("what does the LORD require..? To ACT justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. ")
To: cyncooper; Monty22
Yes, it shows he's bad, all right. sounds like in essence you two are violently agreeing.
1,778
posted on
03/07/2003 12:23:39 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("what does the LORD require..? To ACT justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. ")
To: RummyChick
Frankly, I think that nut in North Korea is just as big a threat as Saddam. Bigger. But, we can still stop Saddam. It may be close to too-late for N. Korea.
1,779
posted on
03/07/2003 12:25:26 PM PST
by
hispanarepublicana
(successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
To: Monty22
I think the point is to drive home the fact that if Saddam Hussein ever uses the stuff, it won't be for the defense of his people, because he cares nothing for his people. It won't be to defend their beliefs, because he trashed their legal system when he came to power and assassinated even his fellow Bathist co-conspirators. It won't be to preserve a free nation, because Iraq is not free. It won't be to defend his neighbors, because Iraq preys upon other nations and annexes them. And unlike other nations, he has actually used the weapons in situations in which they were wholly unneccessary, even against Iraqis... and he has already shared these weapons anfd their manufacturing process with terrorist groups instead of behaving responsibly and keeping them under lock and key.
If Hussein uses these weapons or sells or gives them to others, they will be used against Americans or Brits or Israelis or Kuwaitis, etc... that alone makes his possession of such weapons more important than if, for example, New Zealand has them, or we have them, or if Denmark has them.
1,780
posted on
03/07/2003 12:28:42 PM PST
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,760, 1,761-1,780, 1,781-1,800 ... 1,821 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson