1 posted on
03/06/2003 6:23:26 PM PST by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: blam
"American military officials acknowledged yesterday that two prisoners captured in Afghanistan in December had been killed while under interrogation at Bagram air base There is nothing in the article to support the "while under interrogation" claim.
2 posted on
03/06/2003 6:27:05 PM PST by
mrsmith
To: blam
Is this writer a member of the distinguished Gumbel family that spawned Bryant?
3 posted on
03/06/2003 6:27:13 PM PST by
Thebaddog
(woof)
To: blam
Amazing how they can blow 2 isolated incidents...ones for which we don't know the whole story...into smearing the Bush Administration with a policy of torturing prisoners.
To: blam
Shocking. A tragedy. A disgrace.
So, anything good on TV?
5 posted on
03/06/2003 6:27:29 PM PST by
Slings and Arrows
(You people are actors - act like you have two brain cells to rub together.)
To: blam
OK ............ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
6 posted on
03/06/2003 6:28:55 PM PST by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(Compassionate Conservative Curmudgeon)
To: blam
Oh, and I don't care how many of the 'detainees' at Gitmo take the cowardly exit from life. Give them the rope if they want it.
To: blam
...reviving concerns that the US is resorting to torture in its treatment of Taliban fighters and suspected al-Qa'ida operatives. If it saves ONE American life, then it is worth it. What do these namby-pamby wimps expect? We are fighting for our lives.
9 posted on
03/06/2003 6:31:46 PM PST by
zip
(I love being right)
To: blam
Question to the press: Why limit the retrospective reporting to December at this point? Why not go back to the Revolutionary War while you're at it... Oh, I'm beginning to see WHY this is being reported NOW.
To: blam
While the US claims this still constitutes "humane" treatment, human rights groups including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have denounced it as torture as defined by international treaty.
Let's have AI and HRW go to Iraq and North Korea; you know, somewhere where their dedication to what they say they believe in actually causes them to run a little personal risk and show how much they really care.
11 posted on
03/06/2003 6:32:51 PM PST by
aruanan
To: blam
Next.
Jammer
13 posted on
03/06/2003 6:33:53 PM PST by
JamminJAY
(This space for rent)
To: blam
spokesman for the air base confirmed that the official cause of death of the two men was "homicide", contradicting earlier accounts that one had died of a heart attack and the other from a pulmonary embolism. Does this "spokesman" have a name? Total BS.
14 posted on
03/06/2003 6:36:58 PM PST by
TankerKC
(What's with the sudden influx of racist punks on FR?)
To: blam
Were the 3000 that died on 9/11 treated humanely?
Will those who will fall victim to these terrorists thugs in the future be treated humanely?
We've got a lot more to kill before the score is even.
15 posted on
03/06/2003 6:39:10 PM PST by
South40
To: blam
They still suffered less than they would if I were interrogating them.
To: blam
The
Independent is anything but.
It's to the left of the Guardian, which is a sucky liberal paper.
Two prisoners died of their injuries, probably incurred before capture or during it, and suddenly this becomes proof of torture to death. Amazing that we would admit it, eh?
17 posted on
03/06/2003 6:39:42 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: blam
I wanna talk to those "female officers" that got to kick 'em. Does the US military have female MPs just for this purpose?
19 posted on
03/06/2003 6:43:45 PM PST by
Rose in RoseBear
(HHD [ ... hope they polished their boots with pork fat ...])
To: blam
An eye for an eye. Live by terror, die by terror. Works for me.
To: blam
two prisoners captured in Afghanistan in December had been killed while under interrogation
What can I add, other than......GOOOOOOD!!
21 posted on
03/06/2003 6:51:13 PM PST by
ErnBatavia
((Bumperootus!))
To: blam
So is this story bunk because of the source,or are we now killing POW'S? I want the truth reported on matters like this. If this is true, then it goes against what we have said regarding the Geneva Convention standards that the USA swore to uphold and will reflect badly upon us.
Regardless of if they deserved it or not, it is hypocritical for us to condone it. I believe we can "Torture" combatants without causing death. In fact I did like the part about the women kicking them, but killing them is not right. Flame on. I'll catch the heat in the morning. G'night.
To: blam
I think it needs to read more accurately: Two
terrorists killed. And so on. And so forth.
MM out.
To: blam
Are they saying that Dano may have booked em one too many times?
25 posted on
03/06/2003 6:57:03 PM PST by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson